This paper examines the systemic and institutionalized nature of racially biased police brutality in the United States. Drawing on data showing Black Americans are disproportionately killed by police, the paper explores how legal frameworks, organizational culture, and the absence of federal training standards perpetuate abuse. It addresses the "justifiable homicide" narrative, the criminalization of Black males in public discourse, and the failure of the justice system to provide adequate checks on law enforcement power. The paper concludes by proposing reforms including federal training standards, body cameras, community policing models, and cultural shifts toward accountability within law enforcement.
Police brutality against people of color has a long history in the United States. The Rodney King incident and the media attention it received promised to alter policy and public discourse, yet police brutality continues to be a problem and threatens to undermine civil rights in America. Police brutality against visible minorities also erodes public trust in the institution of the law and the system of law enforcement. Those effects are palpable not only at the community level but also at the individual level of perceptions of police. As one study shows, a substantial number of Americans have developed contempt for law enforcement, suspicion of law enforcement, or "perceive law enforcement as agents of brutality" (Chaney and Robertson 480). Community policing models cannot take root or hope to mitigate or reverse these effects unless there is a nationwide policy change to law enforcement organizational culture and training.
Fatalities at the hands of police have been estimated to be higher than they are for the general public, which should be a grave cause for concern (Chaney and Robertson 480). Also alarming is the fact that police killings of civilians are not tracked in any systematic way. The Department of Justice, the most natural agency to maintain such records, does not operate a federal database that would help researchers understand the extent of the problem and initiate public policy reform. The mere absence of any systematic tracking of police killings symbolizes the broader problem with police brutality in general and police brutality against minorities specifically: the police and other agents of law enforcement possess the power not only to kill but to avoid accountability for it. Law enforcement ensures that it protects its own people and its organizational culture at the expense of its professed role as protector of citizens.
Third-party organizations that research the problem of racial bias in police brutality cases do find statistically significant evidence that such a bias exists. "The probability of being Black, unarmed, and shot by police is about 3.49 times the probability of being white, unarmed, and shot by police on average" (Makarechi 1). Equally disturbing is the fact that when the same data set was analyzed in terms of crime rates, rates of police brutality did not correspond with rates of crime. In other words, "the racial bias observed in police shootings in this data set is not explainable as a response to local-level crime rates" (Makarechi 1). These findings make clear that racial disparities in police violence cannot be attributed to differences in criminal behavior, pointing instead to deeply embedded bias within law enforcement culture and practice.
In press releases and public statements by police, the killing of Black males specifically has been framed as "justifiable homicide" (Gilbert and Ray 122). This "justifiable homicide" trope has permeated public discourse as well, rendering it almost impossible to change the narrative and cast doubt upon the notion that these admitted homicides are actually justifiable. When police invoke "justifiable homicide" by claiming that officers felt threatened by an unarmed Black male, they give tacit approval for members of the general public to adopt the same logic. The Trayvon Martin case perfectly highlights the racialization of killing and the pretense of "justifiable homicide" in America. The killing of Black males as a whole is viewed as "justifiable" by the public and even in the eyes of the law.
The Martin case, as well as predecessor examples from Rodney King onward, is not just about law enforcement perpetrating crimes against citizens. The entire legal system is at fault for refusing to recognize in any meaningful way the gross injustices perpetrated by police or citizens against people of color. As Troutt puts it, the law is a "vague and malleable standard that privileges police justification and promotes narratives that render even the innocent justifiably dead" (18). The law weights police opinion heavily and permits conflicts of interest between police and prosecutors (Troutt). In fact, the law is codified to protect the police and to allow the "justifiable homicide" narrative to influence jury decisions. Police brutality, and the lack of concern about it within the justice system, further entrenches social injustice and foments racism throughout the United States.
"Systemic racism, media stigma, and cyclical inequality"
"Federal standards, training reform, and cultural change proposals"
"Body cameras, bias evidence, and reform recommendations"
You’re 39% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.