Rhetorical Analysis of Rushkoff's "Social Media and Likes"
This paper presents a rhetorical analysis of Douglas Rushkoff's CNN article "Social Media and the Perils of Looking for Likes," examining how the author persuades his audience that teens' obsession with social media approval threatens their moral values. The analysis identifies Rushkoff's use of ethos through expert testimony, pathos through guilt and worry, and structural strategies including alternating points of view, rhetorical questions, hyperbole, and the pattern of three. The paper argues that Rushkoff skillfully balances both corporate and teenage perspectives before introducing his central critique, building credibility and emotional resonance to urge parents and the general public to better understand social media's cultural impact.
- Overview of Rushkoff's Argument: Summary of article's thesis and rhetorical strategies
- Alternating Points of View and Ethos: How shifting perspectives build credibility and balance
- Expert Testimony and Credibility: Teen experts reinforce moral and cultural claims
- Pathos and Inclusive Language: Inclusive language creates emotional connection with readers
- Emotional Appeals and Rhetorical Techniques: Rhetorical questions, hyperbole, and pattern of three
- Conclusion: Rushkoff's persuasive success on social media values
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves systematically through Rushkoff's rhetorical strategies — ethos, pathos, structural technique — giving each a dedicated analytical treatment rather than lumping them together.
- It grounds observations in specific textual evidence, quoting Rushkoff directly and explaining how each quoted passage serves a persuasive function.
- The analysis acknowledges Rushkoff's strategic choices (such as delaying his corporate critique until late in the article) and explains the reasoning behind them, showing genuine critical engagement with the source text.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models the "claim–evidence–analysis" structure at the sentence level throughout. Each rhetorical device is named, illustrated with a direct quotation or example from the article, and then explained in terms of its intended effect on the audience — a disciplined analytical habit that is central to rhetorical analysis writing at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a summary of Rushkoff's article and a thesis identifying his key rhetorical strategies. It then proceeds chronologically through those strategies: alternating perspective and ethos, expert testimony, inclusive language and pathos, and finally specific techniques (rhetorical questions, hyperbole, pattern of three). A brief conclusion restates the persuasive outcome. The structure mirrors the article's own progression, making the analysis easy to follow.
Overview of Rushkoff's Argument
Douglas Rushkoff's article Social Media and the Perils of Looking for Likes poignantly depicts the dangerous extent to which teens and young adults will go in order to win their friends' or peers' approval through "likes" and "favorites" on social media, with total disregard for the moral and ethical norms expected of them by society. Further, Rushkoff depicts how multi-million-dollar companies have turned this "like" and "favorite" dynamic into a money-making enterprise, and how they will do anything to reap financial gain — even if it means taking advantage of unsuspecting young people who are eager for sponsorships yet perhaps too young to fully understand what such exchanges entail.
The writer employs ethos (expert testimony) and pathos (guilt and worry) to create sensationalism and engage his audience, with the aim of manipulating their emotions (Wright). Through purposeful structure, alternating points of view, and deliberate word choice, he adds emotional depth to the idea that "living for likes" yields positive payoffs for sponsoring companies while gradually eroding the values and perspectives we have struggled to instill in our children. In doing so, he persuades his audience — the general American public — that there is a need to understand exactly what social media is doing to our culture, our perspectives, and our values, because only then can we identify the negatives and address them, even as we embrace the positives.
Works Cited
Rushkoff, Douglas. "Social Media and the Perils of Looking for Likes." CNN, 2014. Web. 8 October 2014.
Wright, David. "The Rhetorical Library and Three Rhetorical Appeals." University of Richmond, n.d. Web. 8 October 2014.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.