Globalization and Terrorism: Causes, Trends, and Solutions
This research report examines the relationship between globalization and terrorism, drawing on a selection of scholarly sources to analyze how increased cross-border integration has influenced terrorist activity worldwide. The paper begins by defining terrorism and identifying its common characteristics, then categorizes terrorist groups by motivation — left-wing, right-wing, ethno-nationalist, and religious. It traces the rising incidence of terrorism to factors including the growth of religiously motivated groups, advances in information technology, and the expanding global profile of the United States. The report then explores how globalization enables terrorist networks to expand, recruit, and evade prosecution, while also presenting counterevidence that economic integration may reduce transnational terrorism. The paper concludes with policy recommendations emphasizing coordinated military, diplomatic, and economic responses.
- Introduction: Scope and purpose of the research report
- What Is Terrorism?: Defining terrorism and its core characteristics
- Drivers of Terrorism: Four categories of terrorist motivation explained
- The Increasing Incidence of Terrorism: Religion, technology, and U.S. profile drive growth
- Terrorism and Globalization: How open borders enable transnational terrorist networks
- Potential Solutions to Global Terrorism: Military, diplomatic, and economic policy recommendations
- Conclusion: Globalization's mixed role and integration as a remedy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper synthesizes multiple peer-reviewed sources into a coherent narrative, moving logically from definition to causation to policy recommendation.
- It maintains intellectual balance by presenting both the dominant view — that globalization facilitates terrorism — and the counterargument from Li and Schaub (2004), which found economic integration may actually reduce transnational terrorism.
- Concrete historical examples (9/11, the 1998 Embassy bombings, Ahmed Ressam's arrest, Boko Haram's expansion) ground abstract arguments in verifiable events.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a literature synthesis structure: it groups findings from multiple sources thematically rather than summarizing each source in turn. This allows the writer to build a cumulative argument across sections, with citations serving as evidence for analytical claims rather than as organizational anchors. The acknowledgment of contradictory findings (Li & Schaub's null result on globalization increasing domestic terrorism) shows awareness of scholarly debate and strengthens the paper's credibility.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a classic research report format: introduction establishing scope, definitional section establishing shared terms, analytical sections on causes and trends, a central section on the globalization–terrorism link, a solutions section, and a brief conclusion. A short presentation summary and methodology note appended after the main text reflect the paper's dual assignment purpose. Overall structure is clear and easy to follow, making it a strong model for undergraduate research writing.
Introduction
Terrorism has been a serious global concern for decades, with researchers now warning that globalization has played a significant role in fueling terrorist activities in recent years. This report examines the impact of globalization on terrorism. It begins with a definition of terrorism, its drivers, and reasons for its increased incidence.
The September 11, 2001 attacks remain one of the darkest days in American history. On that day, two commercial passenger jets were hijacked by suicide bombers and flown into the World Trade Center in New York, killing thousands of innocent civilians. Multiple attacks of a similar nature have occurred in different countries across the world, with the most notable being the bombing of American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, and more recently, the killing of 130 innocent civilians in a series of coordinated attacks in Paris in November 2015. These attacks have aroused widespread indignation and prompted nations to coordinate efforts against not only the perpetrators and sponsors of such activities, but against international terrorism as a whole. The success of these efforts depends on how well the nations of the world understand the concept of terrorism, its motivations, and the trends in terrorist activities.
A substantial body of research has already been conducted in these specific areas. This report brings together findings from a set of selected studies to provide insight on the impact of globalization on terrorism. It examines the definition of terrorism, its causes and drivers, its evolution and trends, and ways through which it could be addressed.
What Is Terrorism?
There is currently no standard definition for the term "terrorism" (Cronin, 2003; Guillaume, 2004). The difficulty in developing a standard definition arises in part because terrorist activities, and their drivers and motivations, keep evolving (Cronin, 2003). Researchers, however, concur that acts of terror usually share a set of common characteristics that, when considered together, provide a working definition of what terrorism is.
These characteristics are: (a) the acts are political in nature; (b) the perpetrators use violence against seemingly innocent actors; (c) the acts are aimed at causing death or severe physical injury; (d) the perpetrator's primary objective is to create terror among members of the target group; and (e) the acts are planned and executed in a coordinated, organized manner by either an individual or a collective group of individuals (Cronin, 2003, p. 33; Guillaume, 2004, p. 540).
Based on these characteristics, terrorism can be defined as the use of random violence against innocents with the aim of causing terror and achieving a predetermined political goal. When such an act involves institutions, victims, targets, or perpetrators from another country, it is referred to as transnational terrorism (Li & Schaub, 2004, p. 231). The 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center are a prominent example of a transnational terrorist event (Li & Schaub, 2004, p. 231).
References
Cronin, A. K. (2003). Behind the curve: Globalization and international terrorism. International Security, 27(3), 30–58.
Gomez, J. M. (2010). A financial profile of the terrorism of Al-Qaeda and its affiliates. Perspectives on Terrorism, 4(4).
Grothaus, N. (2011). Types of terrorism. Hand of Reason. Retrieved February 5, 2016, from http://handofreason.com/2011/featured/types-of-terrorism
Guillaume, G. (2004). Terrorism and international law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 53(1), 537–548.
Li, Q., & Schaub, D. (2004). Economic globalization and transnational terrorism: A pooled time-series analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(2), 230–258.
Shola, O. J. (2015). Globalization of terrorism: A case study of Boko Haram in Nigeria. International Journal of Politics and Good Governance, 6(6), 1–22.
Todd, H. (2007). Catastrophic terrorism at the border: The case of the Canada–United States border. The Naval Postgraduate School. Retrieved February 5, 2016, from http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/25101/84.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Wanandi, J. (2002). A global coalition against international terrorism. International Security, 26(4), 184–189.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.