Hydraulic Fracturing's Environmental Impact and Seismic Risks
This paper examines the environmental consequences of hydraulic fracturing ("fracking"), with particular focus on the surge of induced seismic activity across the central and eastern United States. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature and policy analysis, the paper explains the mechanics of horizontal hydraulic fracturing, outlines the dangers fracking-induced earthquakes pose to critical infrastructure such as dams and levees, and critiques the failure of regulatory agencies to update building codes and seismic hazard maps accordingly. The paper concludes that the energy gains achieved through fracking do not justify the environmental and public safety costs imposed on affected communities.
- Introduction: Fracking-induced earthquakes alarm Midwest residents
- How Hydraulic Fracturing Works: Chemicals, water, and sand fracture shale deposits
- Environmental and Seismic Risks of Fracking: Fracking threatens dams, levees, and public safety
- Policy Failures and Ongoing Concerns: Industry extraction methods cause more harm than good
- Conclusion: Energy gains do not justify fracking's true costs
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Integrates both technical explanation (how fracking works mechanically) and policy critique (why regulations have failed to respond), giving the argument two complementary dimensions.
- Uses direct quotations from peer-reviewed sources and policy reporting to anchor each claim, ensuring the argument is grounded in cited evidence rather than assertion alone.
- Frames the issue within a recognizable national context — post-9/11 energy independence concerns — which broadens the paper's relevance beyond purely environmental discourse.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates source synthesis: rather than treating each citation in isolation, the author weaves together a geologist's technical description, a law review article on infrastructure risk, and an economics journal's cost-benefit framing to build a unified argument. This multi-disciplinary approach shows how a single policy problem can be illuminated from scientific, legal, and economic angles simultaneously.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a problem statement situating the issue geographically and regulatory context. A combined review-and-discussion section covers the mechanics of fracking and its documented harms. The conclusion pivots to the energy-independence debate before delivering a cost-benefit verdict. The Works Cited follows MLA conventions with print and web source distinctions noted.
Introduction
People living in the Midwestern United States — and most especially in Oklahoma — have become increasingly alarmed by the number of earthquakes they have experienced in recent years due to the efforts of the oil and gas industry to extract petroleum from the ground using hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") technologies. On the one hand, these efforts can be viewed as laudable since they optimize the amount of natural energy available; on the other hand, these extraction methods have caused unprecedented earthquake activity in regions that had not experienced significant seismic events for more than a century.
What is particularly problematic is the fact that regulatory agencies have failed to implement effective policies that could potentially prevent these human-made disasters. According to a recent report by Cook (2015), "Although injection-induced earthquakes have become commonplace across broad swaths of the central and eastern United States over the last few years, building codes — and the national seismic hazard map used to update them — don't currently take this increased hazard into account" (1). To determine the facts of this situation, this paper reviews the relevant literature concerning the practice of hydraulic fracturing and its potential impact on the environment.
How Hydraulic Fracturing Works
The processes involved in horizontal hydraulic fracturing are relatively straightforward. Fracking requires that a mixture of various chemicals, water, and sand be injected into oil and gas wells that have been depleted, in order to recover natural gas and oil from shale deposits (Beckrich 10). This mixture — termed "fracking fluid" — is injected at high pressure underground to fracture the shale and release the trapped natural gas and oil deposits (Beckrich 11).
Works Cited
Beckrich, Amanda. "Fracking for Natural Gas." The Science Teacher 79.6 (2012): 10–13. Print.
Booher, Jacob. "Fracking-Caused Earthquakes: How Alleged Threats Could Trigger the Corps of Engineers' Section 10 Jurisdiction." Environmental Law 45.1 (2015): 235–240. Print.
Cook, Terri. "Fracking's Hidden Hazards." NOVA Next, 22 Apr. 2015. Web.
Rousu, Matthew C., and Dave Ramsaran. "Guidelines for Conducting Economic Impact Studies on Fracking." International Advances in Economic Research 21.2 (2015): 213–215. Print.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.