Performance Management Strategies for Employee Motivation
This paper examines a performance management crisis at a private liberal arts university where employees have grown disengaged and dismissive of the appraisal process, largely because past feedback has produced no tangible changes and pay increases have been awarded regardless of effort. Drawing on scholarly literature by Cardy and Leonard, Leeuw and Berg, and Stone, the paper identifies two alternative solutions — withdrawing pay-for-performance incentives versus developing employee capabilities aligned with organizational goals — and recommends the latter. The recommended approach involves restructuring performance appraisal interviews, building employee understanding of the process, and delivering targeted workshops and training programs. The paper argues that aligning individual development with institutional goals produces more sustainable behavioral change than punitive incentive withdrawal.
- Introduction to Performance Management: Defines performance management and introduces the university scenario
- The Problem: Employees distrust management and dismiss appraisal process
- Alternative Solutions: Two options: withdraw incentives or develop employee capabilities
- The Recommended Solution: Capability-development approach aligned with institutional goals
- Conclusion: HR must align individual and organizational goals through development programs
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper follows a clear problem–solution structure, grounding each stage in relevant academic citations rather than relying on assertion alone.
- It presents two genuine alternative solutions before defending one, demonstrating critical evaluation rather than a one-sided argument.
- The recommendation is tightly tied to the specific institutional goals described in the scenario (diversity, construction projects, alumni engagement), making the argument concrete and context-specific.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models evidence-based argumentation in applied HR writing. The author introduces a theoretical framework (Cardy and Leonard's definition of performance management), uses empirical support (Leeuw and Berg on behavior-driven performance improvement), and synthesizes practitioner insight (Stone on poorly designed processes) to build a layered, credible case for the recommended intervention.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a conceptual introduction establishing definitions and stakes, then narrows to a specific organizational scenario. A dedicated problem section diagnoses employee attitudes and trust issues. Two alternative solutions are weighed in their own section. The solution section is the longest and most developed, walking through appraisal redesign, attitudinal change, and skills-development programs in sequence. A concise conclusion reinforces the central argument without introducing new material.
Introduction to Performance Management
Contrary to popular belief, improved performance by employees in a particular organization is not always linked to incentives. In today's dynamic business environment, it is crucial for human resource managers to balance the needs of individuals with those of the organization. One critical component that leads to good individual as well as organizational performance is the application of an effective performance management process. In fact, companies that invest in good performance management practices generally perform better than those that do not measure and manage their performance (Leeuw and Berg, 2010). According to Cardy and Leonard (2011), performance management can be defined as the integrated and strategic approach used by human resource managers to deliver successful results by improving the performance of all individuals in the organization. It ensures that the goals of an organization are achieved in an efficient and effective manner, while at the same time maintaining good relations between the management team and the employees.
From the scenario, the university, a private liberal arts institution, appears to be a favorite in the community. This can be attributed to its low faculty-to-student ratio, its proximity to New York City, and its strong partnership with the Beacon community (Riccio, 2014). With more than 700 employees and an endowment that has reached $350 million, the institution is at its financial peak. However, despite being named one of the best organizations to work for in New York, the Director of Organizational Management has noticed that employees are highly unmotivated, and this is beginning to affect their performance. To better understand the cause of employees' low morale, this paper presents the performance management measures applied by the university, identifies the underlying problems, and recommends the most effective performance management practice that should be adopted.
The Problem
The employees at the university have lost faith in the management team. When the Director suggests that employees talk to their supervisors about the challenges they faced throughout the year and propose improvements, they outright decline, asserting that it is of no use because past feedback has never amounted to any real changes (Riccio, 2014). Moreover, employees do not communicate openly during meetings; instead, they wait until meetings have ended to voice their personal opinions privately, and they feel that those opinions have consistently been ignored.
The major issue that the Human Resource managers need to explore, however, is the negative attitude employees hold toward the performance management process itself. Supervisors view the process as a "necessary evil" with no substantial benefits, and this attitude filters down to the employees, who are unwilling to cooperate with HR managers and claim that they receive pay increases regardless of the effort they put in (Riccio, 2014). Although this has been true in the past, a new problem has emerged: there are considerable financial uncertainties this year and employees are not guaranteed a salary increase. HR therefore needs to develop an effective performance management practice that will be valued by both leadership and employees, one that will improve performance and reduce dependence on automatic pay increases.
Conclusion
The university's employees feel neglected, unmotivated, and unappreciated. The institution's HR team needs to change their negative attitude toward management and motivate them to work harder, given that a salary increase is not guaranteed in the current year. To achieve this, the best solution is to implement performance management practices that target both individual and organizational success. Such practices align the goals of the individual with those of the organization and capitalize on employees' existing talents to achieve the set objectives. HR should therefore develop programs, workshops, and initiatives that strengthen various employee skills. Once employees see that the institution is genuinely invested in their personal growth, they will appreciate their own contribution more fully and work harder to help the university achieve its goals.
References
Cardy, R., & Leonard, B. (2011). Performance Management: Concepts, Skills and Exercises (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Leeuw, S., & Berg, J. P. (2010). Improving operational performance by influencing shopfloor behavior via performance management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1), 224–335. Retrieved April 9, 2015, from http://www.isihome.ir/freearticle/ISIHome.ir-21006.pdf
Riccio, S. (2014). Hudson College Scenario C: Performance Management. Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from https://www.shrm.org
Stone, R. N. (2009). Achieving results with a performance-centered design framework. Performance Improvement, 48(5), 37–44. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://search.proquest.com.proxy-campuslibrary.rockies.edu/docview/237234715/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.