Nursing Leadership and Evidence-Based Practice Priorities
This paper examines the core priorities and challenges facing nursing leadership with respect to evidence-based practice (EBP). It argues that while nurses are fundamentally tasked with delivering effective patient care, achieving that goal requires a systematic, top-down framework for identifying and implementing evidence-based measures. The paper identifies gaps between organizational mission statements and actual nursing practices, applies systems theory to underscore the complexity of care integration, and conducts a SWOT analysis of a representative healthcare organization. It concludes by proposing the creation of an Evidence-Based Practice Manager position, examining how leadership power and organizational structure can drive coherent, facility-wide adoption of proven clinical practices.
- Nursing Leadership Priorities and Challenges: Core nursing priorities and systematic EBP challenges
- Gaps Between Organizational Statements and Practices: Disconnect between mission statements and actual nursing practice
- SWOT Analysis: Organizational strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
- The Effect of Power and Leadership Structure: How leadership power drives organization-wide EBP adoption
- References: Cited sources supporting the paper's arguments
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly connects the abstract priority of evidence-based practice to concrete organizational mechanisms, such as the proposed Evidence-Based Practice Manager role.
- Uses a SWOT framework effectively to ground theoretical concerns in a realistic organizational assessment, giving the argument practical credibility.
- Draws on systems theory to explain why piecemeal EBP adoption fails, adding intellectual depth to what could otherwise be a straightforward policy argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied analytical writing by moving from problem identification (inconsistent EBP adoption) through diagnostic frameworks (systems theory, SWOT) to a concrete structural solution (a dedicated managerial role). This progression — problem, analysis, solution — is a hallmark of effective professional and academic writing in health administration contexts.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing nursing's core priority and the challenge of achieving it systematically. The second section identifies the gap between organizational statements and real-world nursing practice. The third section applies a SWOT analysis to a specific healthcare organization. The fourth section examines how positional power and leadership structure can drive organization-wide EBP adoption. A references section closes the paper. This four-part structure moves logically from theory to diagnosis to solution.
Nursing Leadership Priorities and Challenges
The priorities for nursing and nursing leadership are, on some levels, fundamentally simple. Nurses are tasked with providing the most effective care for their patient populations. This goal becomes much more nuanced when one begins thinking about how to properly achieve it. There is a considerable amount of research emerging in recent years surrounding this field which supports the notion that evidence-based practice is one of the most efficient ways to improve patient outcomes (Stevens, 2013). Therefore, in alignment with the chief priority of providing the best possible care to patients, nurses must also prioritize how to do so by utilizing evidence-based measures with a demonstrated efficacy in both clinical and outpatient settings.
However, pursuing these two priorities creates an inherent challenge for nursing on multiple levels, including those pertaining to organizations, roles, and individuals. Specifically, the difficulty lies in introducing new evidence-based measures into the profession in a comprehensive manner that establishes precedents and warrants conformity at each of those levels. Without a systematic way of fulfilling this goal, nurses are liable to conduct their own independent research and implement evidence-based measures autonomously in ways that may not conform to organizational protocol. Worse, they might eschew evidence-based measures altogether (Mulhall, 1998), resulting in a situation in which different nurses utilize various measures to provide care in a disjointed, or possibly even dysfunctional, way.
Instead, what is needed is a top-down approach in which there are organized means of discerning relevant evidence-based practices and facilitating them in a similarly structured manner. Doing so would improve nursing and patient objectives while utilizing the most proven methods to accomplish those outcomes.
Gaps Between Organizational Statements and Practices
The disparate implementation of evidence-based nursing practice across healthcare facilities creates inherent gaps between organizational statements and actual practices. Most healthcare organizations have mission statements regarding how they intend to facilitate the best possible treatment for patients. Nurses are often the focal point of those treatment efforts, particularly since they are regularly called upon to administer care and work closely with patients to achieve desired outcomes. Without a holistic, systematic approach to determining which evidence-based practices are incorporated into healthcare facilities — and how — there are pronounced points of departure between articulating patient goals and providing a consistent means of achieving them.
A basic understanding of systems theory and systems thinking underscores this point. Nurses must integrate a number of different systems to effect proper care, including environmental factors (Neuman, 1996), individual patient-centered considerations, and sanitary and psychological concerns. The complexity of such integration is amplified when one considers the different nursing fields in which practitioners must apply these systems. Thus, it is necessary to have a structured approach to incorporating evidence-based practice that is applicable to all of these systems and to the way they relate to the mission statements of specific organizations. Without such an orderly approach to identifying and implementing evidence-based practices, nurses and their organizations are largely unaware of which approaches produce the greatest benefit for patients. As a result, they will not be able to successfully meet organizational objectives for treating patients as effectively as they could with some systemic method for utilizing evidence-based practices.
SWOT Analysis
Strengths — The primary strength of this organization is its access to new information in the field of nursing. This is facilitated by partnerships with numerous service, therapeutics, and equipment providers within the healthcare space. This strength is further supported by a capable IT systems team with access to medical publications, journals, and sophisticated analytics mechanisms — including text analytics — to parse through such data and reach conclusions that would otherwise require lengthy time periods.
Weaknesses — The chief weakness plaguing this organization is a marked lack of current evidence-based practices. Those in use were established years ago. The organization needs to improve treatment by capitalizing on more recent, evidence-based advances across all of the areas in which it employs nurses. As a result, nurses are currently attempting to use evidence-based practices in a haphazard manner.
Opportunities — The combination of personnel expertise and IT proficiency presents a prime opportunity for this organization to create a new position: Evidence-Based Practice Manager. This manager can synthesize findings from various journal articles and industry trends to establish, in a uniform way, the proper procedures and protocols for implementing evidence-based practices within the organization. This could be a full-time position that allows the organization to capitalize on its strengths and partially overcome its weaknesses, producing a significant positive impact on patient outcomes.
Threats — The primary threat to this organization is its failure to help patients meet goals as quickly and effectively as competing organizations that incorporate evidence-based practice in a more timely manner. Additionally, the organization could potentially face legal liability from patients who are unable to meet their goals due to the lack of inclusion of evidence-based measures.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.