This paper examines the ethical tensions that arise for nurses when implementing the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in daily practice. It explores how HIPAA's patient privacy requirements can sometimes conflict with the Nursing Code of Ethics, particularly around issues of confidentiality, patient commitment, and professional judgment. The paper identifies key nursing principles affected by HIPAA, analyzes relevant provisions of the Code of Ethics, and argues that the two frameworks are largely congruent. It concludes that following the Code of Ethics — especially Provision 3 — provides nurses with a reliable guide for resolving most HIPAA-related ethical dilemmas, supported by critical thinking and a return to foundational professional principles.
The paper demonstrates comparative ethical analysis: it sets two normative frameworks side by side (HIPAA regulations and the Nursing Code of Ethics), identifies points of conflict, and then systematically resolves them by finding the deeper principles they share. This move — from apparent contradiction to underlying alignment — is a hallmark of applied ethics writing.
The paper follows a problem–context–analysis–resolution pattern across five sections. The introduction frames HIPAA as a source of institutional and ethical tension. The dilemma section identifies specific conflict scenarios. The principles and ethical responsibilities sections analyze the nursing code provisions most relevant to HIPAA. The final section proposes resolutions, integrating personal professional experience and critical thinking as practical tools for ethical decision-making.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) has transformed several aspects of the healthcare profession. From an institutional perspective, the law creates the risk that employees will fail to adhere to its standards. If this occurs, the institution is subject to sanction from the Office of Civil Rights (OCR). As such, institutions must ensure that all employees are aware of and follow the guidelines established under HIPAA. However, these guidelines do not cover every specific situation. While in most cases the accurate course of action is clear, there will be numerous instances where a nurse is faced with an ethical dilemma. Under such circumstances, professional judgment can be used to "fill in the gaps" (Lo, Dornbrand & Dubler, 2005). For nurses, this judgment can be informed by the Nursing Code of Ethics.
Although HIPAA was intended to ensure consistency in protecting the privacy of patients across the country (HIPAAps.com, 2003), it also leaves much room for interpretation in the course of day-to-day practice. Dilemmas can arise, for example, when a nurse must balance the requirements of HIPAA with the best practices for a patient's health. Even without such a conflict, the HIPAA rules demand that nurses pay the highest respect to patients' private information.
Another potential situation arises if a nurse suspects medical identity theft — nurses are often well positioned to uncover such issues. A nurse may encounter a situation where they suspect a patient is not who they claim to be (Bendix, 2009). HIPAA compels action on the part of the institution. This can contradict, however, the nurse's code of ethics, including principles of equality, trust, and duty to the patient. In addition, the nurse must consider the consequences for the patient: even if the patient is committing fraud, they may genuinely need healthcare and be unable to obtain it through other means. The Nursing Code of Ethics states that "the nurse's primary commitment is to the patient." This means that any commitment to HIPAA, the healthcare provider, or any other body is subordinated to the commitment to the patient.
It is precisely the possibility of such ethical dilemmas that has caused considerable concern within the nursing profession regarding HIPAA. Certainly, when the law first came into effect in 2003, there was fear about its punitive aspects (Wielawski, 2009). From the perspective of the government and healthcare providers, HIPAA was a necessary step toward improving the management of patient privacy. The patchwork of state laws that preceded HIPAA was inconsistent at best and ineffective at worst. Proponents of HIPAA therefore insist that the measures taken to protect privacy are worth the additional burdens placed on institutions and healthcare staff, including nurses.
From the nurses' perspective, however, the issue was less about patient privacy than it was about the potential for sanctions that could befall nurses for minor privacy violations. It is not that nurses have ever had an ethical dilemma with respect to maintaining privacy — confidentiality and trust have always been part of the nursing profession. However, the potential for grey areas, and for situations where HIPAA differs from the Nursing Code of Ethics, caused considerable concern.
Many of the principles of nursing practice come into play when implementing HIPAA into the daily tasks of the profession. The nursing commitment to care depends on the development of trust between the nurse and the patient. In this regard, HIPAA and the profession are generally in agreement. Confidentiality, however, has proven a more complex issue. Wielawski (2009) relates an anecdote from a maternity nurse who found that after HIPAA was enacted, she was unable to discuss births with extended family members. This caused significant discord between the nurse and the public, arising from the fact that while HIPAA considers such discussions a violation of patient privacy, the patient may not share that view.
Another principle affected by HIPAA is that of abiding by a system of rules. With HIPAA introduced into that system, nurses like the maternity nurse described above were sometimes forced to choose the rules of the system over a perceived benefit to the patient.
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.