This paper examines individual factors that influence student academic performance in ethnically-specific and culturally-specific university courses. It argues that variables such as intimidation, family influences, personal biases, and comfort of connection significantly shape how students engage with and succeed in these programs. The paper establishes operational definitions for race, ethnicity, and academic performance, then proposes two competing hypotheses: that students from the represented group perform better due to familiarity and cultural investment, or worse due to antagonism or disconnect with course design. The analysis emphasizes the critical role of group and individual identity in academic outcomes and suggests implications for curriculum development and understanding identity formation in higher education.
Many universities offer courses or entire major programs focused on culturally or ethnically specific areas such as Asian Studies or African-American Studies. While these courses provide rich and valuable scholastic insight and allow all students to make meaningful academic inquiry, individual factors may significantly affect student performance. The most notable variables that might impact student achievement in ethnically-specific or culturally-specific courses at the university level include intimidation, family and cultural influences, personal biases, and the comfort of connection to course content and community.
The relationship between academic performance in these courses and individual variables like intimidation, family influences, biases, and the comfort of connection presents unique and important implications for academia. Research in this area could potentially examine the effectiveness of ethnic or cultural programs of study and reveal potential biases in how these courses are being taught. Moreover, research could illuminate factors for improving course curricula and content development.
From a sociological point of view, research in this area would lend insight into identity development and in-group status. Importantly, there are differences between how a racial or ethnic group is perceived by outsiders, how that group perceives itself, and how that group believes itself to be perceived by outsiders. Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing inclusive and effective educational environments.
The operational definitions of race and ethnicity must be clearly established at the onset of research for optimal validity and reliability. Given that most anthropologists and biologists agree that race does not exist as a biological category, an operational definition of race would best depend on how a group has been labeled rather than by any objective measure such as skin color (Sussman, 2014). Ethnicity could likewise be defined as the group to which an individual believes himself or herself to be a part of, based on self-identification and self-reports.
This type of definition would help eliminate problems that could otherwise arise with persons from mixed racial or ethnic backgrounds. Generally, if a person identifies strongly enough with a racial or ethnic group to have that identity impact academic performance in a class, then the cultural, ethnic, or racial designator would apply. To measure academic performance, multiple indicators are necessary: rate and extent of class participation, attendance records, and course grades would all be important factors in creating a comprehensive assessment.
"Competing theories on identity and course performance"
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.