P&G and Walmart Negotiation: CRM and Supply Chain Strategy
This paper examines the supplier-retailer relationship between Procter & Gamble (P&G) and Walmart during the late 1980s, focusing on the internal and external factors that produced a hostile, unproductive negotiating environment. The analysis identifies disintegrated departmental goals, asymmetric information flows, and a bottom-line-only sales culture as the root causes of P&G's stagnating growth and damaged customer relationships. Drawing on collaborative supply chain theory, the paper evaluates alternatives including Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI), Just-in-Time (JIT) manufacturing, and Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), and recommends a comprehensive realignment of organizational culture, cross-functional account management, and mutually beneficial CRM practices.
- Background: Origins of P&G–Walmart hostility in the 1980s
- Problem Statement: Disintegrated internal goals and distrustful external relations
- Analysis: Multi-layered causes: culture, competition, asymmetric information
- Collaborative Supply Chain Solutions: VMI, JIT, EDI, and cultural audit as remedies
- Conclusion and Recommendations: Specific steps for cultural and operational reform
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its recommendations in named theoretical frameworks — collaborative supply chain theory (Simatupang & Sridharan), Fisher's supply chain typology, and VMI/JIT models — rather than relying on unsupported assertions.
- Moves clearly from diagnosis to analysis to recommendation, maintaining a logical chain that connects internal organizational dysfunction to external relationship failure.
- Uses a concrete real-world example (Campbell Soup's EDI-based continuous replenishment) to illustrate how collaborative practices produce measurable results, strengthening its argument by analogy.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses asymmetric information as a unifying analytical concept, applying it both to inter-departmental friction within P&G and to the supplier-retailer relationship with Walmart. This dual application — internal and external — demonstrates the ability to apply a single theoretical construct at multiple levels of analysis, a hallmark of strong business case analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an executive-style summary of findings and recommendations before proceeding through a background section, a focused problem statement, an extended analysis, and a conclusion with specific recommendations. The analysis section carries the bulk of the argument and is subdivided implicitly around culture, information asymmetry, and collaborative models. The recommendation section is action-oriented, translating theoretical insights into concrete managerial steps such as cross-functional account teams and VMI adoption.
Background
Procter & Gamble (P&G) faced growth constraints and customer relationship management (CRM) issues with its large retail clients such as Walmart. Disintegrated operational and business-level management, lack of strategic direction, and poor CRM were the main issues confronting the company. Unnecessary competition with its own customers and hostile price and margin negotiations were draining the strategic growth opportunities that a company as large as P&G could have achieved through improvement in internal processes and CRM.
Having considered these issues through contemporary research-based business process models, it is recommended that P&G alter its organizational culture and strategy, and adopt a CRM-centered approach. Several alternatives — including those based on collaborative channel management, increased responsiveness to customer concerns, and business process management (BPM) improvement — may be applied after aligning the company's culture with the proposed improvements. Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI), Just-in-Time (JIT) manufacturing and supply chain management (SCM), and forward-looking strategic planning are proposed as options P&G can adopt to end the stalemate in its internal management and external relationships.
This case study concerns the supplier-retailer partnership between P&G and Walmart during the late 1980s. The partnership initiative was led by Tom Muccio, following a period of sub-par business growth for P&G in the 1980s. Two new product launches — Duncan Hines ready-to-serve cookies and Citrus Hill Orange Juice — were market failures significant enough to drain P&G's financial resources. Against a backdrop of lackluster growth and weak financial performance, the external environment was also becoming hostile for the profit margins of large suppliers. Retail store chains were increasing their bargaining power relative to large suppliers and were using "forward buying" and "diverting" as organized practices to gain financial advantage from suppliers' price promotions.
The internal environment of P&G was equally counterproductive. The company relied on a military-type organizational structure in which each department pursued its own narrow, often department-specific goals while ignoring the overall customer satisfaction objective. Walmart was P&G's third-largest retail customer, yet the relationship was managed entirely through sales personnel (Sebenius & Knebel, 2010). This resulted in both organizations — supplier and retailer — pursuing conflicting and aggressive strategies to cut into each other's profit margins. A bureaucratic and unresponsive organizational structure within P&G, combined with increased market competition and ever-growing retailer bargaining power, had compelled P&G's sales teams to adopt hostile selling techniques, often at the expense of customers' margins or P&G's own long-term growth. Both P&G and Walmart were distrustful of each other's motives, and P&G was failing to recapture the revenue and profit-margin growth it had once achieved.
References
Corsten, D., & Kumar, N. (2005). Do suppliers benefit from collaborative relationships with large retailers? An empirical investigation of efficient consumer response adoption. Journal of Marketing, 80–94.
Fisher, M. L. (1997). What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Business Review, 75, 105–117.
Goyal, S. K., & Gupta, Y. P. (1989). Integrated inventory models: The buyer-vendor coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 41(3), 261–269.
Hagel, J. (2002). Out of the box: Strategies for achieving profits today and growth tomorrow through web services. Harvard Business Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87–104.
Sebenius, J., & Knebel, E. (2010). Tom Muccio: Negotiating the P&G relationship with Wal-Mart (A). Harvard Business School.
Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2002). The collaborative supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 13(1), 15–30.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.