Marijuana Laws, Usage, and Public Attitudes Over 50 Years
This paper examines the dramatic transformation in marijuana use, public opinion, and legislation in the United States over roughly fifty years. Drawing on survey data from the Shafer Commission, Gallup polls, and household drug-use surveys, the paper traces rising usage rates from the 1960s through the 1990s, broken down by age, race, and ethnicity. It then documents the sharp shift in public attitudes toward legalization and contrasts the regulatory approaches of individual states — particularly Colorado and Texas — with the continued federal classification of cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance. The paper argues that state-level policy is increasingly outpacing federal law.
- Introduction: A Half-Century of Change: Overview of shifting marijuana laws and attitudes
- Early Survey Data on Marijuana Use: Shafer Commission and 1960s–70s usage statistics
- Marijuana Use in the 1990s: Household survey data by age, race, and frequency
- Shifting Public Attitudes Toward Legalization: Gallup poll trends from 1969 to 2014
- Federal Law vs. State Legalization: Schedule I status versus growing state-level legalization
- Colorado and Texas: A Tale of Two Policies: Tax revenue versus criminal penalties compared
- Conclusion: Federal policy lag behind state and scientific consensus
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Strong use of longitudinal data — the paper sequences survey findings across decades, making the trend in usage rates and public opinion immediately visible to the reader.
- The Colorado–Texas contrast is a well-chosen rhetorical move that grounds abstract policy debate in concrete fiscal and criminal-justice consequences.
- The paper stays disciplined in scope, covering usage statistics, attitude shifts, and legal landscape without sprawling into unrelated territory.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-based policy analysis: it marshals quantitative survey data (Gallup polls, the Shafer Commission, Household Survey figures) alongside journalistic sources to build a chronological argument. Rather than relying on opinion alone, each claim about changing attitudes or usage rates is anchored to a named study or poll, giving the argument measurable credibility.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction, then presents two major blocks of historical data (pre-1990s and 1990s usage). It pivots to attitude data via Gallup polls, moves into the current legal landscape at the federal and state level, and closes with a pointed state-by-state comparison before a brief conclusion. This chronological-then-comparative structure keeps the argument easy to follow.
Introduction: A Half-Century of Change
The difference between laws regarding marijuana in the 1950s and 1960s and public attitudes — and usage — regarding marijuana today is striking. Usage, laws, and attitudes regarding marijuana (or cannabis) have dramatically changed over the past forty to fifty years. This paper uses survey data and journalistic research to present the sweeping changes in laws, usage, and public attitudes surrounding marijuana.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.