Medication Safety and NSQHS Standards in Nursing Practice
This paper examines a medication safety incident that occurred during a nursing simulation exercise involving a student nurse and a registered nurse. Using Australia's National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standard IV as a framework, the paper analyses the legal, ethical, delegation, teamwork, conflict management, and clinical leadership dimensions of the error. It discusses how the incident affected both the nursing team and the patient, reviews relevant literature on medication administration safety, and concludes with recommendations for clinical leadership training and clearer scope-of-practice policies for student nurses in hospital environments.
- Introduction: NSQHS standards and medication safety context
- The Incident: Simulation error involving student and registered nurse
- Impact on the Nursing Team and Patient: Consequences of the error for staff and patient
- Literature Review: Research on leadership, delegation, and error reporting
- Recommendations and Learning Experience: Policy changes and lessons drawn from the incident
- Conclusion: Summary of medication safety and scope-of-practice lessons
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the analysis in a concrete simulation scenario, making abstract principles such as delegation and clinical leadership tangible and easy to follow.
- Consistently ties the narrative back to the NSQHS Standard IV framework, giving the argument a clear regulatory anchor throughout.
- Balances multiple analytical dimensions — legal, ethical, delegation, teamwork, and leadership — without allowing any single one to dominate at the expense of others.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a case-based analytical structure: it presents a specific incident, examines its causes and consequences from several professional perspectives, and then moves to evidence-based recommendations. This approach — moving from the particular to the general — is characteristic of applied health-science writing and allows the student to show command of both practice knowledge and academic literature simultaneously.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a policy introduction establishing the NSQHS context, then narrates the simulation incident in detail. Two short analytical sections examine consequences for the nursing team and the patient separately. A literature review synthesises research on leadership, delegation, error reporting, and ethics. The paper closes with recommendations, a personal learning reflection, and a brief conclusion — a structure typical of undergraduate reflective health essays.
Introduction
The standards set by the National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) are designed to ensure that health service consumers receive the same quality of care in any healthcare facility across Australia (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care [ACSQHC], 2016). The primary objective of the NSQHS standards is to protect users of health services from harm and to enhance the quality of care provided nationwide. The standards function as mechanisms for monitoring the quality of health services (ACSQHC, 2019). However, despite the existence of these standards and several other safeguards, clinical and professional issues continue to arise in nursing, resulting in harm to health service consumers or a negative impact on the quality of care being offered (Government of Western Australia, 2017).
One of the key standards, Standard IV, establishes requirements to ensure medication safety (ACSQHC, 2019). It deals with drug prescription, administration, and monitoring. Part of the guidelines contained in this standard recommend explaining to patients the use and risks associated with certain medications before prescribing or administering them (Davies, Coombes, Keogh, & Whitfield, 2019). The objective of this essay is to outline an issue related to medication safety and to analyse its legal, ethical, delegation, teamwork, conflict management, and clinical leadership dimensions.
The Incident
In a simulation class, a student nurse and a registered nurse were providing care to a patient who was in severe pain and had asked for pain relief medication. When asked to rate her pain out of ten, the patient said it was eight. She also stated that her leg felt uncomfortable and tight in the cast that had been placed on it. However, the registered nurse was distracted while taking the patient's vital signs and failed to notice the patient's pain level. While the registered nurse measured the vital signs, the student nurse recorded them. Before the end of the measurement session, the student nurse brought the patient's pain to the registered nurse's attention, and together they decided to administer Tramadol for pain relief. While the student nurse was genuinely concerned about the patient's pain, the registered nurse was in a hurry to complete other tasks and rushed to administer the medication (Endacott et al., 2015).
In her rush, the registered nurse did not adequately follow the standards and rights for medication administration. The medication, being a Schedule IV substance, ought to have been checked, counted, and signed by two registered nurses in the treatment room prior to administration (Government of New South Wales, 2013; Government of Western Australia, 2013). This did not happen because the student nurse was not a registered nurse and was therefore outside her scope of practice, and the registered nurse failed to identify this deviation from standard procedure. The medication that was administered ended up being wasted, and the entire administration process had to be re-initiated when a second registered nurse arrived.
Several factors can compromise medication safety. In this particular case, the main factors were a lack of delegation and clinical leadership (Claffey, 2018). The case also raises ethical and legal questions about what occurred (Ben Natan, Sharon, Mahajna, & Mahajna, 2017). Inconsistency in medication administration can negatively affect both the patient and the nursing team (Davies et al., 2019).
Impact on the Nursing Team and Patient
Impact on the Nursing Team
A number of factors can compromise medication safety and negatively affect the nursing team. In this case, team members could be left with negative feelings such as doubt, guilt, and shame (Yung, Yu, Chu, Hou, & Tang, 2016). The nursing student was operating outside her normal scope of practice, and the registered nurse permitted this to occur in an attempt to support the student's learning (Bucknall et al., 2016). Embarrassment following such errors can lead the involved members of the nursing team to avoid admitting what went wrong (Yung et al., 2016). Those involved may also fear consequences such as loss of employment or suspension of their professional licence, leading to stress and diminished performance (Al-Ghareeb & Cooper, 2016). Because nurses are at the forefront of care provision and drug administration, a loss of confidence following an error can significantly impair their work (Jember, Hailu, Messele, Demeke, & Hassen, 2018). Nursing students must also understand their scope of practice and restrict their duties and actions accordingly (Reid-Searl, Happell, Burke, & Gaskin, 2013).
Impact on the Patient
The patient in this scenario had to wait longer than necessary for her medication while in severe discomfort. Her experience was unpleasant and could affect her satisfaction with the care she received (Claffey, 2018). Such an experience could also cause her — and those who learn of it — to distrust medical professionals and the health system (Claffey, 2018). This erosion of trust could further harm both the patient and care providers. Additionally, the scenario could have resulted in adverse events that increased the risk of harm or mortality for the patient (Jember et al., 2018).
Conclusion
The administration of medication is a complex process with registered nurses at the forefront of it. If done incorrectly, or if standards are not adhered to, errors can and do occur. These errors can lead to adverse events for patients and professional consequences for nursing staff. Nursing students require appropriate preceptorship and must handle only those duties that fall within the boundaries of their scope of practice. Regular evaluation of medication administration procedures and ongoing investigation of errors are essential strategies for reducing their future occurrence.
References
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care [ACSQHC]. (2019). Implementation of the national safety and quality health service standards. Retrieved from https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/nsqhs-standards/implementation-nsqhs-standards
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care [ACSQHC]. (2016). National safety and quality health service standards. Retrieved from https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/assessment-to-the-nsqhs-standards/nsqhs-standards-second-edition/
Ben Natan, M., Sharon, I., Mahajna, M., & Mahajna, S. (2017). Factors affecting nursing students' intention to report medication errors: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Nurse Education Today, 58(2), 38–42. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.017
Bogossian, F., Cooper, S., Kelly, M., Levett-Jones, T., McKenna, L., Slark, J., & Seaton, P. (2018). Best practice in clinical simulation education, are we there yet? A cross-sectional survey of simulation in Australian and New Zealand pre-registration nursing education. Collegian, 25(3), 327–334. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2017.09.003
Bucknall, T. K., Forbes, H., Phillips, N. M., Hewitt, N. A., Cooper, S., Bogossian, F., & FIRST2ACT Investigators. (2016). An analysis of nursing students' decision-making in teams during simulations of acute patient deterioration. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(10), 2482–2494.
Claffey, C. (2018). Near-miss medication errors provide a wake-up call. Nursing, 48(1), 53–55. doi:10.1097/01.NURSE.[redacted].45031.9e
Davies, K. M., Coombes, I. D., Keogh, S., & Whitfield, K. M. (2019). Medication administration evaluation tool design: An expert panel review. Collegian, 26(1), 118–124. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2018.05.001
Endacott, R., Bogossian, F. E., Cooper, S. J., Forbes, H., Kain, V. J., Young, S. C., . . . First2Act Team. (2015). Leadership and teamwork in medical emergencies: Performance of nursing students and registered nurses in simulated patient scenarios. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(1–2), 90–100.
Government of New South Wales. (2013). Medication handling in NSW public health facilities. Retrieved from
Government of Western Australia. (2013). Storage and recording of restricted schedule 4 (S4R) medicines. Retrieved from https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/About-us/Policy-frameworks
Government of Western Australia. (2017). Review of safety and quality in the WA health system: A strategy for continuous improvement. Retrieved from https://ww2.health.wa.gov.au/Reports-and-publications/Review-of-Safety-and-Quality-in-the-WA-health-system
Green, C. (2018). Contemporary issues: The pre-licensure nursing student and medication errors. Nurse Education Today, 68(3), 23–25. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.016
Hall, K. (2017). Simulation-based learning in Australian undergraduate mental health nursing curricula: A literature review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(8), 380–389.
Jarvelainen, M., Cooper, S., & Jones, J. (2018). Nursing students' educational experience in regional Australia: Reflections on acute events. A qualitative review of clinical incidents. Nurse Education in Practice, 31, 188–193.
Jember, A., Hailu, M., Messele, A., Demeke, T., & Hassen, M. (2018). Proportion of medication error reporting and associated factors among nurses: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing, 17(1), 9–11. doi:10.1186/s12912-018-0280-4
Kadivar, M., Manookian, A., Asghari, F., Niknafs, N., Okazi, A., & Zarvani, A. (2017). Ethical and legal aspects of patient's safety: A clinical case report. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 10(3), 15–17. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol22No02EthCol01
Latimer, S., Hewitt, J., Stanbrough, R., & McAndrew, R. (2017). Reducing medication errors: Teaching strategies that increase nursing students' awareness of medication errors and their prevention. Nurse Education Today, 52(7), 7–9. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.02.004
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia [NMBA]. (2016). Registered nurse standards for practice. Retrieved from http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards/registered-nurse-standards-for-practice.aspx
Reid-Searl, K., Happell, B., Burke, K. J., & Gaskin, C. J. (2013). Nursing students and the supervision of medication administration. Collegian, 20(2), 109–114. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2012.04.003
Roughead, E. E., Semple, S. J., & Rosenfeld, E. (2016). The extent of medication errors and adverse drug reactions throughout the patient journey in acute care in Australia. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 14(3), 113–122. doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000075
Saqer, T. J., & Abu Al Rub, R. F. (2018). Missed nursing care and its relationship with confidence in delegation among hospital nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(13–14), 2887–2895. doi:10.1111/jocn.14380
Vaismoradi, M., Griffiths, P., Turunen, H., & Jordan, S. (2016). Transformational leadership in nursing and medication safety education: A discussion paper. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(7), 970–980. doi:10.1111/jonm.12387
Vaismoradi, M., Jordan, S., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2014). Nursing students' perspectives of the cause of medication errors. Nurse Education Today, 34(3), 434–440. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.015
Al-Ghareeb, A. Z., & Cooper, S. J. (2016). Barriers and enablers to the use of high-fidelity patient simulation manikins in nurse education: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 36, 281–286.
Yoon, J., Kim, M., & Shin, J. (2016). Confidence in delegation and leadership of registered nurses in long-term-care hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(5), 676–685. doi:10.1111/jonm.12372
Yung, H.-P., Yu, S., Chu, C., Hou, I. C., & Tang, F.-I. (2016). Nurses' attitudes and perceived barriers to the reporting of medication administration errors. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(5), 580–588. doi:10.1111/jonm.12360
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.