Nigeria's 2015 Election Postponement: Security vs. Democracy
This paper examines Nigeria's decision to postpone its national election from February 14 to March 28, 2015, in response to security threats posed by Boko Haram. It analyzes the competing perspectives of government officials, opposition leaders, and international observers regarding whether postponement serves security interests or weakens democratic institutions. The paper evaluates claims by President Goodluck Jonathan's administration, National Security Adviser Sambo Dasuki's military confidence and regional cooperation strategy, opposition leader Muhammadu Buhari's skepticism, and on-the-ground concerns from affected citizens. Central questions include whether postponement represents a justified precaution or a dangerous step backward for Nigerian democracy.
- Election Postponement and Security Concerns: Election delayed due to Boko Haram threat
- Government Rationale and Official Position: Official justifications from Jonathan administration
- Opposition Critique and Skepticism: Buhari challenges government security claims
- Regional Military Cooperation Strategy: Multinational military deployment plans
- Civilian Perspective and Democratic Tension: Lived experience and democratic stakes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Presents multiple stakeholder perspectives—government, opposition, international observers, and civilians—without oversimplifying a complex political crisis.
- Grounds abstract political claims in concrete facts: specific dates, military troop numbers (8,700), regional deployments, and historical precedents (Buhari's 1983 coup).
- Identifies a genuine structural tension: the constitutional role of police (not military) in election security versus the military's operational commitment to counter-insurgency, creating a practical paradox.
- Uses direct quotations strategically to capture differing confidence levels and reveal underlying political stakes without editorial commentary.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs a stakeholder-analysis framework common in policy and international affairs writing. Rather than advocating a single position, it systematizes competing claims about the same event, allowing readers to evaluate the credibility and consistency of each actor's statements. This approach is especially effective when analyzing crisis response, where official rationales may diverge from structural realities or political incentives. The paper demonstrates the technique by cross-referencing Dasuki's military confidence against Buhari's skepticism about military capability in a six-week timeframe, illustrating how the same data (military capacity, security footprint) produces radically different conclusions.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with the factual trigger (postponement and initial security rationale), then expands outward: first to the political context (Jonathan vs. Buhari as candidates), then to official explanations (Ambassador Adefuye, INEC Chairman Jega, Dasuki), then to opposition counterarguments (Buhari's public statements), then to the proposed solution (regional military cooperation), and finally to the human ground truth (a Cameroonian taxi driver's perspective). This structure moves from decision to justification to doubt to attempted remedy to lived reality, mirroring how policy crises unfold in real time.
Election Postponement and Security Concerns
Nigeria's elections committee postponed the national election from February 14 to March 28, 2015, citing growing concerns about violence and security. The postponement decision emerged amid heightened threats from Boko Haram, the extremist militant group operating primarily in the country's northeastern region. Nigeria's security chiefs expressed doubt about their ability to protect voters in the northeast from Boko Haram attacks. These concerns were not abstract: hundreds of schoolgirls had been abducted in the northeast during the previous year, and Boko Haram fighters had launched attacks on villages in neighboring Chad as recently as February.
However, postponement itself became controversial. Some observers and officials questioned whether a delay would actually improve security conditions or instead create further instability. The decision opened deeper questions about the relationship between electoral timing and national security, and whether postponement represented a responsible precaution or a dangerous step away from democratic governance. Boko Haram's escalating violence made the stakes of this debate extraordinarily high, as the group had transitioned from sporadic attacks to coordinated military operations that threatened the state's control over its own territory.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.