Peak's Pricing Strategy for Entering the Brazilian Market

Problem Statement and Overview

Peak must decide on a pricing strategy for entering the Brazilian market. It has narrowed its options down to three: penetration pricing, skim pricing, and cost-plus pricing. This report evaluates the company, the market, and each of these three options in order to determine the best choice of pricing strategy for entering the Brazilian market.

SWOT Analysis of Peak's Market Position

The SWOT analysis is a tool whereby a company examines its internal strengths and weaknesses alongside its external threats and opportunities, providing context for the decision it faces. The strategy a company chooses should reflect either leveraging strengths to take advantage of opportunities, or shoring up weaknesses to defend against threats. In this case, where Peak is determining a strategy for entering a new market, it will likely consider how it can leverage its strengths to capitalize on this opportunity (Furgison, 2019).

There are several strengths that Peak brings to this situation. First, Peak produces the Kilimanjaro, a high-quality harness that occupies the premium segment in the United States. The quality standards for climbing harnesses do not vary substantially across markets, for two key reasons: climbing is an international sport, and safety standards for climbing gear are critical. Any gear that fails to meet international safety standards will simply not be purchased by serious climbers, as doing so would put their lives at risk. It is therefore reasonable to assume that gear considered premium in the US would also be regarded as premium in Brazil.

A second strength is that Peak already has a distributor in Brazil — Amazonas. With distribution already in place, Peak can approach market entry in a variety of ways. This provides built-in flexibility: they can pursue penetration pricing, supported by Amazonas's volume sales capacity, or they can pursue premium pricing through the same channel.

A third strength is that the Brazilian climbing market appears to be sophisticated. The country hosts many international competitions, and its sizeable middle and upper classes can afford quality gear and likely travel internationally to climb. The brand may already be familiar to many Brazilian climbers, and this market maturity gives Peak the option to treat Brazil as any other sophisticated market — including the option of skim pricing.

Peak's most significant weakness is limited knowledge of the Brazilian market. While its distributor, Amazonas, possesses some in-market knowledge, Amazonas has a vested interest in whatever strategy Peak adopts and may not be a fully unbiased source of information. This forces Peak to either trust Amazonas or make decisions without sufficient data. This weakness is especially relevant to skim pricing — Peak does not know with confidence how the Brazilian market will respond to premium pricing. It suspects that Brazilian climbers are willing to pay a premium, but if those climbers are well-traveled, the question becomes whether they will pay a premium price domestically and, if so, how large a premium they are willing to bear.

A related weakness is that Peak's experience in Brazil is limited, and the company appears substantially dependent on Amazonas for its market presence.

Peak also has several opportunities. It is entering what is believed to be a sophisticated market with strong growth potential over the next 24 months. If that growth potential materializes, it may favor a penetration pricing approach to capture market share early. If premium demand proves robust, a skim strategy could be equally justified. The Brazilian opportunity is presenting itself in a way that keeps multiple strategic doors open.

A further opportunity is using Brazil as a springboard for the rest of South America. Brazil is the region's largest market, but other strong markets exist — particularly among the Andean countries. Lessons learned in Brazil can likely be applied to market entry efforts elsewhere in the region.

On the threat side, competition is a primary concern. Even if Peak successfully differentiates itself from domestic competitors, other international players are likely to enter an attractive market. If Brazil's climbing market is as promising as expected, Peak will not be the only foreign company seeking a foothold. Increased competition could undermine skim pricing by enabling rivals to undercut the Kilimanjaro with comparable-quality harnesses at lower prices.

Foreign currency exchange rate risk presents another threat. When exchange rates shift, the value of profits earned in a foreign market can change significantly. If Peak adopts penetration pricing, its already-slim margins could erode further if the Brazilian real moves unfavorably. The real currently operates under a partial float against the dollar, meaning some degree of exchange rate risk is inherent in any engagement with the Brazilian market (Downey, 2019).

Finally, there is risk associated with dependence on Amazonas for distribution. While there is no specific reason to expect Amazonas to be a problematic partner, disputes could arise, and Amazonas would hold an informational advantage in any legal conflict by virtue of its familiarity with the Brazilian legal system. Recent legal reforms have made Brazil's business environment more hospitable for foreign companies, however (Dourado et al., 2019).

In summary, the main opportunity lies in the size and expected growth of Brazil's climbing gear market. Peak is well-positioned to capitalize on this attractiveness, but that same attractiveness will draw other competitors — a factor that must weigh heavily on any pricing strategy decision. Peak's relationship with Amazonas is a critical dependency and can function as either a strength or a weakness depending on how it is managed.

PEST Analysis of the Brazilian Market

The political environment in Brazil has been variable over recent decades but is currently at least nominally favorable to foreign business interests. Former President Dilma Rousseff was impeached in 2016. Brazil has historically performed poorly on the Corruption Perceptions Index, currently ranking 106th out of 180 countries with a score of 35 — considered poor (Transparency International, 2019). The administration of Jair Bolsonaro is broadly oriented toward business interests, and moves to streamline regulations and lower taxes may benefit Peak and its target market in the short term, even if longer-term political stability remains uncertain (Riley, 2019).

Brazil's economic environment presents a mixed picture. With a pro-business government in place, expectations for economic improvement have been relatively optimistic, and this sentiment may partly explain aggressive growth projections for Brazil's climbing scene, which depends on a healthy middle and upper class with disposable income. Brazil is the world's eighth-largest economy. Inflation is at record lows, though GDP growth is sluggish at approximately 1%, and interest rates have been lowered (CIA, 2020). Growth rates from 2017 onward are expected to hold or improve modestly, in contrast to prior years of contraction (Trading Economics, 2020). The onset of the coronavirus pandemic, however, will impose negative economic pressures on Brazil, as it will on every other country.

The social environment is generally favorable. The climbing market is expected to grow rapidly in the coming years, driven by interest among middle- and upper-class Brazilians. While Brazil's GDP per capita is approximately $15,000 (CIA, 2020), substantial wealth disparity means the addressable target market — roughly one-third of the population — is approximately comparable in size to the United Kingdom when considered in isolation (World Bank, 2012). This middle-class cohort's enthusiasm for rock climbing creates an attractive social environment and supports ample distribution infrastructure.

The technological environment is also favorable. Brazil's middle class has broad access to modern technology, including mobile applications, enabling Peak to reach its target market through digital channels. There are no significant barriers to online marketing, meaning Peak could engage a local agency to create Portuguese-language advertising and leverage the precise targeting capabilities of major social media advertising platforms. In this respect, marketing in Brazil is not substantially different from marketing in the US, with the primary adjustments being linguistic and cultural. Amazonas may be able to assist with this, though Peak could also pursue it independently.

Taken together, the PEST analysis indicates that the Brazilian market holds significant promise. Economic growth is modest, but the target market is large and expanding. The business environment is improving for foreign companies, which reduces country risk. No major red flags emerge from the PEST analysis that would fundamentally challenge the decision to enter the Brazilian market.

Conclusion and Recommendation

Overall, the best option for Peak's entry into the Brazilian market is penetration pricing. This approach carries some financial risk, as margins will initially be slimmer than under a skim or cost-plus strategy. However, establishing market share is strategically important, given that much of the opportunity in the Brazilian market is tied to expected growth over the next couple of years. Capturing a meaningful percentage share in a rapidly growing market is the most reliable pathway to long-term profit, and penetration pricing is the strategy most likely to achieve that objective.

References

Chappelow, J. (2019). Monopolistic competition. Investopedia. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/monopolisticmarket.asp

CIA World Factbook. (2020). Brazil. Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/br.html

Decker, A. (2020). The ultimate guide to pricing strategies. HubSpot. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from https://blog.hubspot.com/sales/pricing-strategy

Dourado, A., Canabrava, L., Spadano, L., Alvarenga, P., Salles, R., Advogados, F., Lourencao, M., & Trung, T. (2019). Doing business in Brazil: An overview. Thomson Reuters Practical Law. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/0-503-8385

Downey, L. (2019). Brazilian real. Investopedia. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/forex/a/brl-brazilian-real.asp

Furgison, L. (2019). SWOT analysis, step 5: Developing actionable strategies. BPlans.com. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from https://articles.bplans.com/swot-analysis-challenge-day-5-turning-swot-analysis-actionable-strategies/

Kokemuller, N. (2020). Entry pricing strategy. Houston Chronicle. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/entry-pricing-strategy-61428.html

Riley, C. (2019). Jair Bolsonaro says Brazil is open for business. CNN Business. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/22/business/bolsonaro-brazil-davos-foreign-investment/index.html

Trading Economics. (2020). Brazil GDP. Trading Economics. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from https://tradingeconomics.com/brazil/gdp

Transparency International. (2019). Corruption perceptions index: Brazil. Transparency International. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from https://www.transparency.org/country/BRA

World Bank. (2012). In Brazil, an emergent middle class takes off. World Bank. Retrieved March 28, 2020, from