Mental Health Care Coordination for African Americans
This paper presents a mental health care coordination plan designed to address the persistent disparities African Americans face within the U.S. healthcare system. Drawing on the wraparound model of care, the plan outlines three patient-centered interventions—culturally competent care, peer support, and community-based services—alongside relevant community resources such as faith-based organizations and local support groups. The paper also examines ethical considerations including informed consent and the principle of beneficence, discusses health policy implications such as fragmented care systems and provider diversity gaps, and aligns its goals with the Healthy People 2030 initiative to reduce opioid use disorder. Together, these elements form a holistic framework for improving mental health outcomes in the African American community.
- Introduction: Establishes mental health disparities and care coordination goals
- Patient-Centered Health Interventions and Timelines: Three interventions: cultural competence, peer support, community care
- Community Resources: Faith-based, online, and local mental health support options
- Ethics and Care Coordination: Beneficence, informed consent, and cultural care dilemmas
- Health Policy Implications: Fragmented systems, provider diversity, and funding recommendations
- Conclusion: Steps to close African American mental health disparities
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper connects multiple interrelated health issues—mental illness, opioid misuse, and chronic conditions—into a single, coherent care coordination framework rather than treating each in isolation.
- It grounds recommendations in specific, named community resources and national initiatives (e.g., the National Black Mental Health Alliance, the wraparound model), giving the plan practical credibility.
- The ethics section demonstrates disciplined self-reflection, raising genuine clinical dilemmas such as culturally specific therapy and the risk of unintended harm, which elevates the paper beyond a simple policy summary.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses the ethical principle of beneficence as an organizing lens for evaluating all proposed interventions. By consistently returning to patient welfare, informed consent, and cultural sensitivity, the author shows how an ethical framework can structure practical healthcare decision-making—a technique common in nursing and social work literature.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a logical policy-report structure: an introduction establishing the problem and model, a section detailing three specific interventions with measurement strategies, a community resources survey, an ethics discussion covering both principles and personal reflection, a health policy implications section, and a synthesizing conclusion. Each section builds on the previous one, moving from rationale to intervention to oversight to policy.
Introduction
African Americans have long been underserved by the mental health care system in the United States. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the need for improved care coordination for this population, with a focus on addressing psychosocial needs. One model of care coordination that has shown promise is the wraparound model. This model takes a holistic approach to care, focusing on the individual's strengths and needs. It also emphasizes the importance of family and community support in the recovery process. The wraparound model has been successfully used with other populations, and there is reason to believe it could be equally effective with African Americans. With its focus on strengths-based care and community support, the wraparound model has the potential to make a real difference in the lives of African Americans living with mental illness (Winters & Metz, 2009).
Improving access to mental health care is the central focus of this care coordination plan, particularly for the African American community. It also addresses the Healthy People 2030 challenge to "reduce the proportion of people who had opioid use disorder in the past year" (Healthy People 2030, 2021). Because a lack of mental health support can lead individuals to abuse substances such as opioids, these two problems are closely linked within the African American community. The third health care issue addressed in this plan is the presence of chronic health conditions that can impact mental health. The plan aims to ensure that African Americans receive culturally competent health care services that support them in managing those conditions (Moadel et al., 2007).
Patient-Centered Health Interventions and Timelines
Mental health is a growing concern in the African American community. According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness, one in five adults in the United States will experience mental illness in a given year, and African Americans are 20% more likely to experience serious mental health problems than the general population. While there is no single solution for addressing this complex issue, three patient-centered health interventions have been shown to be effective in improving mental health outcomes in African American communities.
The first intervention is culturally competent care. This type of care takes into account the unique cultural and social needs of African Americans and seeks to provide care that is respectful and responsive to those needs. A recent study found that African Americans who receive culturally competent care are more likely to adhere to treatment plans and experience fewer hospitalizations (Moadel et al., 2007).
The second intervention is peer support. This involves connecting patients with others who have similar experiences and can provide emotional support and practical advice. One program that has been shown to be effective is called "Friends for Life," which pairs African American cancer patients with trained peer mentors. This approach can also help reduce opioid abuse by addressing the underlying emotional and social needs that contribute to substance use.
The third intervention is community-based care. This type of care takes place outside of traditional medical settings and seeks to address the social determinants of health that impact mental well-being. One promising approach is wraparound services, which provide comprehensive support to families dealing with mental illness (Walker & Sanders, 2011). These services can help ensure that access to mental health care is sufficient across the community.
While these interventions each have their own timeline for implementation, they share a common goal: to improve mental health outcomes in African American communities. By working together, nurses and health care leaders can ensure that these interventions make a lasting difference. Rather than imposing a rigid timeline, outcomes should be measured using surveys, interviews, and focus groups to establish a baseline satisfaction level and to assess post-intervention satisfaction among stakeholders.
Community Resources
A number of initiatives have been launched to improve mental health outcomes in the African American community, including the National Black Mental Health Alliance, the Black Emotional and Mental Health Collective, and the #MentalHealthMatters campaign. Other available community resources for a safe and effective continuum of care include primarily faith-based services (Avent & Cashwell, 2015).
Available community resources for African Americans regarding mental health tend to include local support groups, faith-based organizations, and online communities (Avent & Cashwell, 2015). Local support groups can provide a safe space for African Americans to share their experiences and find support from others who understand what they are going through. Faith-based organizations can also serve as a source of support, offering both practical and spiritual guidance. Online communities can provide an anonymous forum for discussion and support. With the help of these resources, African Americans can receive the care and support they need to maintain their mental health.
Conclusion
When it comes to mental health, African Americans have long been underserved by the healthcare system. Only about one-third of African Americans with mental illness receive treatment, compared to approximately half of all Americans with mental illness. There are a number of reasons for this disparity, including lack of access to quality care, stigma, and mistrust of the medical establishment. However, meaningful steps can be taken to improve mental health outcomes in the African American community. One key intervention is to design patient-centered health care programs that account for the unique needs of this population. Another critical step is to increase funding for mental health services in minority-serving organizations. By taking these measures, it is possible to begin closing the mental health disparity between African Americans and other Americans.
References
ACA. (2014). Code of ethics. Retrieved from
Avent, J. R., & Cashwell, C. S. (2015). The Black church: Theology and implications for counseling African Americans. The Professional Counselor, 5(1), 81.
Healthy People 2030. (2021). Opioid use. Retrieved from https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/drug-and-alcohol-use/reduce-proportion-people-who-had-opioid-use-disorder-past-year-su-18
Moadel, A. B., Morgan, C., & Dutcher, J. (2007). Psychosocial needs assessment among an underserved, ethnically diverse cancer patient population. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, 109(S2), 446–454.
Walker, J. S., & Sanders, B. (2011). The community supports for wraparound inventory: An assessment of the implementation context for wraparound. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 747–757.
Winters, N. C., & Metz, W. P. (2009). The wraparound approach in systems of care. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 32(1), 135–151.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.