Race, Law Enforcement, and Judeo-Christian Justice in America
This paper examines racial disparities within the American criminal justice system from a Judeo-Christian perspective. Drawing on Biblical foundations — particularly the concepts of divine law, human dignity, and moral responsibility — the paper argues that governmental law has consistently failed to uphold justice for Black Americans. It surveys Supreme Court rulings such as Taylor v. United States, the persistence of racial profiling, and the gap between anti-discrimination policy and lived reality. The paper contends that while God's law demands order, equity, and accountability, sinful behavior embedded in government institutions perpetuates systemic injustice, and that meaningful reform requires explicit acknowledgment of racial disparities at every level of law enforcement.
- Introduction: Two Forms of Law: Contrasts divine law and governmental law in America
- Race and Ethnicity in American Law Enforcement: Racial profiling and cultural bias in policing
- Biblical Foundations of Law and Justice: Genesis basis for order, rationality, and justice
- Supreme Court Rulings and Racial Disparities: Court decisions worsening Black incarceration rates
- Multiculturalism, Policy, and the Limits of Reform: Failed anti-discrimination efforts and persistent bias
- A Judeo-Christian Call for Accountability: Theological argument for governmental moral responsibility
- Conclusion: Diversity, injustice, and the need for awareness
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper establishes a distinctive analytical framework — the Judeo-Christian moral lens — and applies it consistently throughout, giving the argument coherence beyond a standard policy critique.
- It integrates peer-reviewed scholarship (Carter et al., Dupont, Schmalleger) alongside Biblical references, demonstrating the ability to synthesize sources from different domains.
- Concrete examples, including specific Supreme Court cases like Taylor v. United States and Brown v. Board of Education, ground abstract claims in legal reality.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates lens-based analysis: rather than simply cataloguing injustices, it filters observations through a defined theological-ethical framework. This technique forces the writer to interpret evidence rather than merely report it, producing a more argumentative and analytically rigorous paper.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by contrasting divine law and governmental law, then establishes the racial context of American criminal justice. It pivots to Biblical foundations to build its normative standard, surveys specific Supreme Court rulings as evidence of failure, assesses the limits of multicultural reform efforts, and closes with a Judeo-Christian call for personal and institutional accountability. The conclusion synthesizes both the empirical and theological threads.
Introduction: Two Forms of Law
From a Judeo-Christian perspective, there are two forms of law: the law of government and the law of God. Government plays a role in the daily lives of most people — from how to drive a car to what can be bought and sold. The government aims to protect the general public from domestic and foreign problems, though whether that means the wellbeing of all or the wellbeing of some is left to interpretation. According to Christianity, God passed down guidelines to help humanity flourish and grow. The Ten Commandments is just one of several instances in which humans witnessed the law of God. Yet in today's society, amidst a multicultural backdrop, the law of God has been overshadowed by the law of government — and the law of government is not one that instills good principles among the public, but rather seems to favor punishing those who do not fit the idea of "American."
Race and Ethnicity in American Law Enforcement
Race and ethnicity have been issues within America for centuries. From racial profiling to the disproportionate representation of Black Americans in the prison and court system, America has had to deal with recurring problems of race and ethnicity in law enforcement. As Schmalleger (2007) notes, "Race and ethnicity are only buzzwords that people use when they talk about multiculturalism. After all, neither race nor ethnicity determines a person's values, attitudes, or behavior. Just as there is no uniquely identifiable 'white culture' in American society" (p. 27). While there is likewise no uniquely identifiable "black culture" in American society, many law enforcement agencies continue to racially profile and attribute specific cultural traits to Black people, undermining the concept of a diverse and tolerant modern society.
References
Carter, P. L., Skiba, R., Arredondo, M. I., & Pollock, M. (2017). You can't fix what you don't look at. Urban Education, 52(2), 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916660350
Dupont, P. (2016). Human rights and substantive equality in the adjudication of ethnic practices. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 34(4), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2016.1243881
Pane, D. M., & Rocco, T. S. (2014). School-to-prison pipeline revisited: Looking to the future. In Transforming the school-to-prison pipeline (pp. 301–310). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-449-9_18
Schmalleger, F. (2007). Criminal justice today: An introductory text for the twenty-first century. Prentice Hall.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.