Mental Health Care Coordination for African Americans
This paper presents a mental health care coordination plan designed to address the persistent disparities African Americans face within the U.S. healthcare system. Drawing on the wraparound model of care, the plan outlines three patient-centered interventions—culturally competent care, peer support, and community-based services—alongside relevant community resources such as faith-based organizations and local support groups. The paper also examines ethical considerations including informed consent and the principle of beneficence, discusses health policy implications such as fragmented care systems and provider diversity gaps, and aligns its goals with the Healthy People 2030 initiative to reduce opioid use disorder. Together, these elements form a holistic framework for improving mental health outcomes in the African American community.
- Introduction: Establishes mental health disparities and care coordination goals
- Patient-Centered Health Interventions and Timelines: Three interventions: cultural competence, peer support, community care
- Community Resources: Faith-based, online, and local mental health support options
- Ethics and Care Coordination: Beneficence, informed consent, and cultural care dilemmas
- Health Policy Implications: Fragmented systems, provider diversity, and funding recommendations
- Conclusion: Steps to close African American mental health disparities
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper connects multiple interrelated health issues—mental illness, opioid misuse, and chronic conditions—into a single, coherent care coordination framework rather than treating each in isolation.
- It grounds recommendations in specific, named community resources and national initiatives (e.g., the National Black Mental Health Alliance, the wraparound model), giving the plan practical credibility.
- The ethics section demonstrates disciplined self-reflection, raising genuine clinical dilemmas such as culturally specific therapy and the risk of unintended harm, which elevates the paper beyond a simple policy summary.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses the ethical principle of beneficence as an organizing lens for evaluating all proposed interventions. By consistently returning to patient welfare, informed consent, and cultural sensitivity, the author shows how an ethical framework can structure practical healthcare decision-making—a technique common in nursing and social work literature.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a logical policy-report structure: an introduction establishing the problem and model, a section detailing three specific interventions with measurement strategies, a community resources survey, an ethics discussion covering both principles and personal reflection, a health policy implications section, and a synthesizing conclusion. Each section builds on the previous one, moving from rationale to intervention to oversight to policy.
Introduction
African Americans have long been underserved by the mental health care system in the United States. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the need for improved care coordination for this population, with a focus on addressing psychosocial needs. One model of care coordination that has shown promise is the wraparound model. This model takes a holistic approach to care, focusing on the individual's strengths and needs. It also emphasizes the importance of family and community support in the recovery process. The wraparound model has been successfully used with other populations, and there is reason to believe it could be equally effective with African Americans. With its focus on strengths-based care and community support, the wraparound model has the potential to make a real difference in the lives of African Americans living with mental illness (Winters & Metz, 2009).
Improving access to mental health care is the central focus of this care coordination plan, particularly for the African American community. It also addresses the Healthy People 2030 challenge to "reduce the proportion of people who had opioid use disorder in the past year" (Healthy People 2030, 2021). Because a lack of mental health support can lead individuals to abuse substances such as opioids, these two problems are closely linked within the African American community. The third health care issue addressed in this plan is the presence of chronic health conditions that can impact mental health. The plan aims to ensure that African Americans receive culturally competent health care services that support them in managing those conditions (Moadel et al., 2007).
References
ACA. (2014). Code of ethics. Retrieved from
Avent, J. R., & Cashwell, C. S. (2015). The Black church: Theology and implications for counseling African Americans. The Professional Counselor, 5(1), 81.
Healthy People 2030. (2021). Opioid use. Retrieved from https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/drug-and-alcohol-use/reduce-proportion-people-who-had-opioid-use-disorder-past-year-su-18
Moadel, A. B., Morgan, C., & Dutcher, J. (2007). Psychosocial needs assessment among an underserved, ethnically diverse cancer patient population. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, 109(S2), 446–454.
Walker, J. S., & Sanders, B. (2011). The community supports for wraparound inventory: An assessment of the implementation context for wraparound. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 747–757.
Winters, N. C., & Metz, W. P. (2009). The wraparound approach in systems of care. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 32(1), 135–151.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.