Legislation and Health Care Reform: Costs, Access, and DNP Leadership
This paper examines the role of federal and state legislation in shaping health care reform in the United States, with particular focus on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Drawing on peer-reviewed literature, it analyzes how the ACA has affected health care costs, access to services, and preventive care initiatives. The paper also explores how doctors of nursing practice (DNP)-prepared leaders can serve as transformational advocates for just and ethical health care policy, leveraging their clinical expertise and professional standards to educate the public, inform lawmakers, and mobilize community resources toward meaningful reform.
- Introduction: Scope and purpose of the paper
- The Role and Effect of Legislation in Health Care Reform: How federal and state laws shape health care
- The ACA's Impact on Costs, Access, and Preventive Care: ACA provisions reducing costs and improving access
- How DNP-Prepared Leaders Can Advocate for Health Care Reform: DNP leaders as transformational health policy advocates
- Conclusion: Summary of legislative and DNP advocacy findings
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates peer-reviewed citations throughout to support each major claim, lending credibility to its policy arguments without relying on anecdote.
- It connects two distinct but related topics — legislative reform and nursing leadership — through a logical argument that builds from systemic analysis to practical implications.
- The use of direct quotations from authoritative sources (e.g., Gable, 2011; Grace, 2018) is well chosen, with each quote clearly introduced and contextualized rather than dropped in without framing.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective literature synthesis: rather than summarizing sources one by one, it weaves multiple authors' findings into a unified analytical narrative. For example, the discussion of the ACA draws on Gable, Morone, and Cutler et al. in sequence to build a multi-faceted picture of the legislation's impact, moving from broad regulatory significance to specific programmatic outcomes.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a clear three-part structure: (1) an introduction that defines scope and purpose; (2) two body sections — one analyzing the legislative landscape and one examining DNP advocacy roles; and (3) a conclusion that synthesizes findings. This organizational transparency, with explicit signposting of what each section will cover, is characteristic of graduate-level health policy writing and makes the argument easy to follow.
Introduction
Although the health care network in the United States is heavily privatized, and reforms have historically been responses to changes in demand and the need for greater efficiencies in the delivery of medical services, federal and state laws also exert a significant influence on health care reform. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature concerning the role of legislation in health care reform and its effect on health care costs. In addition, the paper analyzes how doctors of nursing practice (DNP)-prepared leaders can develop strategies to advocate for just and ethical practices in health care policy and health care delivery systems. A summary of the findings that emerged from the research is provided in the conclusion.
The Role and Effect of Legislation in Health Care Reform
The health care system in the United States has historically been profit-driven, and the private sector's responses to new pressures for innovation — delivering new services and developing cost-effective efficiencies — have invariably been influenced by market forces. These types of responses can be discerned, for example, in the manner in which tertiary health care facilities introduce new medical devices and interventions as research progresses. Nevertheless, it is clear that federal and state laws also have a profound influence on health care and any efforts to reform the manner in which it is delivered. Indeed, Forest and Stoltz (2022) emphasize that "legislation is a tool of public action in health policy" (p. 1). In some cases, legislation designed to implement beneficial reforms involves improving the information available to health care consumers and practitioners, thereby making medical care more efficient (Cutler et al., 2019).
In other cases, however, legislative reforms are more broad-based. Perhaps the most visible and influential legislation that has introduced reforms in the nation's health care network is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). According to Gable (2011), "The ACA set in motion a wide range of programs that substantially affected the health system in the United States and signifies a moderate but important regulatory shift in the role of the federal government in public health" (p. 340). This regulatory shift reflects the public sector's legislative response to increased demand for health care services, the recognition that more cost-effective strategies are required, and the nation's increasingly diverse and rapidly aging population.
The ACA's Impact on Costs, Access, and Preventive Care
While some provisions of the ACA address health care insurance and financing — and therefore the costs of health care for American consumers — the legislation also establishes a number of initiatives intended to improve public health in general. As a result, Gable (2011) concludes that "The ACA has the potential to produce extensive public health benefits across the United States population by improving access to health care and services and reducing costs" (p. 341). Notwithstanding the ongoing debate over specific provisions of the ACA and how they should be administered at the state and local levels, this legislation has already made a major impact on reducing health care costs and making services more accessible (Morone, 2020).
Although not all of the reforms implemented by the ACA have been widely publicized — and many American consumers and even health care practitioners may be unaware of their significance — they have been highly effective in introducing preventive care strategies that can help reduce future health care costs. For example, Morone (2020) points out that "The ACA made a great many health systems reforms. Hospitals were given incentives to reduce infections, adopt electronic medical records, and reduce readmissions. The plan even included nutrition labeling requirements" (p. 759).
In sum, legislation has a direct effect on the cost and quality of health care in the United States in multiple ways, and new opportunities for reform are constantly being identified as research reveals more cost-effective, evidence-based interventions. This is not to say that simply passing a well-intentioned law will achieve its goals overnight, but in a profit-driven health care environment, informed and timely legislation represents an important part of the nation's health care network. Another important part of that network today is the growing cadre of doctors of nursing practice who can serve as influential advocates for reform.
Conclusion
The research showed that the profit-driven nature of the American health care system has led to the need for legislative reforms, such as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which has helped improve access to health care services and reduce costs. The ACA has also introduced preventive care strategies, including hospital incentives to reduce infections and readmissions, as well as nutrition labeling requirements. The research further showed that DNP-prepared leaders can serve as advocates for health care reform by educating the public and lawmakers about the need for reforms, mobilizing community resources, and serving as transformational leaders. The American Association of Nurse Practitioners mandates that nurse practitioners provide health promotion, disease prevention, health education, and counseling to individuals, families, groups, and communities in addition to their clinical role. In sum, DNP-prepared leaders possess the expertise and training needed to help improve the nation's health care network, and they also have a professional responsibility to do so.
References
Cutler, D. M., Davis, K., & Stremikis, K. (2019). The impact of health reform on health system spending. The Commonwealth Fund Issue Brief, 1405(88), 1–14.
Forest, P.-G., & Stoltz, L. (2022). The CHA and beyond: The role of legislation in national reform in health care. School of Public Policy Publications, 15(3), 1–23.
Gable, L. (2011). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, public health, and the elusive target of human rights. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 39(3), 340–354.
Grace, P. (2018, January 31). Enhancing nurse moral agency: The leadership promise of doctor of nursing practice preparation. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(1), 1–12.
Hoyle, C., & Johnson, G. (2015). Building skills in organizational and systems changes: A DNP-FNP clinical curriculum. The Nurse Practitioner, 40(4), 14–23.
Morone, J. A. (2020). Diminishing democracy in health policy: Partisanship, the courts, and the end of health politics as we knew it. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(5), 757–769.
Standards of Practice for Nurse Practitioners. (2023). American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Retrieved from https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacy-resource/position-statements/standards-of-practice-for-nurse-practitioners
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.