Racial Disparities in Juvenile Justice Mental Health Services
This paper critically reviews Lee et al.'s (2017) study on racial and ethnic disparities in mental health and substance abuse service utilization among youth in the juvenile justice system. The review summarizes the study's purpose, research design, variables, data collection instruments, and analytical methods, including chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA. It evaluates the strengths and limitations of the study, such as its cross-sectional design and geographically limited sample from Western Pennsylvania. The paper concludes with a personal reflection on systemic racial bias in juvenile justice and advocates for policy reforms that prioritize rehabilitation and equitable access to mental health services for youth of color.
- Purpose of the Study: Study goals, variables, and sample overview
- Research Design and Methodology: Instruments, data collection, and analytical methods
- Findings and Conclusions: Key results on racial disparities in treatment
- Limitations and Future Research Directions: Study constraints and recommendations for future work
- Reflection on Racial Bias in Juvenile Justice: Personal response to systemic racial inequity findings
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review clearly identifies and explains both the dependent and independent variables, demonstrating methodological literacy appropriate for the undergraduate level.
- The reflection section moves beyond summary to personal engagement, connecting the study's findings to broader systemic concerns about racial profiling and policy reform.
- The paper accurately evaluates research tools—such as the MAYSI-2—by noting their established credibility and replicability, showing critical appraisal of instrumentation.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates the technique of critical article review: the writer does not merely summarize the source study but evaluates its methodology, assesses the appropriateness of its analytical choices (chi-square and ANOVA), and identifies both strengths and limitations. This moves the writing beyond description into genuine academic critique.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into two main sections. The first provides a structured walkthrough of the Lee et al. (2017) study, covering purpose, literature context, variables, methodology, instruments, findings, and limitations in a logical sequence. The second section offers a personal reflection that interprets the study's implications for systemic racial equity and juvenile justice reform. The reference is properly formatted in APA style.
Purpose of the Study
The study examined racial and ethnic differences in the use of mental health and substance abuse services among youths placed in the juvenile justice system (Lee et al., 2017). The literature review provided information to support the need for the study, and the authors included other studies that focused on and demonstrated the need for additional research on the topic. All studies included are relevant to the current study and lay a good foundation for the research. Using the literature review, the authors demonstrated the need for further inquiry and identified the central problem.
The dependent variable was a measure of whether respondents had utilized mental health or substance abuse services in the 12 months before their arrest. The independent variable was the race and ethnicity of the respondents. All variables were clearly defined with an explanation of how they were used in the study. The study employed a cross-sectional design. The study subjects comprised 181 youths aged between 13 and 19 years who were residents of two juvenile facilities (Lee et al., 2017). One facility was for boys and the other for girls, making the participants representative of the population. However, the population under study was limited to Western Pennsylvania, which the authors acknowledged as a limitation. Consequently, the study results cannot be generalized to the broader population.
Research Design and Methodology
The authors used interviews and self-report mental health screening questions from the Massachusetts Youth Screening Inventory, Second Version (MAYSI-2). The interviews are adequately explained, and the MAYSI-2 is a well-known tool developed by Grisso and Barnum (Lee et al., 2017), meaning it can be understood by other researchers and replicated if necessary. The analytical methods used in the study were chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). One-way ANOVA allowed the researchers to compare scores across different racial groups and determine statistically significant differences.
Findings and Conclusions
The authors presented most of their findings using tables, making the results clearer for the reader. The study results were consistent with other studies analyzing racial and ethnic disparities, establishing that white youths were more likely to receive treatment before incarceration. There is an existing racial bias causing youth of color to experience greater involvement with the justice system than white youths. The data support the researchers' conclusions, and the authors recommended policy and practice changes based on their findings.
References
Lee, L. H., Goodkind, S., & Shook, J. J. (2017). Racial/ethnic disparities in prior mental health service use among incarcerated adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 78, 23–31.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.