This paper examines a business ethics scenario in which Sandwich Blitz faces pressure from a government inspector offering to overlook health code violations in exchange for catering services. Using Sherman's Eight Steps toward Integrity framework, the paper argues that company leadership must prioritize doing the right thing, taking personal responsibility, and defining clear organizational values. The analysis demonstrates how ethical decision-making, transparency, and leading by example strengthen both individual character and organizational reputation.
Integrity is a cornerstone of business ethics in modern organizations. Sandwich Blitz currently faces a test of integrity and leadership when a manager reports that a government health inspector has offered to approve a violation of new local health codes in exchange for catering services to his department's holiday party. This scenario places Dalman and Lei at a crossroads where their decisions will define not only their personal character but also their organization's values and reputation.
In Sherman's article Rethinking Integrity, one of the eight steps toward integrity is articulated as "Doing the right thing: With the awareness of what's right comes the obligation of right action. That means embodying our convictions—and accepting the consequences." After examining Sherman's framework and its application to this case, it is clear that Dalman should follow three critical steps: doing the right thing, taking responsibility, and defining organizational rules and values. These steps will enable Sandwich Blitz to navigate this challenge with integrity intact.
Doing the right thing is the first essential step toward integrity, and it requires a clear understanding of what is right and wrong. A good leader embodies strong values and guides employees through personal example. In this situation, Dalman must obey the new health codes, regardless of the inspector's offer. Violating the code would undermine his credibility and set a dangerous precedent for the organization.
The manager who reported this bribery attempt has already demonstrated integrity by choosing to do the right thing. He could have accepted the inspector's offer, avoided the paperwork and procedures required to correct the violation, and resolved the immediate problem quietly. Instead, he fulfilled his obligation to act ethically, even though it created additional work. This decision exemplifies the character and initiative that companies must cultivate and reward. By reporting the issue rather than participating in the bribe, the manager has shown that ethical decision-making is central to Sandwich Blitz's culture. When leadership acknowledges and praises such choices, employees understand that integrity is not negotiable.
Taking responsibility is the second critical step. To take responsibility means accepting complete ownership of one's actions and the circumstances that arise from them. In Sherman's framework, this means recognizing personal accountability without blaming external forces or other people. As Sherman explains in the article, "Acknowledge our complete, sole responsibility for every one of our actions. No more seeing other people and outside events as the cause of our problems. Blame no one, accept the behavior of others and the circumstances of our lives as givens, and proceed from there."
In this case, the inspector is offering a shortcut that would benefit Sandwich Blitz in the short term but would compromise its integrity. Dalman must take ownership of the violation and commit to resolving it through legitimate means. The solutions are practical: reducing the size of the dumpster or removing its covering to comply with the new zoning requirements. By taking personal responsibility rather than accepting the bribe, Dalman demonstrates that ethical responsibility is his priority. This accountability will earn respect from his staff and strengthen trust throughout the organization.
The third step is defining clear rules and values. When an organization establishes explicit ethical standards, all employees can align their behavior accordingly. There is no ambiguity, no room for miscommunication, and no excuse for questionable decisions. Dalman should make it clear that Sandwich Blitz will comply fully with all health codes and will not engage in bribery or ethical shortcuts.
By setting this standard, Dalman sends a message to his entire management team and workforce that doing the right thing is non-negotiable. He should respectfully inform the inspector that Sandwich Blitz will move its dumpster or modify its placement to meet the new regulations. This public commitment to compliance demonstrates strength of character and provides a model for how other challenges should be handled. When managers enforce clear values consistently, employees develop confidence that the organization stands for something meaningful.
"Ethical choices sustain competitive advantage"
You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.