Leadership Failures and Change Management at Mountain States Healthcare
This paper examines the organizational crisis at Mountain States Healthcare (MSH), a multi-state hospital system spanning Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, and Idaho. Following a consolidation of billing systems, newly appointed director Kyle Christensen's rigid, top-down leadership style triggered widespread employee dissatisfaction, staff turnover, and project delays. The paper analyzes two core failures — ineffective communication and inflexibility in management style — drawing on transformational leadership theory and change management literature. It concludes with recommendations for adopting a democratic leadership approach and improving organizational communication to achieve successful change outcomes.
- Overview of the Mountain States Healthcare Case: Background on MSH billing consolidation and key personnel
- Organizational Change and Leadership Challenges: Change management failures linked to Christensen's leadership
- Communication Failures and Resistance to Change: How poor communication fueled employee resistance
- Rigidity in Management and Its Consequences: Inflexibility causes staff departures and project delays
- Recommendations for Effective Leadership and Change Management: Democratic leadership and communication as solutions
- References: Academic sources cited throughout the paper
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly separates situation description from analysis, giving the argument a logical, two-stage structure that is easy to follow.
- Each analytical claim is grounded in a named academic source (e.g., Petrescu, 2011; Vigoda-Gadot & Drory, 2006), lending scholarly credibility to what could otherwise be purely descriptive commentary.
- The recommendations section directly mirrors the problems identified in the analysis — one recommendation per failure mode — creating a satisfying symmetry between diagnosis and prescription.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied case analysis: it takes a real organizational scenario, maps it onto established theoretical frameworks (transformational leadership, change resistance theory, managerial flexibility), and uses those frameworks to explain observed outcomes. This technique shows the writer's ability to connect abstract management concepts to concrete events, a core skill in business and organizational behavior coursework.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into three functional sections: a situation description that establishes the facts of the MSH case; an analytical section that diagnoses two root causes (poor communication and managerial rigidity) using academic literature; and a recommendations section that proposes corrective actions aligned with the diagnosed problems. The reference list follows APA formatting conventions and supports all cited claims throughout the body.
Overview of the Mountain States Healthcare Case
Mountain States Healthcare (MSH) is a hospital system spanning four states: Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, and Idaho. Following the acquisition of additional hospital units, MSH began experiencing a significant increase in administrative expenditures that were adversely affecting the organization's returns. To prevent future losses, Aaron Nelson, the Vice President of Technology, decided to consolidate the billing systems. This decision prompted a search for a director to lead the newly created directorate. The two primary candidates for the position were Kyle Christensen and Colleen Kennedy. Having previously worked under the VP, Christensen was selected.
Christensen's main approach was to follow his own agenda while avoiding input or information from other parties. The consequences were severe: the organization's situation deteriorated, as employee roles were cut, tasks were altered, and flexible scheduling was eliminated. These changes had an adverse impact on staff morale and performance (Cohen, n.d.).
Having successfully managed the state billing office, Colleen Kennedy made significant attempts to stabilize the situation among disgruntled personnel and repeatedly tried to contact Christensen to outline existing problems and potential solutions. For the most part, however, Christensen either ignored her meeting requests or attended without genuine interest. Matters worsened when the most proficient billing clerk announced she was leaving for another organization, followed by numerous other staff departures. These developments also caused delays to the software project schedule, placing the organization in an increasingly precarious position. Feeling that her ideas and contributions were being overlooked, Colleen ultimately submitted her 30-day notice to Christensen (Cohen, n.d.).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.