This paper examines African centered education as a response to the Eurocentric miseducation critiqued by Carter Woodson and other scholars. It traces the philosophical and historical roots of white supremacist ideology embedded in western curricula, explains how an African centered curriculum can be implemented in composition and broader educational settings, and outlines the goals of such an education in terms of color, culture, and consciousness. The paper argues that restoring Africa's proper place in history benefits not only African-American students but all of humanity, and that African centered education is fundamentally anti-racist and humanizing rather than separatist.
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis of multiple scholarly perspectives around a single thesis. Rather than summarizing each source in isolation, the writer weaves Woodson, Carruthers, Richardson, ya Salaam, and Asante into a cumulative argument, with each source contributing a distinct dimension — historical critique, pedagogical practice, philosophical justification, and identity formation — that builds toward a coherent whole.
The paper opens with a theoretical framing drawn from Woodson, then moves to the practical question of curriculum implementation, followed by a historically grounded argument for why African centered education matters. A dedicated section outlines the goals of the curriculum through the lens of color, culture, and consciousness. The conclusion reframes African centered education as a humanizing rather than separatist project, closing the argument on a broad, inclusive note.
In The Miseducation of the Negro, Carter Woodson (2000) argues that the education provided to African-Americans ignored or undervalued African historical experiences while overvaluing European history and culture. This caused the alienation of African-Americans, who became dissociated from themselves as their links to their own culture and traditions were severed. Woodson argued that this type of education caused African-Americans to reject their own heritage while positioning them not at the center of European culture, but rather at its margins. He predicted that such an education would result in the psychological and cultural decline of the African-American people.
For Woodson and many others, the solution to this problem could be found in the development of an educational system that responded to African-Americans. This model, built on the tradition of historically Black colleges, would teach both the history and culture of Africa alongside that of the United States.
A variety of proposals were offered by prominent members of the Black community regarding the nature and purposes of an educational system best suited to the specific conditions of African-Americans in the United States. Woodson introduced a new dimension to this discussion when he described the potentially detrimental effects of a Eurocentric educational model on African identity and heritage, and when he called for a greater African presence in the curriculum.
Advocates of African centered education argue that a curriculum providing more equitable treatment of African culture — allowing greater presence to African history, recognizing African values and achievements, and acknowledging white oppression — reduces bias, prejudice, racism, arrogance, and intolerance among white students, and would improve the self-esteem, self-respect, and humanity of Black students (Woodson, 2000).
On the other hand, opponents of African centered education argue that it produces unnecessary divisiveness and tensions among racial groups, and that it transforms history from an academic discipline into a form of psychological therapy aimed at raising the self-esteem of minority groups. Proponents counter that history is not neutral, and that African centered education is not anti-white, but anti-racist and anti-oppression.
This paper examines African centered education in an effort to reveal what it is, how it works, how it can be implemented, and why it is important.
The implementation of an African centered curriculum is a complicated issue due to the complex past and present circumstances of African-Americans (Richardson, 2000). In their quest for equality and freedom, African-Americans have taken a variety of positions regarding how to succeed in America. For students, success equates to good academic performance. However, the diversity within the African-American community comes with many diverse ideologies and class intersections.
For the most part, all African-Americans attend private and public schools that carry centuries of embedded stereotypes (Richardson, 2000). Most find it difficult to escape the experience of miseducation. For as many African-Americans who enter college prepared for the challenge, a greater number enter the collegiate environment completely unprepared. In the majority of American colleges, African-American students face another four years of miseducation.
Miseducation can be defined as the "uplifting of the dominant society that inadvertently works to the demise of the oppressed people in the society" (Richardson, 2000). Therefore, one of the most basic ideas of African centered education is that there is great value in knowing, and that there is an important African orientation to knowledge. The promotion of multicultural and African centered education should not be seen as an effort to remove the best that western education has to offer, but rather as an expansion of its knowledge base.
The African centered composition curriculum is considered a step toward reversing the basis of African-American students' literacy lag (Richardson, 2000). The written literacy acquisition of students from the African American Vernacular English (AAVE) culture is greatly lacking compared to students from the dominant culture. AAVE students are still placed disproportionately in college-level remedial writing courses. In addition, research reveals that African-Americans have one of the lowest college completion rates among ethnic minority groups.
While a variety of factors contribute to this literacy lag, the cultural gap is one that may be more easily resolved. The cultural gap has been well documented in the English composition classroom.
According to Richardson (2000): "An African-centered pedagogy is needed in composition to make students aware of the talents they already have and to maintain and build on the culture that nurtured them. In this regard, all African-American students who have lived in America for any length of time are members of the AAVE culture because of the collective and individual identity negotiation involved in the Black experience."
The African centered composition curriculum is rooted in Afrocentricity, which serves as its general basis. Afrocentricity is best described as "an inclusive approach to phenomena that encourages knowledge and centeredness of self." A pedagogy based on this tradition seeks to blend the self and the subject of study — in this case, literacy education — acknowledging self and subject as inseparable.
According to Richardson (2000): "Education for African-American students is predicated on the assumption that one is at once subject and agent of his or her experience. From this perspective, African-American students' literacy education should involve their experiences and be experienced by them."
African centered education is not a matter of color. It examines any information involving African people and raises questions that enable Africans to be subjects of historical experiences rather than objects on the fringes of another's experience. For example, an Afrocentric view of African conditions during enslavement would view the people not as "slaves" but as "Africans" — a shift that ensures a different mental orientation, providing a new perspective and attitude closer to the reality of the people (Asante, 1991).
You’re 37% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.