Patient Safety Through Medication Reconciliation
This paper examines the role of medication reconciliation in improving patient safety within the U.S. healthcare system, particularly in the context of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Medication errors remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting both inpatient and outpatient populations. The paper argues that Home Care Agencies should implement medication reconciliation processes to reduce these errors and improve care quality. It outlines a set of data collection tools — including OASIS, HHCAHPS, Organizational Performance Improvement, Quarterly Reports, and Supervisory Visits — as practical instruments for achieving accurate and effective medication reconciliation.
- Introduction: ACA context and medication error problem
- Aim: Objective to improve safety via reconciliation
- Materials and Methods: Five data collection tools described
- Results: Reconciliation identified as error-reduction solution
- Conclusion: Summary of tools and safety strategy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses a structured poster-style format — Introduction, Aim, Methods, Results, and Conclusion — giving the argument a clear, logical progression suited to academic presentation contexts.
- Grounds its recommendation in a concrete clinical problem (medication errors as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality), lending urgency to the policy proposal.
- Identifies specific, named data collection tools (OASIS, HHCAHPS, Quarterly Reports, Supervisory Visits) rather than speaking in abstractions, making the methodology actionable.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evidence-based policy argumentation: it begins by identifying a measurable clinical problem, anchors the problem in cited statistics and peer-reviewed sources, then proposes a targeted intervention with specific tools. This mirrors the structure of quality-improvement proposals in health sciences, where the problem statement, intervention, and evaluation method are clearly separated.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an abstract-style summary before moving into an Introduction that contextualizes medication errors within ACA-era healthcare. A brief Aim section states the single objective. The Materials and Methods section enumerates and distinguishes the five data tools. Results synthesize the findings and reinforce the central recommendation, and the Conclusion recaps the main argument concisely. The reference list follows APA formatting conventions.
Introduction
In the contemporary health environment, the United States is undergoing fundamental changes as a result of the adoption of the ACA, commonly known as the Affordable Care Act or "Obamacare." The new law is rapidly increasing the number of American residents who have health insurance and raising coverage among diverse populations. Despite the benefits associated with the ACA, the quality of healthcare delivery remains limited in the United States due to issues such as medication errors.
Typically, medication error is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity, accounting for one out of every 845 inpatient deaths and one out of every 130 outpatient deaths. As Beatrice (2014, p. 153) notes, "Any time that information about a patient's medication is communicated, there is a potential for error."
These associated problems have led an increasing number of patients to demand high-quality healthcare. Patients are also seeking a greater variety of treatment options. It is therefore critical for Home Care Agencies to implement changes using medical reconciliation to eliminate or reduce medication errors within the healthcare environment (Musgrave, 2013). Moreover, Home Health Agencies are required to implement policies that build a positive reputation and reduce provider mistakes in order to sustain revenue. Implementation of medication reconciliation will allow healthcare organizations to provide accurate patient treatments (Greenwald, Halasyamani, & Greene, et al., 2010).
Aim
The objective of this paper is to improve patients' safety through medication reconciliation.
Materials and Methods
The medication reconciliation process involves verifying medication name, frequency, and dose by cross-checking with physician or doctor's notes to ascertain accuracy. The data collection tools used in this process consist of:
These tools assist in preventing medication errors and each has distinct strengths. First, OASIS serves as a data collection tool focusing on patient outcomes. It assists providers in collecting a wide variety of data, including information related to hospital transfer and discharge stages of care. Similarly, HHCAHPS serves as a data collection tool used to enhance patient and customer satisfaction. The Organizational Performance Improvement component has a multi-directional focus aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of care. Quarterly Reports provide an accurate view of organizational performance and support patient–clinician interaction to promote effective care outcomes. Supervisory Visits further reinforce accurate medication management by enabling direct oversight of care delivery.
Conclusion
This paper discusses a strategy to enhance patient safety through medication reconciliation. Medication error is identified as one of the primary issues reducing the quality of healthcare delivery in the United States. The use of tools such as OASIS, HHCAHPS, Quarterly Reports, Supervisory Visits, and Organizational Performance Improvement provides healthcare organizations with a practical framework for implementing effective medication reconciliation and delivering safer, more accurate patient care.
References
Beatrice, T. (2014). Improving patient safety by improving medication communication. Orthopaedic Nursing, 28(3), 153–154.
Cornu, P., Steurbaut, S., Leysen, T., et al. (2012). Effect of medication reconciliation at hospital admission on medication discrepancies during hospitalization and at discharge for geriatric patients. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 46, 484–494.
Greenwald, J. L., Halasyamani, L., & Greene, J., et al. (2010). Making inpatient medication reconciliation patient centered, clinically relevant and implementable: A consensus statement on key principles and necessary first steps. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 5, 477.
Musgrave, C. R., Pilcher, N. A., & Taber, D. J. (2013). Improving transplant patient safety through pharmacist discharge medication reconciliation. American Journal of Transplantation, 13(3), 796–801.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.