Women, Disability, and Health Care Privatization in Canada
This paper explores the social policy consequences of healthcare privatization and downloading in Canada, drawing on Pat Armstrong's analysis of the Medicare system. It examines how shifting healthcare from public to private delivery undermines women's access to care and their employment in the sector. The paper also addresses the impact of privatization and de-institutionalization on disabled persons, the failure of the proposed guaranteed annual income, and the racialization of Canadian drug policy. The author argues that these policy changes represent violations of human rights and democratic principles, particularly for women, Aboriginal peoples, disabled persons, and racialized communities.
- Introduction: Medicare and Women's Stake in Public Healthcare: Medicare's benefits for women as workers and patients
- How Privatization and Downloading Undermine Women: Six mechanisms by which privatization harms women
- Disabled Persons, De-institutionalization, and the Worthy Poor: Privatization reduces self-sufficiency for disabled persons
- Guaranteed Annual Income: A Failed Proposal: GAI proposal rejected as too costly for government
- Racialization of Canadian Drug Policy: Drug policy targets racialized communities through policing
- Conclusion: Human Rights and the Costs of Privatization: Privatization as human rights violation and anti-democratic
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a structured list to clearly break down the multiple dimensions of privatization's impact, making a complex policy shift accessible and organized.
- It connects several distinct social policy issues — women's healthcare, disability rights, and racialized drug policy — under a unifying critique of privatization, demonstrating analytical breadth.
- The conclusion takes a clear normative stance, framing policy failures as human rights violations, which gives the argument moral weight and a strong closing position.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of secondary source synthesis: the author draws on Armstrong's framework to anchor the healthcare argument, then extends the critique to disability and drug policy using additional sources. This shows students how to build a cumulative argument from multiple readings rather than treating each source in isolation.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of Medicare's benefits for women before privatization, then systematically lists the mechanisms of privatization and their consequences. It pivots to disability policy and the failed guaranteed annual income proposal, then addresses the racialization of drug policy. The conclusion ties these threads together with a human rights framing. The progression moves from specific (women's care) to broader systemic critique (race, disability, democracy).
Introduction: Medicare and Women's Stake in Public Healthcare
Pat Armstrong, in Chapter Thirteen, makes the case for the advantages women had with the Medicare system intact. Healthcare in Canada has been what Armstrong calls "a shining example of a universal program that has worked to reduce inequalities" in terms of access to care for women (Armstrong, 333). Not only did the Medicare system provide women with excellent access to care, but four out of five healthcare workers are female, meaning the system also provided significant employment for women. Armstrong (p. 334) reports, however, that "fundamental transformations" in the healthcare system are occurring, with the effect of "undermining both women's access to care and women's work in care" — and that transformation is privatization.
How Privatization and Downloading Undermine Women
Privatization and downloading refer to policy changes that essentially remove the public aspect from healthcare delivery and reconstitute it as a private enterprise. The ramifications of shifting healthcare services out of the public sphere and into private hands include:
a) the burden of paying for services is shifted from government to individuals; b) healthcare service centers are being run by for-profit companies; c) care for women now falls outside the purview of public institutions and into for-profit community organizations and "private households"; d) the strategies for delivering healthcare services are now based on private-sector concepts; e) the actual work of providing care to women moves from public-sector healthcare workers to "unpaid caregivers"; and f) healthcare has become a commodity governed by market rules, rather than an essential human service provided by government (Armstrong, 334).
The bottom line in terms of the impact on women is that "privatization by stealth" has meant that caregivers face "deteriorating conditions for work." Because most of those giving and receiving care are women, Armstrong concludes that "women are losing the most" (Armstrong, 353).
Disabled Persons, De-institutionalization, and the Worthy Poor
Bach and Rioux use the phrase "Back to notions of the worthy poor" to highlight that, before child labour laws and child welfare legislation came into being, disabled people were not necessarily considered "worthy" of government aid. With the advent of new policies introducing privatization and de-institutionalization, Bach and Rioux suggest that the chances for disabled persons to be self-sufficient and earn their own way have diminished significantly (Module 10).
Conclusion: Human Rights and the Costs of Privatization
What concerns me about the healthcare system is that privatization has hurt services for women, for disabled people, and for First Nations people. Human rights are being violated when the possibility of self-determination is not offered to Aboriginal people, disabled people, and those who have faced discrimination based on ethnicity or racial background. If these privatization and other policy changes are being carried out to save money for the national government, they are inhumane at the very least and anti-democratic at the worst.
Works Cited
Armstrong, Pat. Health Care "Reform" — Privatization and Its Impact on Women.
Module 10 — Health.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.