Book Review: The Princes in the Tower by Alison Weir
This book review examines Alison Weir's historical investigation, The Princes in the Tower, which explores one of England's oldest unsolved murder mysteries: the disappearance and presumed deaths of Edward V and his brother Richard, Duke of York, in 1483. The review assesses Weir's methodology, her reliance on primary sources such as Mancini's chronicle, and her case against Richard III as the likely culprit. It also considers the book's tone, structure, and effectiveness as both a scholarly and accessible work of historical non-fiction.
- Overview and Purpose: Weir's aims and approach introduced
- Synopsis and Historical Background: Events of 1483 and Richard's rise
- Sources, Theme, and Methodology: Mancini, objectivity, and evidence-based approach
- Characterization and Narrative Strengths: Richard's character, tone, and narrative style
- Final Assessment: Overall verdict on Weir's argument and book
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review maintains a clear evaluative stance throughout, consistently returning to Weir's stated objective of objectivity and measuring the book against that standard.
- It integrates direct quotations from the book to support its claims, lending the review credibility and grounding observations in the text itself.
- The paper balances summary with analysis — it explains what the book argues while also offering the reviewer's own assessment of tone, structure, and persuasiveness.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The review uses evaluative framing effectively: rather than merely summarizing the book's content, the reviewer repeatedly asks whether Weir achieves her own stated goals. This technique — holding an author accountable to their declared intentions — is a hallmark of strong academic book reviews and demonstrates critical reading rather than passive reception.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing overview that establishes the book's subject and purpose, then moves into a plot synopsis, followed by an examination of Weir's sources and thematic focus. The review then evaluates narrative and stylistic strengths before closing with a summative judgment. This introduction-to-conclusion arc is logical and well-paced for a short academic book review.
Overview and Purpose
Alison Weir examines one of England's oldest murder mysteries in her historical investigation into the deaths of Edward V and his brother Richard, Duke of York. While most English readers are familiar with the treachery of Richard III thanks to Shakespeare's play of the same name, Weir throws a magnifying glass over the facts of the case to explore whether the popular legend — that Richard III killed the two young princes — is true after all. The book reads like a spellbinder, supplying the reader with all the background story, clues, and details needed to draw the conclusion that Richard III was indeed the culprit, and that his treachery was what enabled him to soar so quickly to political heights, only to fall just as rapidly under the weight of his own duplicity.
As Weir notes, her objective with The Princes in the Tower was not to sensationalize the story. She states, "the book was not written with the intention of fueling the controversy, but because there is a need for the subject to be dealt with from an objective viewpoint" (1) — and Weir bases that viewpoint on logic and research.
Synopsis and Historical Background
The synopsis of The Princes in the Tower is that Edward V and his brother Richard, Duke of York, were next in line for the crown following the death of Edward IV in 1483. Richard of Gloucester maneuvered to have the princes declared illegitimate by pointing to the pre-contract of marriage that Edward IV had held with Lady Eleanor Butler. Richard then got Parliament to issue the Titulus Regius, which was enacted the following year. Meanwhile, Gloucester was crowned as next in line, and the suddenly illegitimate princes were whisked away to the Tower of London and never seen again.
The perspective used throughout the book is that of the historian, interested only in the facts. Like a skilled prosecutor, Weir lays out the character of Richard, establishes a motive, and unspools the circumstances and evidence surrounding the treachery.
Sources, Theme, and Methodology
The main theme of Weir's book is that the facts of the case are what matter: fanciful speculation or bias — either for or against Richard — has no place in the work. She describes her sources and lays them before the reader, citing Mancini's earlier history as a fair and reputable account that should reasonably be considered legitimate. Weir states that Mancini was "a man of integrity" who "confined himself only to the facts, and avoided falling into the habit affected by so many contemporary writers, that of using historical facts to illustrate a lesson in morality" (2). In other words, Weir sets out to validate the history presented by Mancini, and for that reason the book is full of information surrounding the main characters involved.
The reader should come away from the work with a firm grasp of who was involved in the murders of the young princes and what the motive was. Appropriately, Weir opens the book with two excerpts from Shakespeare's Richard III, which describe both the deaths of the young boys and the terror at the root of Richard's soul for having ordered their deaths. These excerpts foreshadow the conclusion Weir reaches — that Richard III was the culprit — and it is a fitting opening to the book, since the character of Richard is so eloquently embedded in English lore thanks to the Bard's treatment of the historical figure on the stage.
Works Cited
Weir, Alison. The Princes in the Tower. NY: Ballantine Books, 2011.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.