This paper examines the concept of marginal analysis as a foundational tool in economic theory, applicable to both microeconomic and macroeconomic contexts. It explains marginal change, marginal costs, and marginal benefits, and traces how these concepts relate to utilitarian principles of maximizing societal welfare. The paper illustrates how consumers, firms, and policymakers use marginal analysis to make optimal decisions under conditions of scarcity. Practical examples — including consumer purchasing decisions, healthcare and education trade-offs, and agricultural technology adoption — demonstrate how comparing marginal benefits to marginal costs enables decision-makers to allocate scarce resources effectively and maximize net benefits.
A popular concept used in both macroeconomic and microeconomic theory is that of marginal change. Marginal analysis is therefore one of the most important principles of economic theory, and one must understand several foundational concepts before proceeding. Marginal change can be explained as a small addition or subtraction, in proportional comparison, to the total quantity of some variable. Marginal analysis, by extension, can be described as the study of the relationships brought about by marginal changes in related economic variables. In microeconomic theory, marginal concepts are utilized primarily to explain several forms of optimizing behavior. For example, consumers are said to maximize their utility or satisfaction, while companies are said to maximize their profits (Johnson, 2005).
In economic theory, it is often stated that where only a limited quantity of resources is available, one cannot have everything one wants, which means that tough choices must be made. Every time one is forced to make a choice, something else must be given up. Economic theory, on the basis of marginal analysis, offers a framework upon which to base such decisions: the best decision can be made by effectively weighing the marginal benefits against the marginal costs involved.
It must also be remembered that economic theory is often grounded in the philosophy of utilitarianism, which reiterates the principle of "the greatest good for the greatest number" ("Marginal analysis," n.d.). This means that one must be able to make decisions with the objective of maximizing societal welfare ("Marginal analysis," n.d.).
Although this type of choice may be straightforward at times, it can be extremely difficult at others. Consider a customer deciding which new car to purchase: this person would make a decision based on personal preferences, provided the choice stays within a fixed budget. This customer would have maximized utility by purchasing what he likes best within his means — a simple utilization of the utilitarian principle. At other times, the decision may not be so easy. For example, when deciding an issue in healthcare: must the elderly be denied vital care so that the young can receive better care? Similarly, must urban children have better educational facilities at the cost of depriving rural children of basic education? The principle of "the greatest good for the greatest number" is therefore directly related to how one defines and quantifies "good," making it imperative to first understand the concepts of marginal costs and marginal benefits ("Marginal analysis," n.d.).
Marginal costs — that is, the additional costs imposed when one more unit of a product is manufactured — can be illustrated with a simple example. If the cost of making nine pieces of pizza is $90, and the cost of making ten pieces is $110, then the marginal cost of producing the tenth piece is $20. Total costs will always increase as production increases, though marginal costs may not rise at the same rate. When marginal costs do rise, it can be explained by considering what happens when a firm becomes very large: costs rise alongside the growing difficulties of managing the organization.
Another example illustrates this point well: when a mandate is passed requiring cleaner air and a cleaner environment, the task is relatively simple at the outset, because the dirtiest vehicles can be taken off the roads. However, once this is accomplished, the mission becomes progressively more difficult, and newer technology may be required to continue the process — making it clear that marginal costs will rise. Marginal benefits, on the other hand, can be explained as the additional advantages obtained when one more unit is produced. These benefits can be expressed in two ways: as units of utility, or as satisfaction with the product ("Marginal analysis," n.d.).
"Shows how choices adjust existing situations at the margin"
"Step-by-step process for performing marginal analysis"
"Consumer and agricultural examples of marginal analysis"
N.A. (n.d.). "Marginal analysis." Retrieved December 15, 2007, from
You’re 38% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.