This essay examines the often-overlooked role of parental educational background in student achievement within high-need schools. While equal facilities and curriculum quality are important, the author argues that the generational impact of educational disparity—wherein parents lack the educational foundation to support their children's learning—represents a critical barrier to closing achievement gaps. Drawing on personal experience, the paper demonstrates how parental education and financial resources enable learning support at home, and contrasts this with typical conditions in low-socioeconomic households. The essay concludes with a teacher's perspective on individual and systemic responsibilities to address these cumulative educational deficits.
The major issue that people consistently fail to adequately address when discussing raising achievement in high-need schools is the generational impact of educational disparity. For many people, providing equal educational facilities and equal quality of education is the only remedy for solving educational inequality. However, this perspective ignores the critical role that parents play in their child's education. This role extends far beyond school-based involvement such as parent-teacher organizations. While those parents may help contribute to the overall quality of a school, they do not necessarily impact individual student education in the necessary manner. Instead, what matters most is the critical role that parents play in their children's learning readiness and educational support—an ancillary yet fundamental influence that often goes unexamined.
Consider the difference in educational environments created by parental background. I grew up with a father who had a graduate-school level professional education and a mother who lacked any education beyond the first year of college, but who had attended a highly recognized private school during her high school years. When I had questions about homework, it was no problem for either of them to assist me. When I encountered math issues that they were unable to address in high school, they had the financial resources to hire a tutor and enough working knowledge to assess whether that tutor was an expert.
This situation is not generally seen in the homes of students in high-need schools. Instead, those parents frequently lack the educational background to provide learning assistance to their children and lack the financial resources to pay for that assistance when something is beyond their skill set. This disparity in home learning support creates an invisible but powerful advantage for students whose parents can provide both intellectual guidance and financial investment in their education.
It is critical to understand that it is not a lack of parental involvement or desire to help their children that may prevent these parents from doing so—an assumption that many make when dismissing lower-socioeconomic class members as somehow less deserving than people in higher socioeconomic groups. The question is not will they help, but rather can they help? How can a parent who reads at an elementary school level give guidance or feedback to a child writing a paper on Shakespeare? How can a parent with a junior high level math education help a child who encounters problems with physics or geometry homework? These are not failures of will but failures of opportunity and educational access across generations.
More significantly, the real challenge is remedying a situation where people assume that having the same curriculum and quality of instruction in a classroom means that students have the same opportunities. This assumption ignores what is happening in the child's home—a space where educational readiness is built or undermined long before a student enters the classroom. Even more critical is the fact that these problems are cumulative in nature. At early age levels, the child's curriculum may surpass the parent's educational level, so that the parent is unable to help for years. As a consequence, most students from these backgrounds begin to fall behind in the curriculum during their elementary years.
By the time students reach higher grade levels, they may be literally several years behind in their education. Even their best efforts may be insufficient to keep them passing courses, much less excelling in them. A student who is two years behind in reading comprehension in third grade faces compounding difficulties in fourth grade science, fifth grade social studies, and beyond. Each subject builds on previous knowledge, and each gap widens the distance between that student and their peers whose parents could provide tutoring, enrichment, or even just informed feedback on their work.
This is a substantial and often underestimated problem. The achievement gap between students from different socioeconomic backgrounds is not merely a product of classroom instruction—it is a product of years of accumulated educational support or lack thereof in the home. When policymakers focus only on curriculum and instruction without addressing the learning environment in which students develop literacy and numeracy skills before formal schooling even begins, they miss the root of the disparity.
"Individual teacher action and systemic reform both required"
You’re 71% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.