Six Conditions for Reducing Prejudice Through Contact
This paper examines six conditions identified in social psychology research as necessary for reducing or eliminating prejudice: mutual interdependence, a common goal, equal status, informal interpersonal contact, multiple contacts, and social norms of equality. Drawing on work by Fiske (2000), Pettigrew and Tropp (2000), and Robinson and Preston (1976), the paper argues that effective prejudice-reduction programs must address these conditions on both administrative and personal levels. It contends that top-down institutional mandates alone are insufficient, and that genuine informal contact and emotional engagement across group lines are equally essential for fostering lasting intergroup equality.
- Introduction: The Six Conditions for Reducing Prejudice: Introduces six research-supported conditions for prejudice reduction
- The Limits of Mandated Contact and the Role of Informal Interaction: Argues mandated contact alone cannot reduce prejudice
- Multi-Level Program Design for Prejudice Reduction: Describes administrative and personal program approaches
- Top-Down and Bottom-Up Implementation: Combines institutional policy with personal engagement
- Conclusion: Calls for collective commitment to egalitarian society
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Integrates multiple peer-reviewed sources to build a layered, evidence-based argument rather than relying on a single authority.
- Moves logically from identifying the six conditions to analyzing their limitations and then proposing a practical multi-level solution.
- Balances theoretical framing with applied, organizational implications, making the argument relevant to real-world program design.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses the synthesis technique: rather than summarizing each source in isolation, it weaves Fiske, Pettigrew and Tropp, and Robinson and Preston together to build a single, cohesive argument. Each citation is deployed to either support or qualify a specific claim, demonstrating how to use literature as evidence within an analytical framework rather than as decoration.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by introducing and briefly explaining all six conditions, then progressively complicates the picture by showing why any single condition is insufficient. The middle sections propose a dual-track (top-down and bottom-up) program model. The conclusion synthesizes the argument by emphasizing collective commitment to egalitarianism. The structure is tight and cumulative, with each paragraph building on the one before it.
Introduction: The Six Conditions for Reducing Prejudice
Prejudice can be reduced through six different conditions: mutual interdependence, a common goal, equal status, informal interpersonal contact, multiple contacts, and social norms of equality. Research substantiates the importance of each of these six conditions for reducing or eliminating prejudice. Ideally, all six conditions will be in place to ensure that prejudice is reduced. Moreover, applying these six conditions can help organizations perform better and achieve tangible goals. For example, Fiske (2000) found that "building on interdependence was essential for successful intergroup contact" (p. 115). Programs designed to reduce or eliminate prejudice need to focus on at least two, if not more, of these conditions.
Interdependence is linked to the achievement of common goals, another key condition for reducing prejudice. When an organization actively pursues and enforces policies that ensure equal status for all employees or members, it creates a normative environment that does not support prejudice. However, formal methods of reducing prejudice — such as mandating equal status — may not be sufficient on their own. Research also shows that informal interpersonal contact is important for reducing prejudice. A program that reduces prejudice should ideally focus on both informal and immediate interpersonal contact and on generating social norms of equality.
The Limits of Mandated Contact and the Role of Informal Interaction
Contact between different groups is itself insufficient for reducing prejudice. "Research on equal-status interracial contact suggests that such contact lessens prejudice," but not simply when an institution or organization mandates contact (Robinson & Preston, 1976, p. 911). Prejudicial attitudes and beliefs are often perpetuated when equal status is embedded in rules or laws but is not necessarily experienced in practice. Therefore, a program that also encourages informal interpersonal contact will be necessary.
Schools and workplace organizations can work to implement programs that create team-based activities encouraging interpersonal contact and multiple contacts, while also helping individuals identify a common goal they can pursue together. The importance of common goals and interdependence cannot be underestimated: when individual members of a team recognize that they need one another to achieve a shared goal, their stereotypes, biases, and prejudices tend to fade. Yet as Pettigrew and Tropp (2000) point out, it is not only common goals and mutual interdependence, but also equal status and continual contact, that are necessary for reducing prejudice.
Multi-Level Program Design for Prejudice Reduction
A program that reduces prejudice operates on multiple levels to achieve all six of the necessary conditions. Such a program is both administrative and personal, with top-down mandates to reduce prejudice through the creation of common goals and the enforcement of non-discrimination norms. The program also needs to work from the bottom up, requiring each person to take personal responsibility for creating a safe and supportive environment in which all people enjoy equal status and engage in frequent informal interpersonal contact with multiple individuals.
Just having one friend from a different background is not enough; multiple contacts are needed to ensure that social norms of equality are maintained over time. With sufficient ground-up methods for reducing prejudice, it is possible to create a culture that does not tolerate discrimination. Prejudice is much more than a cognitive issue, which is why frequent emotional connectivity with people from different backgrounds or social statuses is helpful in reducing it (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2000).
Conclusion
Working together diligently to dispel stereotypes and biases, people from multiple backgrounds can commit to creating an egalitarian society.
References
Fiske, S. T. (2000). Interdependence and the reduction of prejudice. In Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination. Psychology Press.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? In Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination. Psychology Press.
Robinson, J. W., & Preston, J. D. (1976). Equal-status contact and modification of racial prejudice: A reexamination of the contact hypothesis. Social Forces, 54(4), 911–924.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.