Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 1,151 words

Race, Urban Poverty, and Segregation: A Critical Review

~6 min read
Abstract

This paper summarizes and critiques a set of academic readings addressing the relationship between race and poverty in urban America. Drawing on works by Mincy, Massey, Wilson, Schiller, and Jargowsky and Sawhill, the paper examines de facto residential segregation, the decline of low-skilled employment in the post-industrial economy, cultural isolation, and the self-perpetuating nature of urban poverty. The critique challenges Jargowsky and Sawhill's relatively optimistic conclusions about poverty reduction, arguing that wage increases and welfare reform alone do not address structural barriers to employment. The paper concludes that lasting change requires education, community-driven activism, and broader access to support mechanisms.

Key Takeaways
  • Overview of the Readings: Introduces race, poverty, and urban segregation themes
  • Race, Segregation, and the Urban Underclass: Examines hypersegregation, vernacular speech, and color-blindness
  • The Post-Industrial Economy and Housing Policy: Links deindustrialization and housing policy to persistent poverty
  • Critique of Jargowsky and Sawhill's Optimism: Challenges wage-based evidence for poverty reduction claims
  • Education, Employment, and the Cycle of Poverty: Argues education access is key to breaking poverty cycle
  • Policy Limitations and the Path Forward: Calls for community-driven change alongside structural reform
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper synthesizes multiple competing scholarly perspectives — Mincy, Massey, Wilson, Schiller, and Jargowsky and Sawhill — and clearly maps where they agree and diverge, giving readers a coherent comparative framework.
  • The critique section goes beyond summary to take a clear argumentative stance, particularly in challenging Jargowsky and Sawhill's use of wage data as a proxy for employment participation.
  • The conclusion avoids policy oversimplification by acknowledging that structural reform alone is insufficient without community-level agency, which adds nuance rarely seen at this level.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates effective source-based argumentation: it uses citation not merely to report what authors say but to build a layered critique. For example, it marshals Massey's argument about "color neutrality" as institutionalized racism to directly undercut Wilson's policy recommendations, showing how sources can be positioned against one another to strengthen an original argument.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a multi-author summary organized thematically around race, segregation, and joblessness. It then pivots to a sustained critique, moving from Jargowsky and Sawhill's empirical claims, to welfare reform, to the role of education, and finally to a normative conclusion about policy and community agency. This two-part structure — summary then critique — is a reliable model for academic response papers.

Overview of the Readings

These readings examine the relationship between race and poverty, especially in urban settings characterized by de facto segregation. Mincy and others note the social reinforcement of certain poverty-perpetuating attitudes and behaviors in urban poor communities, which still have a predominantly African-American population (Mincy 1994; Massey 1990; Jargowsky & Sawhill 2006). Specifically, the jobless rate among males living in ethnically segregated urban areas is identified by these authors as a major contributing factor — if not the primary factor — in the continuation of poverty along dramatically racialized lines. Mincy (1994) also notes that this naturally results in higher rates of federal assistance and criminality as primary means of subsistence for these families. This state of affairs is self-perpetuating in the way it isolates members of such communities from mainstream society and provides inadequate role models for future generations, even going so far as to actively discourage traditional employment.

Race, Segregation, and the Urban Underclass

Other explanations for the "hypersegregation" of African-Americans in inner-city communities are offered by additional scholars, including either conscious or unconscious white avoidance of African-Americans and even outright racism (Massey 1990). This dynamic has contributed to the development of a Black English vernacular that has further contributed to joblessness and increased social and cultural isolation. This vernacular speech functions as another mechanism for reinforcing isolation from mainstream society and perpetuating cultural resistance to mainstream employment and broader social integration.

Massey goes on to argue that the prevailing official and unofficial "color-blindness" of cultural and socioeconomic policy is simply another form of institutionalized racism, insofar as it ignores the fact that urban poverty is predominantly a racial problem (Massey 1990). Ignoring the demonstrable negative correlation between employment levels and being African-American moves past politically correct naivety and into tacit approval of discriminatory hiring practices.

The Post-Industrial Economy and Housing Policy

Wilson (1996) examines how the phenomenon of de facto segregation is reproduced on both macro and micro levels of society, in turn trickling down to affect individual psychology and social outcomes in a perpetuation of the African-American and urban poor underclass. Wilson (1996) traces the development of this underclass to the transition into a post-industrial society, which brought about a dramatic decrease in the availability of low-skilled employment — a shift that had a hugely disproportionate effect on the African-American community. Federal low-income housing efforts have only exacerbated the social stigmas associated with leaving segregated urban poor neighborhoods.

Schiller (2008) partially disagrees with such assessments, arguing that external and peripheral forces bear more responsibility for the observed segregation than intracultural phenomena. Finally, Jargowsky and Sawhill (2006) present evidence suggesting that the underlying issues are not being perpetuated but are instead being effectively addressed through social and economic programs, leading to a reduction in the size of the underclass.

3 locked sections · 550 words
Sign up to read the full analysis
Critique of Jargowsky and Sawhill's Optimism200 words
It is quite clear from the data presented in these readings that race remains very much central to the issue of poverty, especially in urban settings. Furthermore, the self-perpetuation of such conditions — through forces such as…
Education, Employment, and the Cycle of Poverty195 words
Mincy (1994) also notes the low quality of schools in his evaluation of the issue, but this detail becomes lost among the many other social influences to which he attributes partial responsibility. Given that Mincy, Massey, Schiller, and even Wilson all emphasize the…
Policy Limitations and the Path Forward155 words
The idea that the destruction of a community will somehow lead to its betterment is beyond misleading; it is simply appalling. Though this is not the direct and explicit argument Jargowsky and…
Read the full paper →
Plus 130,000+ examples & all writing tools
Key Concepts in This Paper
Urban Poverty Racial Segregation De Facto Segregation Post-Industrial Economy Welfare Reform Hypersegregation Low-Income Housing Underclass Education Access Institutionalized Racism
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Race, Urban Poverty, and Segregation: A Critical Review. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/race-urban-poverty-segregation-critical-review-44

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.