Personal Ethics and Professional Standards in Counseling

Introduction

A counselor's personal ethical values inevitably follow them into the counseling room. The central question this paper explores is how those personal values shape and impact a counselor's professional ethical positions in practice.

The Value of Being Non-Judgmental and Respectful

Being non-judgmental is critical to effective counseling. Counselors need to encourage their clients to open up, and if they are judgmental, clients will feel judged and will not speak freely (Johnston, 1999). The non-judgmental stance applies specifically to refraining from judging clients for what they have done or what they are suffering from. There are, however, judgments a counselor must make in the course of treatment and interaction with a client — judgments that help determine what is morally and clinically appropriate depending on the situation. Non-judgment, in the ethical sense, applies to assessing the client's attitudes, beliefs, and behavior without condemnation.

As a counselor, one cannot leave personal ethical values outside the counseling room, since those values are necessary to ensure compliance with professional ethical requirements (Gibson, 2005). Holding moral values does not mean the counselor is judging the client; rather, it indicates that the counselor is mature enough to maintain their own values while still assisting the client. The key is that the counselor should avoid applying their moral values to the client's situation.

When counseling a person who has committed a crime, it is particularly difficult to remain non-judgmental. The client's actions may directly contradict the counselor's values, making it hard not to pass judgment. Remaining non-judgmental, however, allows the counselor to look beyond the client's criminal history and focus on the counseling itself. Failure to respect the client and maintain a non-judgmental stance results in biased counseling sessions where the counselor does not provide the necessary assistance but instead focuses on the offense committed. This would be unethical, as the counselor would be exercising their authority based on personal moral values rather than the ethical standards of their profession. While respecting someone who has broken the law is difficult for most people — including counselors, who are human — the professional difference is that counselors must learn to maintain their moral values internally while conducting sessions according to the code of ethics (Perez-De-Albeniz & Holmes, 2000). The crimes a client has committed have no bearing on the counseling session and should not form the basis for judging the client.

Ethical Dilemmas in Counseling Practice

If a counselor lacks non-judgmental and respectful values, they are likely to encounter ethical dilemmas that can damage their career. The primary ethical dilemmas that may arise include conflicts with personal values, breaches of confidentiality, and failures of professional responsibility (Barnes & Murdin, 2001). All counselors bring personal values into the counseling room. According to Cottone (2001), a counselor must remain professional at all times and not allow personal values to interfere with the counseling session. A counselor should remain neutral; however, strongly held personal beliefs about the issues a client is discussing can make neutrality difficult to maintain. If the counselor is unable to remain neutral, they risk violating their ethical obligations in ways that are ultimately harmful to the client. The counselor's role is to guide the client so that the client can make their own informed decisions, not to influence those decisions based on the counselor's own values.

Confidentiality is an ethical dilemma that many counselors face on a daily basis. Counselors must maintain confidentiality in order to create the trust necessary for clients to speak openly. All consultations between a counselor and a client are confidential, but a counselor who does not respect their client may be tempted to discuss session content with friends or colleagues — a clear breach of the confidentiality agreement. If a client discovers that their counselor has shared session details with others, they may choose to terminate the relationship or pursue legal action. The most effective way to avoid a confidentiality breach is to adopt an unwavering practice of not discussing clients outside the professional context. Learning to respect clients and withhold judgment is a key part of sustaining this ethical standard.

The primary responsibility of a counselor is to their client (Forester-Miller, Davis, Association, & Alexandria, 1995). Selecting an appropriate intervention method must be driven by the individual client's needs, based on the counselor's careful analysis of the client's situation. A lack of individualized attention — for example, applying the same intervention to every client regardless of their circumstances — leads to ethical failures. Counselors must dedicate adequate time to developing individualized treatment plans, ensuring they have thoroughly analyzed each client before determining the most appropriate course of action.

References

Barnes, F. P., & Murdin, L. (2001). Values and ethics in the practice of psychotherapy and counselling. Open University Press.

Cottone, R. R. (2001). A social constructivism model of ethical decision making in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79(1), 39–45.

Daniels, J. A. (2001). Managed care, ethics, and counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79(1), 119–122.

Forester-Miller, H., Davis, T. E., Association, A. C., & Alexandria, V. (1995). A practitioner's guide to ethical decision making. American Counseling Association.

Gibson, S. (2005). On judgment and judgmentalism: How counselling can make people better. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(10), 575–577.

Johnston, M. (1999). On becoming non-judgmental: Some difficulties for an ethics of counselling. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(6), 487–490.

Perez-De-Albeniz, A., & Holmes, J. (2000). Meditation: Concepts, effects and uses in therapy. International Journal of Psychotherapy, 5(1), 49–58.

Weber, J., & Green, S. (1991). Principled moral reasoning: Is it a viable approach to promote ethical integrity? Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 325–333.