This paper reviews J.C. Petersen's "Why Don't We Listen Better?" (2007), a practical guide to improving communication through active listening and emotional awareness. The review examines Petersen's key concepts, including his two-level communication model and theories such as the "Flat Brain" concept, which explains how emotions can override logical thinking in dialogue. The reviewer reflects on personal experiences with ineffective listening in family relationships and discusses how Petersen's tools—including the listener-talker process and the TLC technique—can enhance communication in counseling and personal contexts. The paper concludes with concrete action steps for applying Petersen's methods to improve listening skills and relationship quality.
The book Why Don't We Listen Better? by J.C. Petersen (2007) is a practical guide to achieving good communication skills through active listening, understanding the speaker, and examining the communication process thoroughly. Learning to listen sets the foundation for healthy communication in relationships, both personally and professionally. This process occurs when the talker and listener are in a healthy environment where a good relationship can develop. When you are able to accept and value one another, you begin sharing and connecting with each other. The book serves as a roadmap for self-discovery, focusing on communication techniques that promote fulfilling relationships.
Petersen identifies how many people encounter common yet overlooked communication errors. When experiencing these errors, Petersen provides guidance on overcoming particular barriers that can help readers gain positive growth in their communication efforts. A key insight is that communication breakdown often occurs because the listener fails to perceive the true point being verbalized—specifically, the emotion behind it. That emotion is frequently interpreted as an attack or defense to an attack, which becomes indistinguishable from the same thing (Petersen, 2007, p. 108).
According to Petersen, communication originates from three sources: the brain (which produces our thoughts), the stomach (which holds emotions), and the heart (where these elements converge). Petersen calls these "the inner nudges that tell us whether we are uncomfortable, happy, excited, frustrated," and so on. A person who communicates well can balance all three to produce productive communication. Within this framework, Petersen (2007) identifies two distinct levels of communication. The first level involves exchanging information and discussing points of view, focusing on factual information. This level lacks depth and does not fulfill relational requirements. Level two communication delves deeper than words, moving toward more satisfying relationships (Petersen, 2007, p. 19). At this level, emotional attachment and the sharing of feelings come into play. Information sharing becomes easier, clearer, and the process is more forgiving (Petersen, 2007, p. 19).
Petersen has developed several theories that demonstrate common communication downfalls, beginning with what he calls the "Flat Brain Theory of Emotion" (p. 10). In this theory, the stomach (emotional center) overtakes the brain (logical center) during communication. This means decisions are based on emotions rather than logic, leading to disruption in communication at the basic level. To remove this roadblock and achieve relatively normal functioning, one must reduce emotional disturbance, clarify thinking, increase self-confidence, and build supportive friendships. If you do not remove these roadblocks, you can find yourself in what Petersen calls the "Flat Brain Tango"—a spiraling pattern where the brain amplifies emotions and the problem escalates within the person's mind. This pattern resembles courtroom drama in which the desire to win becomes everything. You can escape the tango if you are willing to change your behavior.
"Connecting theory to family experiences and emotional needs"
I understand that listening is a major component in achieving the level of an effective listener. I also recognize that it can be quite annoying when a person continuously asks questions in response, so I feel the illustrations were somewhat dramatized. I know that as a counselor, one must ask questions to help a person understand what they are saying and to clarify and help resolve issues. This book is very helpful for counseling groups and couples. The Listener-Talker cards that Petersen developed were creative and proved helpful when counseling couples or families. I particularly liked the talking stick example, which ensures that when a person speaks, they are heard without interruptions. Such a tool would be powerful in today's society to ensure that everyone receives the respect they deserve.
The most crucial element one can take from this book is incorporating practical application into daily life. I am committed more than ever to become a better listener and to speak less. Often, I believe my thoughts are more important than those of the person I am listening to. Petersen (2007) explains that one should "listen first (and longer) and then, talk second" (p. 125). After reading this book, I realized that I sometimes become what Petersen (2007) calls a ritual listener—waiting quietly and watching the speaker, anticipating when they will finish so I can tell my story or make my point (p. 116). This is my personality blend, which others perceive as Competent and Submissive (7 DISC). My fiancé tells me I can be haughty, which aligns with my personality type. Since others value my knowledge, I need to find ways to share it without being conceited. I will follow the methods Petersen has provided to become a better listener. I will utilize chapter eighteen to improve my skills and become an effective listener, starting with one or two techniques and integrating them into my daily life before moving to others. I hope one day to counsel people with HIV/AIDS, and my listening ability will be crucial in that work.
One area I need to work on first is clarifying accurately what a person is trying to say without being overbearing. I have a habit of repeating what others say in my own way rather than in the way it was told to me. Petersen has helped me understand that some people simply need that extra voice or push to pull their ideas together. Most people have the resources they need to solve their problems; they just need to utilize them. Another area I need to focus on is being more direct with words and thoughts (decoding). According to Petersen (2007), one should "decode message by checking your translation with the talker" (p. 144). Often, I do not say exactly what I mean, and I do not state my intentions clearly. My fiancé is usually helpful in improving my skills in these lacking areas. I have been told that a person on the outside looking in can always see what is wrong with a particular situation. He can provide that inside perspective and help me see my downfalls when I am being pushy. Lastly, the TLC tool will be valuable in integrating into my listening skills. I will utilize it the next time I am in my mother's presence. I will tell her about what I have learned and explain that these are my feelings, not hers, and that I simply need a listening ear to get it off my chest. I will also keep the four goals of communication handy ("reduce emotional disturbance, clarify thinking, increase self-confidence, and build supportive friendships") (p. 30) and use them consistently. I believe this will be helpful not only as a reminder of what I want to accomplish but also to clarify the roles that should be taken in the listener-talker approach.
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.