This paper presents a personal code of ethics built on two foundational principles: a modified version of the Golden Rule that emphasizes genuine empathy, and a commitment to integrity and moral character. The author argues that truly ethical behavior requires placing oneself in another person's specific circumstances rather than projecting one's own preferences onto others. The paper then examines how these principles function in everyday life, including the personal rewards of volunteering and acting with integrity. Finally, a workplace harassment case study tests the ethical framework, analyzing the competing claims of loyalty to a friend, utilitarian concern for workplace welfare, and deontological obligation to report policy violations.
The paper demonstrates applied ethical reasoning by using multiple theoretical lenses — utilitarian, deontological, and virtue ethics — to evaluate a single dilemma. Rather than selecting one theory as universally correct, the author weighs each framework against the specific facts of the case, modeling the kind of pluralistic ethical analysis expected in professional and academic ethics courses.
The paper divides into two halves. The first half (core values, moral character, ethics in life) establishes the author's personal ethical framework through reflection and personal example. The second half applies that framework to a structured case study, moving from fact-finding through stakeholder identification, theoretical analysis, and a final reasoned decision. This two-part structure — theory then application — is characteristic of professional ethics writing at the undergraduate level.
My core ethical value can best be summed up as follows: always put yourself in the other person's shoes. I consider this to be a modified version of the Golden Rule — "do unto others as you would have done unto you." The Golden Rule suggests that you should treat other people as you would like to be treated. In my version, I have modified this principle by asking: "If I were like this person, with his or her experiences and perspectives, would I like to be treated in such a manner?" For example, I might not mind having people tease me about my appearance in good fun. However, someone who had been bullied for most of his or her life might feel threatened by what I consider friendly banter. It is not enough for me to say, "because I would not mind, he would not mind." I must put myself in the other person's shoes before I judge him or her, and before I act. I also expect the same consideration of others: that they treat me, my friends, and all other human beings with respect, even when we have different worldviews.
Empathy is a critical component of my ethical system. However, I am not a complete moral relativist. Although I believe it is essential to empathize with other human beings, that does not mean I must completely suspend judgment of other people's actions. Just as I set a high standard of empathy for myself, I set a similarly high standard for other people. I do not condone cruelty or malice in others, just as I do not act with cruelty or malice myself.
The stress that I place upon empathy is grounded in another core principle: my need to make my life meaningful. I do not believe it is enough to live a life that is secure, to make a great deal of money, or simply to fulfill societal expectations. The actions I perform should leave the world a better place. This does not mean being a "people pleaser," given that sometimes being a moral person requires making uncomfortable choices.
I try to live with integrity. Living with integrity means keeping your word and honoring your obligations to others. This value was ingrained in me early in life. Growing up, I had responsibilities around the house, to do well in school, and to pitch in when needed. I was expected to honor these expectations, just as my parents honored their obligations to me. Having a strong sense of duty, a sense of obligation, and a willingness to endure difficult situations are all part of having a strong moral character.
Moral character also means upholding one's core principles even when there is pressure to deviate from them. I know from personal experience that when faced with peer pressure, it is all too easy to think: "just this one time, I will give in." But that one time can lead to another — and another — until one's entire moral system collapses. Although morality is not a rigid rulebook, and some flexibility is necessary based upon empathy and circumstance, I try to be rigorous with myself and not abandon my basic sense of what is right, except under extreme circumstances.
Because I think that being a good person and making others feel at home and right with the world is the key to happiness, I do not believe it is possible to live a truly happy life unless one is ethical. Acting in an unethical manner means hurting the people you care about, and hurting others ultimately leaves you alone. Although deceitful and vengeful people may occasionally appear successful, this success is usually fleeting in light of the damage they do to themselves and to the welfare of others over time.
Being ethical does not necessarily mean being unhappy, however. Very often, it simply feels good to help other people. A sense of reciprocation binds friendships together. Acting ethically and morally also gives me a sense of efficacy in the world. A good example is volunteering. I began volunteering out of a sense of obligation for school. However, I gradually came to see that volunteering boosted my self-esteem. It made me feel as if I could make a difference, and I loved seeing the smiling faces of the people I helped. I gained practical and social skills through those efforts. By acting ethically, I increased my own happiness and the happiness of others.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.