Health Care Disparities and Social Justice in the U.S.

Introduction

Health care is an important and timely issue that reflects various forms of social injustice in the United States. The challenge of ensuring equal and equitable access to health care, respect for human dignity and diversity in health care provision, and mutual interdependence in health care systems is a societal responsibility that requires critical examination. The principles of Equality and Equity in Opportunity, Respect for Human Dignity and Diversity, and Mutual Interdependence — foundational to the field of human relations — provide a lens through which this examination can occur. These principles are deeply embedded within human rights and the social justice ethos, and they also inform the ways in which health care systems should ideally function.

This paper examines how health care disparities in the United States violate these principles, shedding light on the systemic social injustices inherent in the health care system. In doing so, it also emphasizes the imperative of addressing these disparities in the pursuit of social justice.

The Three Human Relations Principles

The principle of equality and equity in opportunity is founded on the ideal that all individuals, irrespective of their socio-economic background, race, or gender, should have the same level of access to opportunities. This principle is essential to any discussion of human rights and social justice, as it asserts that disparities in access to resources and opportunities are indicative of systemic inequities that need to be rectified (Marmot, 2005).

Equality refers to giving everyone the same resources, while equity involves distributing resources based on the needs of the recipients. Both concepts are crucial in promoting social justice and eliminating disparities (Braveman, 2014).

The principle of respect for human dignity and diversity is a cornerstone of human rights and social justice. It affirms the inherent worth and intrinsic value of every person, regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion, socio-economic status, or other characteristic. This principle originates from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), which posits that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. Respecting diversity involves acknowledging and valuing the differences among people, understanding that these differences enrich our humanity rather than detract from it (Banks, 2004).

Mutual interdependence implies that the wellbeing of each individual is connected to the wellbeing of others, and that one's actions can significantly affect others. It asserts that society functions optimally when individuals recognize their interconnectedness and act in ways that promote collective wellbeing. This principle has roots in many philosophical and sociological theories, including systems theory, which posits that all elements of a system are interconnected and that changes in one part can impact the entire system (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). In the context of social justice, recognizing mutual interdependence can lead to policies and practices that promote collective wellbeing rather than individual gain.

Health Care Injustice

The principle of equality and equity in opportunity forms the cornerstone of a just society. It advocates for every individual to have equal and equitable access to opportunities, including health care. However, the United States' health care system exhibits persistent disparities that significantly violate this principle. Despite the enactment of progressive legislation such as the Affordable Care Act (ACA), inequalities and inequities in health care access remain widespread.

The ACA was intended to increase health insurance coverage and improve access to health services for all individuals. While it expanded access for many, significant disparities persist. Insurance coverage does not automatically translate into equality of access to health care. Not all health insurance plans are created equal, with many offering varying degrees of coverage. As a result, insured individuals may still face barriers to accessing necessary health care due to high deductibles, copayments, and out-of-pocket expenses. This situation is particularly difficult for low-income individuals and families who may struggle to afford these additional costs, resulting in inequity in access to health care.

Racial and ethnic disparities further exacerbate this issue. Studies have consistently found that racial and ethnic minorities — specifically Black and Hispanic Americans — have lower rates of health insurance coverage and access to care compared to their white counterparts (Artiga & Orgera, 2020). These disparities extend beyond insurance coverage, impacting the quality of care received, the outcomes of care, and the likelihood of receiving preventive services (Institute of Medicine, 2003).

Such disparities reflect systematic inequalities that extend beyond health care. They can be attributed to a complex interplay of factors including, but not limited to, socio-economic status, education level, geographical location, and systemic racism. These factors create barriers to accessing health care, leading to disparities in health outcomes and revealing a clear lack of equity and equality in health care opportunities.

In essence, the current health care system in the United States is marked by significant disparities that violate the principle of equality and equity in opportunity. This violation necessitates urgent rectification to advance social justice and ensure all individuals receive the health care they need to thrive.

The principle of respect for human dignity and diversity is vital in all aspects of life, including health care. It underscores the inherent worth of every individual and the necessity to honor and value the diverse characteristics that each person brings. However, the health care system in the United States has, to a significant degree, been shown to neglect this principle.

Evidence from numerous studies suggests that not all groups within the United States are treated with equal consideration within the health care system. A landmark report by the Institute of Medicine (now the National Academy of Medicine) entitled Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care (2003) found that racial and ethnic minorities often receive lower quality care than white patients. This disparity in treatment persisted even when factors such as insurance type, income, age, and severity of conditions were taken into account (Mayberry et al., 2000).

Racial and ethnic disparities in health care range from reduced rates of preventive care and higher rates of preventable hospitalizations to lower quality hospital services. For example, African American and Hispanic patients are less likely to receive appropriate cardiac medication or undergo bypass surgery, and are more likely to receive less desirable procedures such as lower-limb amputations for diabetes (Mayberry et al., 2000).

These disparities extend beyond simple markers of quality of care and touch upon the treatment and consideration given to patients. It is well documented that racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to report dissatisfaction with their interactions with health care providers. They often report feeling disrespected, being poorly communicated with, and experiencing bias or discrimination in their health care encounters (Blendon et al., 2008).

Such patterns of differential treatment not only show a disregard for the principle of equality but also represent a fundamental disrespect for human dignity and diversity. By not providing the same quality of care to all racial and ethnic groups, the health care system effectively devalues certain populations and fails to honor the richness that diversity brings to society.

To truly respect human dignity and diversity, the health care system must strive to deliver quality care that does not vary on the basis of personal characteristics such as race, ethnicity, or socio-economic status. Ensuring this respect is pivotal to upholding the principles of human relations and achieving social justice in health care.

Mutual interdependence — a principle emphasizing the interconnectedness of all individuals within a society — is fundamental to a just and functioning health care system. The principle recognizes that the welfare of each person is inherently linked to the welfare of others, suggesting that social health and wellbeing can only be achieved when everyone has access to necessary care. Unfortunately, current health care disparities in the U.S. illustrate a fundamental failure to acknowledge and uphold this principle.

The COVID-19 pandemic provided a stark reminder of the relevance of this principle in health care. As an infectious disease, COVID-19 spread rapidly through communities, demonstrating that the health of one person can directly impact the health of others. Health systems around the world grappled with the challenge of providing care to all affected individuals, highlighting the critical importance of universal access to health care.

Despite this realization, access to health care services remains highly unequal in the U.S. Many people, particularly those from low-income households or marginalized communities, still lack access to basic health services. This lack of access has serious implications not only for the health of these individuals but also for the health of society as a whole.

When individuals cannot access preventive care, minor health issues can escalate into major health problems. These situations can lead to higher health care costs for everyone, as resources must be diverted to address preventable health crises. In addition, when a significant portion of the population is unhealthy, societal health and productivity suffer, affecting everyone within that society.

Further, the concept of mutual interdependence is not solely related to disease transmission. Health care systems themselves are complex networks of interdependent parts, including hospitals, clinics, health care providers, insurance companies, and patients. The performance of each of these components affects the entire system. Disparities in access to care can strain other parts of the system, leading to inefficiencies, increased costs, and reduced quality of care for all.

The evident health care disparities in the U.S. thus highlight a crucial failure to acknowledge mutual interdependence. The principle underscores the necessity of ensuring everyone has access to the care they need for society to function optimally. Ignoring this interconnectedness hinders the pursuit of social justice in health care and reinforces systemic health inequities.

Conclusion

The systemic health disparities that exist within the United States' health care system represent a clear violation of the principles of Equality and Equity in Opportunity, Respect for Human Dignity and Diversity, and Mutual Interdependence. These violations are not simply issues of public health or economic efficiency; they are matters of social justice. Social justice demands that all individuals, regardless of their socioeconomic, racial, or ethnic background, have fair and equitable access to resources, opportunities, and health care.

Addressing these disparities is imperative for several reasons. First, access to health care is a fundamental human right. Ensuring every individual has access to the care they need, regardless of their circumstances, is essential to upholding these rights. Moreover, the pervasive inequalities and inequities in health care not only harm those who are disadvantaged but also undermine the principle of equality that is fundamental to a just society. Addressing these disparities will ensure that everyone has a fair opportunity to attain their full health potential.

Additionally, health care disparities reflect a disregard for the principle of Respect for Human Dignity and Diversity. Ensuring that every individual, regardless of race or ethnicity, receives the same quality of care is a crucial step toward honoring diversity and maintaining human dignity. Finally, health care disparities highlight a failure to acknowledge our interconnectedness as members of society. For all of these reasons, the systemic health disparities evident within the U.S. health care system necessitate urgent action.

Artiga, S., & Orgera, K. (2020). Key facts on health and health care by race and ethnicity. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Banks, J. A. (2004). Diversity and citizenship education: Global perspectives. Jossey-Bass.

Blendon, R. J., Buhr, T., Cassidy, E. F., Perez, D. J., Hunt, K. A., Fleischfresser, C., et al. (2008). Disparities in health: Perspectives of a multi-ethnic, multi-racial America. Health Affairs, 27(5), 1539–1548.

Braveman, P. (2014). What is health equity: And how does a life-course approach take us further toward it? Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(2), 366–372.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1).

Institute of Medicine. (2003). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. The National Academies Press.

Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 80–94.

Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet, 365(9464), 1099–1104.

Mayberry, R. M., Mili, F., & Ofili, E. (2000). Racial and ethnic differences in access to medical care. Medical Care Research and Review, 57(1), 108–145.

United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights.