Essay Undergraduate 1,663 words

Psychological Contract and the Changing Employer-Employee Relationship

~9 min read 6 sections Business · Employee Relation

Abstract

This paper examines how the employer-employee relationship has transformed over recent decades and the implications of that transformation for human resource management (HRM). Drawing on organizational behavior literature, the paper defines the psychological contract as the unwritten, perceptual agreement governing mutual obligations between employers and employees. It identifies key drivers of change — including increased competition, economic volatility, globalization, technological advances, and the rise of younger workforce generations — and discusses consequences such as the shift from relational to transactional employment relationships. The paper concludes by outlining HRM strategies for redefining psychological contracts to align with the modern work environment.

Key Takeaways

Introduction: Context, scope, and central research questions
Defining the Psychological Contract: Unwritten mutual expectations between employer and employee
Factors Driving the Changing Employer-Employee Relationship: Competition, globalization, technology, and generational shifts
Consequences of the New Employment Relationship: Short-term contracts, reduced trust, and transactional dynamics
HRM Strategies for Redefining the Psychological Contract: HRM actions to realign contracts with modern workforce needs
Conclusion: Summary of key findings and HRM implications

✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

Clearly defines a central theoretical concept (the psychological contract) before applying it analytically, giving the argument a solid foundation.
Balances multiple causal factors — competitive pressure, economic shocks, generational change — rather than attributing the shift to a single cause, demonstrating nuanced analysis.
Acknowledges both employer and employee perspectives throughout, avoiding one-sided framing and strengthening overall credibility.
Uses a consistent citation base drawn from peer-reviewed journals and specialist texts, lending academic authority to each claim.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper exemplifies theory-to-application reasoning: it introduces the psychological contract as an established theoretical construct, traces empirical and contextual factors that have disrupted it, and then translates those findings into actionable HRM recommendations. This move from concept → evidence → practice is a hallmark of applied organizational behavior scholarship.

Structure breakdown

The paper follows a logical five-part progression: (1) an introduction that establishes relevance and scope, (2) a definitional section grounding the core concept, (3) an analysis of driving forces behind relational change, (4) a discussion of consequences — including the relational-to-transactional shift — and (5) prescriptive HRM guidance, rounded off by a brief conclusion that synthesizes the key takeaways.

📘 Read the full essay guide → Build your outline → Generate a thesis → Generate citations → 📚 More Employee Relation examples →

Essay 1,663 words

Introduction

Organizations now operate in a rapidly changing world. Changes in consumer behavior, increased competitive pressure, technological advancements, and regulatory shifts over the last few decades have generally compelled organizations to adjust their strategies, objectives, policies, and actions in an attempt to enhance organizational efficiency and profitability (Freese, Schalk & Croon, 2011; Ulen, 2015; Abu-Doleh & Hammou, 2015). The ability to accommodate change has been identified as a vital ingredient of success in the constantly evolving operational environment (Wellin, 2007).

While its importance cannot be overstated, adapting to change has had a significant impact on the psychological contract — the intangible employer-employee relationship particularly exemplified by mutual expectations between employer and employee (Smissen, Schalk & Freese, 2013). The shifting psychological contract has consequently presented a significant challenge for organizations, specifically their human resource management (HRM) function. That challenge relates to maintaining and improving employee motivation, commitment, and job satisfaction, which tend to be crucial drivers of both individual and organizational productivity and performance (Smissen, Schalk & Freese, 2013).

It is imperative for organizations to acknowledge the shifting psychological contract and create new contracts that are favorable to both employer and employee. With reference to literature in organizational behavior and HRM, this paper explores the changing employer-employee relationship and its implications for HRM. First, a comprehensive definition of the psychological contract is offered. Attention is then paid to the factors responsible for the changing employer-employee relationship, the possible consequences of the new relationship, and the actions HRM can take to create contracts that resonate with the modern work environment.

Defining the Psychological Contract

The notion of the psychological contract is not new — it has dominated organizational behavior and HRM discourses since the 1960s (Wellin, 2007). Though there is no universally accepted definition, the concept generally denotes the unwritten agreement that defines the relationship between an organization (employer) and its employees (Sims, 1994). It refers to the beliefs, perceptions, or expectations that employers and employees hold concerning their obligations to one another (Robinson, Kraatz & Rosseau, 1994).

Essentially, by investing in employees, employers expect certain outcomes, and vice versa (Ishaq & Shamsher, 2016). For instance, by providing competitive remuneration, job security, and professional development opportunities, an organization often expects loyalty and commitment from employees in return. Equally, by demonstrating commitment to their work, employees typically expect their employer to reciprocate by offering financial and/or non-financial benefits. Unlike formal contracts between employers and employees, psychological contracts are perceptual in nature: there may be varying interpretations of the expectations employers and employees hold of each other (Freese, Schalk & Croon, 2011).

4 Sections Hidden · 925 words

Factors Driving the Changing Employer-Employee Relationship280 words

The employer-employee relationship has experienced tremendous shifts over the last few decades (Ulen, 2015). First and foremost, the operational environment has become more competitive than…

Consequences of the New Employment Relationship320 words

While such shifts in organizational strategy and policy may have improved profitability, they have considerably reformed the employer-employee relationship. Today, in an effort to optimize personnel costs, organizations increasingly prefer…

HRM Strategies for Redefining the Psychological Contract230 words

Though the merits and demerits of the traditional versus the new employer-employee relationship remain a highly debatable topic, it is imperative for organizations to adjust their psychological contracts to fit the changing operational environment. To achieve this, it is first important to understand what the…

Conclusion95 words

Overall, there is no doubt that the employer-employee relationship has been changing over the past four decades or so. Both employers and employees have contributed to the change in distinct…

View Full Document

References

Abu-Doleh, J., & Hammou, M. (2015). The impact of psychological contract breach on organizational outcomes: the moderating role of personal beliefs. Journal of Competitiveness Studies, 23(1&2), 34–54.

Cooper, C. (2002). The changing psychological contract. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59, 355.

Freese, C., Schalk, R., & Croon, M. (2011). The impact of organizational changes on psychological contracts: a longitudinal study. Personnel Review, 40(4), 404–422.

Ishaq, H., & Shamsher, Q. (2016). Effect of breach of psychological contracts on workplace deviant behaviors with the moderating role of revenge attitude and self-control. Pakistan Journal of Commerce & Social Sciences, 10(1), 69–83.

Maia, L., & Bastos, A. (2015). Organizational commitment, psychological contract fulfillment and job performance: a longitudinal quanti-qualitative study. Brazilian Administration Review, 12(3), 250–267.

McDermott, A., Conway, E., Rosseau, D., & Flood, P. (2013). Promoting effective psychological contracts through leadership: the missing link between strategy and performance. Human Resource Management, 52(2), 289–310.

Robinson, S., Kraatz, M., & Rosseau, D. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: a longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137–152.

Sims, R. (1994). Human resource management's role in clarifying the new psychological contract. Human Resource Management, 33(3), 373–382.

Smissen, S., Schalk, R., & Freese, C. (2013). Contemporary psychological contracts: how both employer and employee are changing the employment relationship. Management Revue, 24(4), 309–327.

Tomprou, M., Rosseau, D., & Hansen, S. (2015). The psychological contracts of violation victims: a post-violation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 561–581.

Ulen, T. (2015). Happiness, technology, and the changing employment relationship. Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal, 19, 61–83.

Wellin, M. (2007). Managing the psychological contract: using the personal deal to increase business performance. New York: Routledge.

Key Concepts in This Paper

Psychological Contract Employer-Employee Relationship HRM Strategy Transactional Relationship Job Security Organizational Change Work-Life Balance Contract Breach Employee Motivation Generational Workforce