Mass Media Influence on Youth Smoking and Digital Media
This paper examines the multifaceted influence of mass media on public behavior, with a particular focus on adolescent smoking. Drawing on peer-reviewed research, it explores how antismoking campaigns have affected youth smoking rates, how the "influence of presumed influence" (IPI) model explains peer-mediated media effects, and how portrayals of smoking in film and television shape adolescent attitudes. The paper also surveys the history of digital communication technologies and briefly addresses unethical advertising practices. Together, these sources illustrate how media messages — both prosocial and harmful — interact with social perceptions to produce measurable behavioral outcomes.
- Media's Role in Shaping Society: Media shapes national politics and social relationships
- Antismoking Campaigns and Adolescent Smoking Rates: Declining youth smoking rates amid ongoing media campaigns
- Peer Perception and the Influence of Presumed Influence Model: How peer perceptions mediate media effects on adolescents
- Is Smoking Viewed as Filthy or Fashionable by Youth?: Focus groups reveal smoking seen as cool in media portrayals
- Quantifying Pro-Smoking Media Effects on College Students: Study measures exposure timing and smoking temptation risk
- The History of the Communication Revolution and Digital Media: Timeline of ICT development from punch cards to the Internet
- Unethical Media Influences and Conclusion: False advertising examples and the case for media ethics
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Synthesizes multiple peer-reviewed sources across different publication years, showing how scholarly understanding of media influence on youth smoking has evolved over time.
- Applies a named theoretical model (Influence of Presumed Influence) to explain the mechanism by which media messages affect adolescent behavior, grounding the analysis in established academic frameworks.
- Supports claims with specific statistics from authoritative sources (CDC, HHS), strengthening the paper's credibility and precision.
- Includes a concrete empirical study (the Palm device study) to move beyond theory and demonstrate quantifiable media effects.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective source synthesis by placing multiple studies in dialogue with one another. Rather than summarizing each source in isolation, the author connects findings — for example, linking the IPI model to the Watson et al. focus-group results — to build a cumulative argument about how media shapes adolescent attitudes toward smoking.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad framing of media's societal role, then narrows to adolescent smoking as its primary case study, progressing through theoretical models, empirical findings, and historical context. It closes with a brief discussion of digital media history and unethical advertising, broadening the scope again before the conclusion. This funnel-and-widen structure effectively situates the central case study within a larger media landscape.
Media's Role in Shaping Society
It has long been established that the media exerts a strong influence on the public. When television and other media present powerful messages on any particular topic — smoking, for example — society is measurably affected. This paper draws on quality references to cover important aspects of the media: the issues it promotes, its history, its tactics, and its impacts.
Author Paul Boyer explains that through "mediated communicative processes" individuals help to shape society. Within those communicative processes are found "complex interactions of human agency, social institutions," along with the various media-driven communicative processes that form the foundations of society (Boyer, 2012). The media people use — including today's Internet, television, print media, and radio — shapes both "national political conversations" and numerous aspects of social relationships (Boyer, 2013).
Since the emergence of multiple cable channels and the 24-hour news cycle on CNN and other cable networks, a wide variety of socially relevant information — and what some would consider propaganda — has proliferated in the United States. Included in the socially relevant messages broadcast into homes are commercials and public service announcements aimed at changing, or at least influencing, certain behaviors related to public health.
Antismoking Campaigns and Adolescent Smoking Rates
When it comes to the issue of adolescent smoking, an article in the peer-reviewed Journal of Consumer Affairs notes that there have been decades of antismoking campaigns presented through the media. Even though the federal government (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — HHS) had hoped to reduce the percentage of adolescent smokers to 16% by 2010, the percentage remained at 20% that year (Paek, et al., 2011).
An updated statistic from the Office of Adolescent Health (HHS) shows that "nearly one in fifteen high school seniors" — just 7% — was a daily smoker in 2014 (HHS, 2015). That represents a substantial reduction from 2010. The HHS figure relates specifically to high school seniors rather than all adolescents; the statistic for all high school students, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was 9.2% in 2014. This is well down from the 2010 data, and the trend clearly indicates that antismoking messages delivered through various media are having a positive effect.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.