Comparing Nursing Theorists: Orem, Peplau, Levine, and Watson
This paper examines and compares four influential nursing theorists—Dorothea Orem, Hildegard Peplau, Myra Levine, and Jean Watson—against the foundational philosophy of Florence Nightingale, widely recognized as the philosophical founder of modern secular nursing. The paper opens with a comparative table summarizing each theorist's educational background, philosophy of nursing, definition of nursing, and theoretical goals. It then analyzes each theory in turn, noting limitations and strengths relative to Nightingale's environmental theory. The paper concludes that Levine's Conservation Model, with its holistic, environment-centered focus on adaptation and integrity, is the most congruent with Nightingale's original philosophy.
- Comparative Overview of Four Nursing Theorists: Side-by-side table of four theorists' backgrounds and philosophies
- Introduction: Nightingale as the Philosophical Foundation: Nightingale established as the evaluative benchmark
- Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory: Orem's three-part theory analyzed and critiqued
- Hildegard Peplau's Theory of Interpersonal Relations: Peplau's interpersonal phases compared with Nightingale
- Jean Watson's Theory of Human Caring: Watson's caring theory critiqued for abstraction
- Myra Levine's Conservation Model and Its Alignment with Nightingale: Levine identified as most congruent with Nightingale
- Conclusion: Levine's model selected as best fit for Nightingale's philosophy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The comparative table at the opening efficiently organizes four theorists across consistent categories, giving readers an immediate framework before the analytical prose begins.
- The paper establishes a clear evaluative criterion—congruence with Nightingale's environmental philosophy—and applies it consistently to each theory, producing a focused comparative argument rather than a disconnected survey.
- Specific limitations of each theory (Orem's fragmentation into three sub-theories, Watson's reliance on abstraction) are named and explained, which strengthens the eventual selection of Levine as the best fit.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates criterion-based comparative analysis: rather than evaluating theories in isolation, it anchors all judgments to a single external standard (Nightingale's philosophy). This technique forces the writer to articulate why each theory succeeds or falls short on the same dimension, resulting in a conclusion that follows logically from the body rather than appearing arbitrary.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a structured comparison table, then transitions to a contextualizing introduction that establishes Nightingale as the benchmark. Four body sections follow, each devoted to one theorist and organized around the same evaluative question. The sections move from weakest alignment (Orem, Peplau, Watson) to strongest (Levine), building toward the conclusion. The final paragraph summarizes the comparative finding and restates the thesis.
Comparative Overview of Four Nursing Theorists
The table below summarizes the educational background, philosophy of nursing, definition of nursing, and theoretical goal of each of the four nursing theorists examined in this paper.
| Dorothea Orem | Hildegard Peplau | Myra Levine | Jean Watson | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Educational Background | Nursing diploma, Providence Hospital School of Nursing. Bachelor of Science, 1939; Master of Science in Nursing Education, 1945. | Graduated Pottstown, Pennsylvania Hospital School of Nursing, 1931. B.A. in interpersonal psychology, Bennington College, Vermont, 1943; M.A. in psychiatric nursing, Teachers College, Columbia, 1947; Ed.D. in curriculum development, Columbia University, 1953. | Diploma in Nursing, Cook County School of Nursing, 1944. Bachelor of Science in Nursing, 1949; Master of Science in Nursing, 1962. | B.S. in Nursing, 1964; M.S. in psychiatric and mental health nursing, 1966; Ph.D. in educational psychology and counseling, 1973. |
| Philosophy of Nursing | Humans participate in ongoing interchange and communication between themselves and their environments to function and stay alive. | Peplau considered nursing as therapeutic, meant to help a sick individual in need of health care. | Holistic perspective, believing environment plays a key role in "wholeness." | Caring represents the core of nursing and implies responsiveness between patient and nurse; the nurse co-participates toward the recovery of the person. |
| Definition of Nursing | Orem defined nursing as an art through which the nurse offers specialized assistance to persons with disabilities, making ordinary assistance essential for meeting the needs of self-care. | Nursing, under Peplau's perspective, is an interpersonal process that encompasses interaction among two or more persons sharing a common aim. | Nursing should promote "wholeness" and entails engagement in human interactions. | Caring, along with nursing, has existed throughout the ages in every society. Caring for others is natural; however, a caring attitude does not come from genes — it is transmitted via the culture of the profession. |
| Goal/Purpose of Theory | Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory: To encourage patients to be as independent as possible and promote self-care. | Theory of Interpersonal Relations: Through interactions, the nurse develops a care model suited to the needs of individuals, aiming for a common goal of health. | The Conservation Model: Nursing's role in conservation is to assist an individual with the process of "keeping together" the total individual through the minimum amount of effort. | Theory of Human Caring: Nursing concerns the promotion of health, the prevention of disease, caring for the sick, and restoration of health. The goal is health promotion and the treatment of disease through caring. |
Introduction: Nightingale as the Philosophical Foundation
Nursing often involves care and empathy toward the patient and the process. Theoretical pioneers like Dorothea Orem, Hildegard Peplau, Myra Levine, and Jean Watson have provided nurses with the ability to understand the needs of patients through insightful critical thinking and varied perspectives. Although their contributions have been momentous and inspiring, the first nursing theorist to truly change how nurses interact with patients was Florence Nightingale. Recognized as the philosophical founder of modern secular nursing, she was the first to focus on the collective and individual needs of nursing and apply her knowledge through theory. Her philosophy of nursing meant integration and balance of concerns ranging from human and non-human to inner and outer. By examining the four nursing theorists and comparing their philosophies with Nightingale's, this paper selects the theorist whose work is most congruent with Nightingale's foundational vision.
Dorothea Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory
Dorothea Orem created the Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory. The theory emphasizes the duty of the nurse to encourage independence in the patient so that the patient can develop a level of self-care that will contribute to a positive health outcome. Although the original theory was eventually divided into three related theories, the overall message is to enable independence in patients. Self-care is at the center of the theory and is defined as follows:
"Self-care is not limited to a person providing care for himself; it includes care offered by others on behalf of the person (dependent care). Care may be offered by members of the family or outsiders until a person is able to perform self-care. Self-care is purposeful and contributes to human structural integrity, functioning, and development" (Meleis, 2012, p. 280).
When compared to the other theories, including Nightingale's, Orem's theory is vastly different in that it places some of the responsibility for a positive health outcome on the patient. Furthermore, by splitting the original theory into three, it adds complexity to the framework, making it more difficult to understand the original or updated goal.
The first sub-theory, the theory of self-care, focuses on self-care as a means of maintaining life, keeping psychic and physical functions continuing, and maintaining a person's health integrity to sustain good health. This theory echoes Orem's original concept but does not elaborate on how to enable self-care within the patient.
The second sub-theory, self-care deficit, provides the most comprehensive element but fails to deliver a clear and concise understanding of the theory. It has a central idea expressed through two sets of presuppositions. The first involves the individual's capability to engage in and manage self-care and dependent care, as well as to take actions to manage and maintain functioning and health. The second encompasses an understanding of what society can offer to help an individual in a state of dependency become more independent (Meleis, 2012). These extra layers seem to detract from the overall meaning of the theory.
The third sub-theory is the theory of nursing systems. Its framework involves the understanding that experienced nurses offer intentional care for patients requiring dependent care. Such fragmentation creates unnecessary confusion and stands in sharp contrast to the simplicity offered in Nightingale's philosophy of nursing.
Conclusion
Nursing involves a variety of complex processes and the application of critical thinking. Nurse theorists offer nursing students a chance to understand what is needed to provide high-quality care to patients. Often this involves a holistic approach that allows for the cultivation of interpersonal communication and an understanding of certain factors, such as the environment. Of the four theorists examined, Levine's Conservation Model best aligns with Nightingale's environmental theory because it encompasses conservation of integrity across multiple dimensions of the patient's experience.
References
Claywell, L. (2013). LPN to RN transitions. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Fawcett, J., & Desanto-Madeya, S. (2013). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories. F.A. Davis.
Meleis, A. I. (2012). Theoretical nursing: Development and progress. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Watson, J. (2008). Nursing: The philosophy and science of caring. University Press of Colorado.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.