Kaiser Permanente Quality Assurance Program Overview
This paper examines Kaiser Permanente's quality assurance program, tracing the organization's origins in industrial-era prepaid healthcare and its evolution into a nationally recognized system for clinical quality measurement. The paper describes Kaiser Permanente's use of the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Quality Compass® and HEDIS® performance tools, its electronic medical records platform (HealthConnect®), and facility-specific achievements across multiple regions. It also addresses mandated quality reporting requirements and the role of peer review in sustaining continuous improvement. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of disseminating best practices to reduce medical error and improve patient outcomes.
- History and Origins of Kaiser Permanente: Founding story and prepaid healthcare model origins
- Quality Assurance Program and NCQA Standards: NCQA Quality Compass benchmarks and scorecard use
- Facility-Specific Quality Performance: Regional facility scores across clinical categories
- Electronic Health Records and Quality Improvement: HealthConnect system and practitioner impact on care
- Mandated Requirements of the Quality Program: HEDIS data collection areas and peer review
- Conclusion: Dissemination of best practices and patient safety
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the quality assurance discussion in historical context, giving readers a clear understanding of how Kaiser Permanente's model of prepaid care shaped its commitment to quality measurement.
- Cites specific, named performance tools (NCQA Quality Compass®, HEDIS®, HealthConnect®) and regional facility outcomes, adding concrete detail that supports its general claims.
- Integrates a peer-reviewed research finding (Laiteerapong et al., 2011) to support the argument that quality improvement processes measurably affect clinical practice.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses institutional sourcing alongside peer-reviewed evidence to build a credible account of a healthcare organization's quality program. By pairing organizational reports with an independent journal study, the writer demonstrates how to triangulate claims across source types — a useful technique in health administration writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a historical overview of Kaiser Permanente's founding, then transitions to its current quality assurance framework, covering NCQA accreditation, facility-level performance scores, the HealthConnect® electronic records system, and mandated HEDIS® reporting requirements. A brief conclusion ties the program's goals to broader patient safety concerns. The structure follows a logical progression from origin to present practice to policy implications, making it accessible for undergraduate health administration students.
History and Origins of Kaiser Permanente
Kaiser Permanente is a healthcare organization with origins in the pre-war industrial sector. The program initially offered healthcare for workers in steel mills, shipyards, and construction companies during a period when the nation was recovering from the Great Depression and seeking stability amid global conflict.
A young surgeon, Sidney Garfield, borrowed money to build Contractors General Hospital with the aim of serving the thousands of workers building the Los Angeles Aqueduct near Desert Center, in the middle of the Mojave Desert. The 12-bed hospital struggled to get insurance companies to pay for the treatment of injured and ill contractors. Some workers had no insurance at all, but Dr. Garfield treated them regardless, and the hospital's debts accumulated. With the help of a man named Harold Hatch, Dr. Garfield convinced insurance companies to pre-pay a set daily amount to cover contractors' care and treatment. This prepayment plan rescued the hospital's financial situation and allowed staff to focus on healthcare and prevention rather than simply treating injuries and illnesses.
The success of the hospital plan and the quality of care established a reputation for Dr. Garfield that led to replication of the model for workers at the Grand Coulee Dam and the Kaiser Shipyards in Richmond, California, where Liberty Ships were being built for World War II.
Quality Assurance Program and NCQA Standards
The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) is a private, non-profit organization whose mission is the improvement of healthcare quality. The NCQA uses a Quality Compass® to measure health plan performance. The quality measures used by the NCQA are evidence-based and represent the most widely used benchmarks applied to clinical quality in the United States ("Kaiser Permanente," 2009).
Kaiser Permanente has made NCQA standards the foundation of its own scorecard, benchmarking against eight measures from the NCQA Quality Compass® ("Kaiser Permanente," 2009). The attributes of Kaiser Permanente's healthcare teams and medical facilities have resulted in high scores across measures that include health promotion, disease prevention, state-of-the-art care delivery, and world-class chronic disease management ("Kaiser Permanente," 2009).
For its part, the NCQA has developed and maintains a system called HEDIS® (Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set), which is the performance measurement tool of choice for health plans in the United States, with more than 90% of healthcare organizations using the system ("Kaiser Permanente," 2009).
Facility-Specific Quality Performance
Different Kaiser Permanente facilities located across the country received particular recognition for top marks in specific clinical areas. Appropriate use of medications for patients with asthma earned praise for Kaiser Permanente of Colorado, while Kaiser Permanente Hawaii scored highest for breast cancer screening and diabetic nephropathy monitoring ("Quality Compass," 2009). Blood pressure control for diabetic patients was ranked highest for Kaiser Permanente of Northern California ("Quality Compass," 2009).
In Georgia, Kaiser Permanente performed exceptionally well in childhood immunization, including the DP/MMR combination, HIB, meningitis, chickenpox, hepatitis B, Chlamydia screening, and LDL screening in coronary artery disease patients ("Quality Compass," 2009). The variability in quality scores across a single institution reflects the rigor of the NCQA evaluation program ("Quality Compass," 2009).
Conclusion
Thompson and Moss (2008) report that "in a recent systematic review of case note review studies, over 9% of patients admitted to hospital are harmed by error" (p. i10). A primary goal of quality improvement initiatives is not only the identification of best practices in clinical and hospital settings, but also the dissemination of that information. By participating in a nationally accredited quality improvement and healthcare assessment system, Kaiser Permanente actively contributes to those dissemination efforts and to the broader aim of reducing preventable patient harm.
References
Kaiser Permanente leads the nation in eight quality measures. (2009, October 8). Clinical Excellence, Kaiser Permanente. Retrieved from http://xnet.kp.org/newscenter/clinicalexcellence/2009/100809qualitycompass.html
Quality Compass. (2009). National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA).
Thompson, R. G., & Moss, F. M. (2008). QIR and SQUIRE: Continuum of reporting guidelines for scholarly reports in healthcare improvement. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 17, i10–i12. doi:10.1136/qshc.2008.029074
Laiteerapong, N., Keh, C. E., Naylor, K. B., Yang, V. L., Vinci, L. M., Ovler, J. L., & Arora, V. M. (2011). A resident-led quality improvement initiative to improve obesity screening. American Journal of Medical Quality, 26(4), 315–322. doi:10.1177/1062860610395930
Continuous improvement and the expansion of quality measurement. (2011). National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Retrieved from
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.