Human Relations and Equal Opportunity in the Workplace
This paper examines the field of human relations with a focus on equal opportunity in the modern workplace. It traces the origins of human relations from Frederick Taylor's scientific management approach to contemporary frameworks addressing diversity, inclusion, and unconscious bias. Drawing on social psychology, emotional intelligence theory, and organizational behavior literature, the paper defines the role of the Equal Opportunity Representative (EOR), outlines their core responsibilities, and analyzes how social change—including movements such as MeToo and evolving gender identity norms—shapes compliance demands. The paper critiques current EOR practice, identifies gaps related to unconscious bias, and offers recommendations for improvement, including stronger emotional intelligence and proactive cultural monitoring.
- Introduction: Origins and modern purpose of human relations
- Literature Review: Social change, teamwork theory, bias, emotional intelligence
- Equal Opportunity Representative: Definition and Responsibilities: EOR role definition and core duties
- Role of the EOR in Social Change: How EORs navigate evolving social norms
- Needs and Critique of EORs: Gaps and weaknesses in current EOR practice
- Recommendations and Critical Reflection: Improvement strategies and personal professional learning
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates multiple disciplinary lenses—social psychology, organizational theory, and applied ethics—to build a coherent argument about the EOR's function in the modern workplace.
- Concrete examples, such as the Southwest Airlines workplace culture and the prayer-room inclusion dilemma, ground abstract concepts in recognizable organizational scenarios.
- The personal reflection section is candid and specific, connecting coursework to real professional development in a way that adds credibility and voice.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a literature review to establish theoretical grounding before moving into applied analysis. By first surveying human relations theory, social psychology of teamwork, and emotional intelligence research, the author creates a conceptual framework that makes the subsequent critique of EOR practice feel evidence-based rather than opinion-driven. This "theory-then-application" structure is a hallmark of professional and graduate-level applied research writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a historical and conceptual introduction to human relations, then conducts a literature review covering social change theory, teamwork models, emotional intelligence, and unconscious bias. The application section defines the EOR role, examines responsibilities, and analyzes how social change creates new compliance demands. A critique section identifies weaknesses in current EOR practice, followed by targeted recommendations. The paper closes with a personal critical reflection on the author's own professional development.
Introduction
Human relations is an interdisciplinary field that focuses on the intersection of communications, psychology, sociology, and management to better understand how individuals and workers interact and engage in personal and professional relationships. The field emerged in the 19th century when industrialization was expanding rapidly in the West. Researchers focused on ways of maximizing potential, understanding human relations activities, and the various types of motivation. Frederick Taylor was a leading researcher who is today known as the father of the scientific management approach: he focused on maximizing efficiency, minimizing waste, decreasing the amount of required labor, and producing a streamlined approach to human relations that was more science-driven than humane (Locke, 1982). While Taylor helped introduce the idea that all human interactions could be understood by processing data and crunching numbers, the reality is that human relations are complex and human beings require a great deal of empathy and sympathy, no matter what the numbers and statistics say.
Today the core concepts, competencies, and principles of human relations focus on building and fostering relationships in order to create a healthy and dynamic work environment where people will want to be employed. In the 21st century there is a need for human relations because globalization and technology have made workplaces more diverse than ever before. With so much diversity come certain challenges, such as how to ensure that there are no generational, gender, ethnic, or racial biases permeating the workplace and causing divisions (Downey, van der Werff, Thomas, & Plaut, 2015). Human relations is needed today to ensure efficiency and healthy interaction among employees and stakeholders in the organization. To ensure such, there is a need to emphasize equal opportunity and to make sure there is an equal opportunity for employment and success for all workers. This paper focuses on human relations and Equal Opportunity Representatives (EORs) to show where they can improve and what needs to be done to advance the field of human relations this century.
References
Alpert, G. P., Noble, J. J., & Rojek, J. (2015). Solidarity and the code of silence. Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings, 106–121.
Altındağ, E., & Kösedağ, Y. (2015). The relationship between emotional intelligence of managers, innovative corporate culture and employee performance. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 270–282.
Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136.
Downey, S. N., van der Werff, L., Thomas, K. M., & Plaut, V. C. (2015). The role of diversity practices and inclusion in promoting trust and employee engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(1), 35–44.
Locke, E. A. (1982). The ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 14–24.
Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
O'Connor, E. (1999). Minding the workers: The meaning of 'human' and 'human relations' in Elton Mayo. Organization, 6(2), 223–246.
Onet. (2018). Equal opportunity representatives. Retrieved from https://www.onetonline.org/link/summary/13-1041.03
Perry, J. A., & Perry, E. K. (2016). Contemporary society. New York: Routledge.
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 138–158.
Smith, D. (2018). Performance management for the 21st century: The seismic shift to regular performance coaching. Grosvenor House Publishing.
Sycara, K., & Sukthankar, G. (2006). Literature review of teamwork models. Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 31.
Zastrow, C., & Kirst-Ashman, K. K. (2013). Understanding human behavior and the social environment. Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.