Group Therapy Proposal for Adolescent Borderline Personality Disorder
This paper presents a group therapy proposal for addressing Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in adolescents aged 13–19. It reviews existing research on BPD prevalence, symptoms, and risk factors among teens, noting the challenges of distinguishing BPD from typical developmental behavioral changes. The proposal outlines a rationale for focusing on this population, establishes inclusion and exclusion criteria, and describes a group therapy design incorporating cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, and dialectical behavior therapy within a family therapy modality. The paper also addresses practical considerations such as remote session formats, participant recruitment, and session goals aimed at equipping teens and their caregivers with strategies to manage BPD's adverse effects.
- Introduction: BPD overview and its impact on adolescents
- Rationale: Why adolescents are the study focus
- Literature Review: Research on BPD symptoms, anger, and teen violence
- Target Population: Inclusion criteria and risk factors for teen BPD
- Group Type and Structure: Session format, frequency, and participant logistics
- Group Orientation: CBT, interpersonal, and dialectical behavior therapy approaches
- General Overview of the Group: Session topics, goals, and evaluation methods
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The proposal grounds each design decision — population selection, inclusion/exclusion criteria, session format — in specific citations, demonstrating awareness of the empirical literature.
- It anticipates real-world challenges (participant reactivity, undiagnosed comorbidities, scheduling constraints) and explicitly addresses them, adding practical credibility to the design.
- The three-therapy orientation (CBT, interpersonal therapy, and DBT) is justified logically, with each modality linked to a distinct dimension of adolescent BPD.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a literature-to-design bridge technique: findings from the literature review (e.g., Reuter et al.'s data on teen dating violence, Berenson et al.'s rejection–rage contingency) are directly translated into rationale for specific therapeutic choices. This moves the proposal beyond generic recommendations and shows how research evidence shapes intervention design.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a standard clinical proposal arc: Introduction establishes the problem and stakes → Rationale justifies the population focus → Literature Review synthesizes relevant research → Target Population specifies who is included and why → Group Type outlines logistics → Group Orientation explains therapeutic frameworks → General Overview describes session flow and assumptions. This scaffolded structure ensures each section builds purposefully on the last.
Introduction
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) affects both teens and adults. There is sufficient research on how this disorder affects adults, but content addressing how it affects teenagers remains limited. Teens represent a sensitive group in society — they are in the developmental phase and experience significant behavioral change. As a result, teens often become vulnerable to BPD, a situation that proves confusing to caregivers and parents. The series of changes during adolescence makes it challenging to identify actual BPD symptoms among teens, and there have been ongoing controversies about whether this particular group warrants a BPD diagnosis. However, the personality effects of BPD among teens and the extent to which those effects shape their future lives make diagnosis necessary in order to address the growing challenges.
BPD is a mental health disorder characterized by compromised relationships, irregular behaviors, varied moods, and a distorted self-image. When people suffer from BPD, controlling their moods becomes extremely difficult, and this has significant consequences for their personal lives and their interactions with others. For adolescents who have not yet fully developed, the disorder can substantially affect behavior and character formation. In addition, the effects of BPD on adolescents and the associated interventions make it challenging for therapists to design appropriate strategies to meet this population's needs (Sharp & Fonagy, 2015).
The focus of this proposal on BPD is essential because of the importance of emotional control and mood regulation. The research examines mood changes among adolescents and serves as a meaningful step toward exploring possible therapeutic interventions that can help adolescents control their moods and develop positive social relationships. To derive the best findings on BPD, the study is designed to incorporate existing research in order to identify current therapeutic approaches and to utilize past statistical data that demonstrate the prevalence of BPD among teenagers.
Rationale
Adolescents display variation in behavioral changes due to hormonal influences during the transitional phase of development. As a result, it is possible to mistake BPD symptoms for these normative changes, making a specific focus on this population necessary (Sharp & Fonagy, 2015). Focusing on adolescents as a group to examine the effects of BPD helps generate diverse data and provides a more comprehensive picture of what teenagers with BPD experience, as well as the challenges their parents face in understanding and managing their behavior. Findings are more reliable when participants come from varying social classes, locations, and environments that influence them, resulting in an outcome that more accurately represents the actual effects of BPD. This rationale also helps eliminate the bias associated with using a less integrated sample.
References
Berenson, K. R., Downey, G., Rafaeli, E., Coifman, K. G., & Paquin, N. L. (2011). The rejection–rage contingency in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(3), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023335
Leichsenring, F., Leibing, E., Kruse, J., New, A. S., & Leweke, F. (2011). Borderline personality disorder. The Lancet, 377(9759), 74–84. )61422-5
Linehan, M. M., Korslund, K. E., Harned, M. S., Gallop, R. J., Lungu, A., Neacsiu, A. D., McDavid, J., Comtois, K. A., & Murray-Gregory, A. M. (2015). Dialectical behavior therapy for high suicide risk in individuals with borderline personality disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(5), 475. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3039
Reuter, T. R., Sharp, C., Temple, J. R., & Babcock, J. C. (2015). The relation between borderline personality disorder features and teen dating violence. Psychology of Violence, 5(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037891
Sharp, C., & Fonagy, P. (2015). Practitioner review: Borderline personality disorder in adolescence — recent conceptualization, intervention, and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(12), 1266–1288.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.