This paper examines the psychological forces driving Norman Bates, the iconic antagonist of Alfred Hitchcock's 1960 film Psycho, through two theoretical lenses: Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory and the behaviorist concept of dissociation. The analysis argues that Bates exhibits an extreme, unresolved Oedipus complex rooted in an unhealthy maternal attachment and the absence of a paternal figure, which prevents him from developing mature sexuality. Additionally, the paper applies the behaviorist model of dissociation to explain how years of psychological abuse led Bates to adopt his mother's personality as a coping mechanism, ultimately resulting in a complete fracture of his identity and a series of murders.
The paper demonstrates effective application of theoretical frameworks to a fictional text. Rather than simply summarizing the film's plot, the writer uses Freud's Oedipus complex and the behaviorist model of dissociation as analytical lenses, showing how established psychological theory can explain character behavior. This technique — selecting a theory, defining it briefly, and then mapping it onto specific textual evidence — is a foundational skill in both psychology and film studies essays.
The paper follows a clear five-part structure: an engaging introduction presenting the thesis, a brief plot summary providing context, a section developing the Freudian argument with cited support, a section applying behaviorist dissociation theory, and a short conclusion. Each body section opens by naming its theoretical framework before applying it, which keeps the argument organized and signposted throughout.
"She just goes a little mad sometimes. We all go a little mad sometimes. Haven't you?" (Hitchcock 1960). The character of Norman Bates is probably one of the most memorable in all of horror movie history. His disturbing behavior haunted audiences for generations. What psychological forces would have driven a character so mad as to dress as his dead mother and murder again and again?
There are two primary theories that prove helpful in exploring Norman Bates' psychosis: Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory and the behaviorist notion of dissociation. It is clear that Bates exhibits an extreme attachment to his mother, explained by Freud's Oedipus complex, as well as a severe case of dissociation that fractures his personality into two completely separate entities.
Norman Bates frightened audiences across the world in Alfred Hitchcock's 1960 release of the film Psycho. In the film, Bates is a lonely hotel owner who seems innocent until a chance encounter with a beautiful thief fleeing her job in Los Angeles with $40,000 of her boss' money. Completely unaware of the large amount of cash she carries, Bates murders her in the infamous shower scene while dressed as his mother.
Hitchcock carefully portrays the murder as if it were truly committed by his mother — a fact the audience is led to believe until the mother's shriveled body is found on the estate and Bates' horrifying mental illness is fully revealed at the end of the film. What goes wrong in Bates' mind? What happened to that seemingly lovable, lonely young man who appeared to want nothing more than some extra attention at the beginning of the film? The character development of Norman Bates is anything but normal; he is morphed into a helpless boy who becomes his mother in order to cope with the world around him and his own internal desires.
The first theory that helps illuminate the development of Norman Bates' character is Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory. According to Freud, all of us carry within us what he called the Oedipus complex. This concept is based on Sophocles' great tale of a Greek king who unknowingly murders his father and marries his mother. According to Freud's thinking, this complex explains the natural affinity children have toward the parent of the opposite sex and their innate initial antagonism toward the parent of the same sex.
As the infant is limited in terms of social understanding, he or she exhibits the Oedipus complex when the first sexual feelings toward the opposite sex lead to a sense of competition for the attention of that parent with the parent of the same sex. This competition fuels affinity for the opposite-sex parent and tension with the same-sex parent. According to Freud, "the Oedipus complex was acquired at the killing of the father by the brothers banded together" (Freud 1989:93). The boy loves the mother and despises the father, for the mother is the first sexual attraction and the father is the direct competition for that relationship.
It is clear that Norman Bates is in the grip of an extreme case of the Oedipus complex. Unknowingly, he plays out his jealousy by embracing the role of his mother whenever she is challenged by another sexual attraction: "Norman Bates is a grown man stuck in the Oedipus complex, and in the film we see Norman driven to an act of murder through the jealousy he perceives his mother to experience when he is sexually aroused by another woman" (LeDrew 2009:1). Until the arrival of the young blonde thief, Norman was completely cut off from the rest of society. This left his relationship with his mother unchallenged and his psychosis relatively untriggered. However, when another female figure appears, it sets off a reaction within him that is typical in kind but far more dangerous in degree.
Rather than allowing his sexual attraction to another woman to override the innate attachment he holds for his mother — as most men his age would — Norman is consumed by guilt. He becomes "his mother whenever he experiences sexual desire for other women, illustrating his inability to resolve the Oedipus complex and achieve a mature sexuality" (LeDrew 2009:1). Thus, he takes on the role of the jealous mother and acts according to that jealousy.
This dynamic is further exacerbated by the damage his mother inflicted on his psyche while she was alive. She completely debilitated him as a mature male adult, constantly belittling him. This destroyed any prospect of his coping with the real world, for he had no confidence in himself. His mother's rage went unchecked because there was no father figure in the picture. Norman's real father had left long before the events of the film, and so he was raised with no male influence to counteract the destructive effects of his mother's constant nagging and put-downs.
As a result, "the absence or failure of a paternal order to ensure resolution of the Oedipus complex, serving as a reminder of the Oedipus complex that we all have experienced, and the repression of the desire for the mother that was necessary to resolve the complex" (LeDrew 2009:1). Without a father figure to neutralize the jealous female influence, Norman has no way to suppress those feelings of jealousy that his mother would have felt had she been alive. A strong male presence would have naturally checked that jealousy and provided Norman with the conditions for a healthier development — one that might have led to a very different, far less violent life. Instead, with no male figurehead to guide him beyond the Oedipus stage, Norman is entirely defenseless against the psychosis his mother instilled in him long before her death.
His story is one of the most compelling and frightening tales of twentieth-century film. Alfred Hitchcock is a master of suspense, and with the character of Norman Bates he depicts the terrifying development of an abused boy isolated from reality in a gripping and unforgettable plot. His crimes and psychosis will forever occupy a singular place in the history of cinema.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.