Reflection Paper Undergraduate 1,843 words

Good and Bad Leadership Experiences in the Classroom

~10 min read
Abstract

This reflection paper examines a student's personal experiences with effective and ineffective leadership in a university classroom setting. Drawing on encounters with two supportive professors and one disengaged instructor, the paper explores how qualities such as emotional intelligence, social intelligence, and servant leadership shape the learning environment. The student contrasts professors who fostered open communication and genuine student engagement with a professor who treated teaching as a mechanical obligation. From these experiences, the student derives personal lessons about the kind of leader they aspire to become, emphasizing humility, community, and a commitment to helping others succeed.

πŸ“ How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide β€” click to expand
β–Ό

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper uses vivid, concrete personal anecdotes to ground abstract leadership concepts β€” servant leadership and emotional intelligence are not just named but illustrated through specific classroom moments.
  • The contrast structure (two good professors versus one bad professor) is clean and purposeful, making the argument easy to follow and the evidence easy to evaluate.
  • The student's self-aware voice β€” acknowledging past shyness, personal growth, and the desire to model admired leadership β€” gives the reflection authenticity and depth.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates how to anchor personal reflection in academic theory. Rather than simply narrating experiences, the student ties observations to named leadership frameworks (servant leadership, emotional intelligence, destructive leadership) and supports claims with peer-reviewed citations (Schyns & Schilling, 2013; Anand et al., 2005). This technique β€” moving from lived experience to theoretical framing β€” is the hallmark of an effective reflection paper at the undergraduate level.

Structure breakdown

The paper follows a four-part structure: an introduction that previews the contrast and states the student's leadership values; a section on positive professor experiences with specific behavioral examples; a section on the negative professor experience using the same behavioral lens; and a conclusion that synthesizes lessons into personal leadership aspirations. The symmetry between the positive and negative sections strengthens the comparative argument.

Introduction

In school I have had good and bad experiences in dealing with leaders. Two good experiences I had with professors at my university were in classes where the professors recognized that I was an international student. I appreciated their recognition because it is something that is obvious but not always acknowledged. One bad experience I had with a professor was a situation where the professor did not care to get to know the students and seemed to be there simply because it was a job, not because she loved doing it. My favorite teachers have been those who show a genuine interest in students. To me, they possess leadership qualities like Emotional Intelligence and Social Intelligence. They also demonstrate servant leadership skills, which I appreciate because it suggests they truly care about helping students achieve their goals.

When teachers act as though they are superior and all-knowing, treating students as unintelligent simply because they lack degrees, I feel the teacher is compensating for some internal absence and is not being a good leader. Bad leaders bring negative energy to an environment and can pull down morale (Schyns & Schilling, 2013) β€” and that is exactly what happened in my experience with a professor who did not show that she cared about students.

The Two Good Professors

The two good professors who stand out in my university experience appealed to me because, from the first day of class, they showed interest in getting to know their students. I am also interested in getting to know my professors, so I appreciated that we did not simply dive into course material and ignore the fact that we were strangers. Since we were investing time together, it made sense to take a little while to learn about one another. I used to be shy and embarrassed about sharing information about myself because I was uncertain about my future β€” but that was some time ago. I have since made up my mind about who I want to be, and I am more confident now.

Sometimes in class a student is uncomfortable speaking, much like I once was. What I liked about these two professors was that they never tried to make such a student feel strange or embarrassed. Instead, they showed sensitivity and expressed genuine interest in whatever little the student had to say. One professor would ask thoughtful questions or use gentle humor to help the student open up β€” the student would laugh and feel more comfortable. On another occasion, when humor did not work, the same professor shifted to a more serious tone, showing the student that he respected the student's ideas. This worked: the student sat up and began to feel good about being taken seriously. Both professors demonstrated this ability to be effective and adaptive communicators.

When it came to me specifically, they noticed I was an international student and showed interest in where I am from, asking genuine questions. What I also appreciated was that they did not show any greater interest in one student over another. It could not be said that this teacher favored one type of student. The professors were genuinely kind to everyone as they got to know us, and I did not feel out of place β€” I felt connected. I believe everyone felt at ease after that first session dedicated to getting acquainted. We realized we were all there together to accomplish the same goal. We all want good grades and success, and after that first day, in both classes, we understood that we could help each other and speak very freely, asking questions and offering solutions.

I later learned that these two professors were friends, which helped me understand why their styles were so similar: they both seemed committed to servant leadership and wanted to express this philosophy in their own lives. I appreciated this deeply and wished all my teachers truly embraced it β€” not just displayed it superficially. Sometimes a teacher can go through the motions without really believing in the approach or being interested in it. This is a problem because it makes students feel like they are simply part of a formula the teacher feels obligated to follow. I do not like feeling that contact and communication are purely formulaic. I want to believe there is genuine interest and regard in any interaction I have with someone.

2 Locked Sections · 680 words remaining
Sign up to read these 2 sections

The One Bad Professor · 390 words

"Disengaged teaching and dismissive leadership style"

Lessons Learned · 290 words

"Aspirations to practice servant leadership personally"

You’re 39% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Servant Leadership Emotional Intelligence Social Intelligence Destructive Leadership Student Engagement Classroom Communication Leadership Qualities Personal Reflection Humility Community
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Good and Bad Leadership Experiences in the Classroom. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/good-bad-leadership-experiences-classroom-2166107

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.