Healthcare Information Systems: Medical Errors and Patient Safety
This paper examines Healthcare Information Systems (HIS) and their relationship to medical errors and patient safety. It surveys the types and components of HIS, including mobile and wireless technologies, and outlines the advantages of health information technology—such as cost reduction, improved communication, and enhanced care quality—alongside its disadvantages, including privacy concerns, training deficiencies, and implementation barriers. The paper then analyzes medical errors, distinguishing between individual and system-level causes, reviewing statistics on error frequency and cost, and identifying contributing factors such as paper-based and computerized hybrid workflows. It concludes with recommendations for improving HIS implementation, staff training, and medication dispensing systems to reduce unintended consequences and advance patient safety.
- Introduction: HIS overview and paper objectives
- Healthcare Information Systems: Types, Uses, and Components: HIS types, mobile tech, and wireless applications
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Health Information Technology: Benefits and drawbacks of health IT adoption
- Medical Errors Related to Healthcare Information Systems: Types and causes of medication and computer errors
- Factors That Contribute to Errors: Hybrid systems and human factors behind errors
- Areas for Improvement: Recommendations for IT implementation and training
- Conclusion: Future of health IT and patient safety outlook
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper maintains a clear, logical progression from defining HIS and its benefits to identifying its risks and proposing solutions, keeping the reader oriented throughout.
- It balances breadth and focus: it covers a wide range of HIS topics while consistently returning to the central concern of medication errors and patient safety.
- The inclusion of concrete statistics—such as 98,000 annual deaths from medical errors and projected EHR savings of $371 billion—grounds abstract arguments in measurable impact.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses a problem-solution framework: it first establishes the value of healthcare information technology, then identifies the specific problem of medical errors, and finally proposes actionable improvements. This structure is reinforced by consistent citation of peer-reviewed sources and policy reports, lending credibility to each claim.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction that frames the dual promise and risk of HIS. A descriptive middle section covers types, components, and the advantages and disadvantages of health IT. The paper then shifts to a focused analysis of medical errors—their types, causes, and statistics. It closes with improvement recommendations and a forward-looking conclusion that advocates for research, automation, and patient engagement in medication safety.
Introduction
Healthcare organizations are challenged every day by the need to manage and integrate their clinical, financial, and operational information. In order to meet this challenge, an organization can use a Healthcare Information System (HIS) to help them. Healthcare Information Systems deal with the resources, devices, and methods required to optimize the acquisition, storage, retrieval, and use of information in healthcare. Health information tools include not only computers but also clinical guidelines, formal medical terminologies, and information and communication systems. These tools are used in the areas of nursing, clinical care, dentistry, pharmacy, public health, and medical research (Hebda and Czar, 2008).
The goal of using Healthcare Information Systems is to help improve patient safety and care while reducing overall healthcare costs. While these outcomes are usually realized, there have been instances of errors occurring. Determining the causes of these errors and implementing plans to prevent them in the future is essential to ensure that everyone involved receives accurate and safe healthcare. This paper explores the factors that contribute to medical errors while using Healthcare Information Systems, which lead to unintended consequences. It also offers an overview of the areas that need improvement related to patient safety, with recommendations for future strategies.
Healthcare Information Systems: Types, Uses, and Components
In order to improve the quality of patient care and keep pace with the increased healthcare needs of the population, Healthcare Information Systems have been put into place. The strategy used is often very comprehensive and addresses all aspects of the care delivery process. HIS are often founded on enterprise information systems that aim to support end-to-end business processes in the healthcare domain. Two major requirements are usually the focus: (1) to provide efficient healthcare-related data management in support of decision-making processes, and (2) to support a continuous process of healthcare resource spending optimization (Gvozdanović, Konáar, Kojundžić, and Jezidžić, 2007).
E-health is based on various information and communication technologies being used in several different ways. Some technologies, such as email, are already in use in most hospitals. Others, such as videoconferencing or the internet, are used more modestly, although their use is growing. Still others represent areas of untapped opportunity. In all cases, it is important that technologies enable the delivery of health services to all primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare providers (Brommeyer, 2005).
Advances in wireless technology have allowed for the rapid development of mobile applications. The mobile revolution has brought about dramatic and fundamental changes to daily life, influencing the way people live, work, and manage their health. In the healthcare industry, mobile health applications have created a new frontier for offering better care and services to patients, as well as a more flexible way of communicating with suppliers and patients. Mobile applications provide important real-time data for patients, physicians, insurers, and suppliers. They have also revolutionized the way information is managed in the healthcare industry and redefined how doctors and patients communicate (Keng and Shen, 2006).
Over the last several years, wireless devices such as handheld PCs, PDAs, messaging devices, electronic organizers, and smartphones have become increasingly popular. Mobile device ownership has largely been boosted by the evolution of mobile telecommunication networks and the mobile internet, which have expanded into immediate and personalized mobile environments. Wireless communication has been used to equip a mobile healthcare workforce and ensure that ambulatory patients in need of monitoring remain in contact with the necessary systems and services. Healthcare providers regularly carry handheld computers to the bedside, whether in the hospital or at home (Brommeyer, 2005).
References
Al-Assaf, Al F., Bumpus, Lisa J., Carter, Dana, and Dixon, Stephen B. (2003). Preventing errors in healthcare: A call for action. Hospital Topics, 81(3), 5–12.
Brommeyer, Mark. (2005). E-nursing and e-patients. Nursing Management — UK, 11(9), 12–13.
Damberg, Cheryl L., Ridgely, M. Susan, Shaw, Rebecca, Meili, Robin C., Sorbero, Melony E., Bradley, Lily A., and Farley, Donna O. (2009). Adopting information technology to drive improvements in patient safety: Lessons from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Health Information Technology Grantees. Health Services Research, 44(2), 684–700.
DePhillips, Henry A. Initiatives and barriers to adopting health information technology. Disease Management & Health Outcomes, 15(1), 1–6.
Donovan, Hugh. (2007). EHR & EDC: Tomorrow's technology today. Applied Clinical Trials, 16(2), 54–62.
Gvozdanović, Darko, Konáar, Miroslav, Kojundžić, Vinko, and Jezidžić, Hrvoje. (2007). National healthcare information system in Croatian primary care: The foundation for improvement of quality and efficiency in patient care. Informatics in Primary Care, 15(3), 181–185.
Hebda, Toni Lee and Czar, Patricia. (2008). Handbook of informatics for nurses and healthcare professionals (4th ed.). Prentice Hall Inc.
Information technology in health care. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2009, from
Keng Siau and Zixing Shen. (2006). Mobile healthcare informatics. Medical Informatics & the Internet in Medicine, 31(2), 89–99.
Koshy, Ranie. (2005). Navigating the information technology highway: Computer solutions to reduce errors and enhance patient safety. Transfusion, 45(Suppl. 4), 189S–205S.
Lazarus, Ross, Kleinman, Ken P., Dashevsky, Inna, DeMaria, Alfred, and Platt, Richard. (2001). Using automated medical records for rapid identification of illness syndromes (syndromic surveillance): The example of lower respiratory infection. BMC Public Health, 1, 9.
Oren, Eyal, Shaffer, Ellen R., and Guglielmo, B. Joseph. (2003). Impact of emerging technologies on medication errors and adverse drug events. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 60(14), 1447.
O'Shea, Ellen. (1999). Factors contributing to medication errors: A literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8(5), 496–504.
Santell, John P., Kowiatek, Joanne G., Weber, Robert J., Hicks, Rodney W., and Sirio, Carl A. (2009). Medication errors resulting from computer entry by nonprescribers. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 66(9), 843–853.
Some advantages and disadvantages of information technology. (2008). Retrieved October 25, 2009, from Small Business Bible Web site:
Spetz, Joanne and Keane, Dennis. (2009). Information technology implementation in a rural hospital: A cautionary tale. Journal of Healthcare Management, 54(5), 337–348.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.