Strategic HRM Analysis: Australian Cladding Company Case
This paper analyzes the human resource management challenges facing the Australian Cladding Company (ACC), a rapidly growing Sydney-based manufacturer founded in 1998. Using established HRM frameworks — including the resource-based view of the firm, behavioral perspectives, cybernetic systems models, and best-practices approaches — the paper identifies both immediate and underlying workforce problems caused by ACC's rapid expansion. Key issues include inadequate HR planning, high staff turnover, absence of career development pathways, workplace safety violations, and allegations of sexual harassment. The paper recommends short- and long-term Strategic HRM (SHRM) interventions, including internal promotion policies, structured training programs, employee participation, and competence management strategies, to restore organizational performance and competitive advantage.
- Introduction: ACC's Growth and HR Challenges: ACC's rapid growth exposes critical HR failures
- Strategic HRM: Theory and Competitive Advantage: Seven SHRM practices linked to firm performance
- Best Practices in Strategic HRM: Universalistic best-practices approach to workforce management
- Research Approaches to HRM: Contingency and configurational HRM research perspectives
- Theoretical Models of HRM Practice: Cybernetic, behavioral, and competence management models
- Analysis of ACC's HR Problems: Applying SHRM theory to ACC's specific workforce issues
- Short- and Long-Term SHRM Recommendations: Practical HRM interventions for ACC's recovery
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Anchors its recommendations in a clearly established theoretical foundation, drawing on multiple named HRM frameworks before applying them to the case.
- Uses the ACC case as a consistent reference point throughout, connecting each theoretical section back to the company's specific problems (turnover, safety, harassment, lack of career paths).
- Organizes content logically from problem identification → theory review → analysis → recommendations, giving the paper a readable consultancy-report structure.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical synthesis: it surveys multiple HRM frameworks (resource-based view, behavioral perspective, cybernetic systems, universalistic best practices) and selects elements from each to justify a concrete set of recommendations. This moves beyond mere description of theory to purposeful application, which is a hallmark of graduate-level business case analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief company background and problem statement, then devotes three sections to building a theoretical foundation (SHRM theory, best practices, and research approaches). A further section outlines specific theoretical models and competence management strategies. The final two sections apply this foundation directly to ACC, diagnosing root causes and proposing both immediate and longer-term HR interventions. The bibliography is extensive and drawn from recognized HRM scholarship.
Introduction: ACC's Growth and HR Challenges
This paper examines the immediate and underlying problems facing the Australian Cladding Company (ACC) and identifies the HR activities that need to be implemented quickly, as well as the longer-term HR approaches required to ensure ongoing strategic competitive advantage. The analysis draws on theories relating to the evolution of HRM, Strategic HRM (SHRM), HR planning, retention and turnover, job analysis and design, and recruitment and selection.
The Australian Cladding Company was founded by Jim Hackett in 1998. Hackett has a background in engineering and is the creator of a lightweight, low-cost house cladding product that quickly found a ready market in Australia. The company grew rapidly, with its Sydney headquarters supplying cladding across multiple Australian states and attracting international customers. Growth was further supported by government construction initiatives. ACC became involved in the supply and installation of its product on large construction projects in Western Australia.
Hackett initially staffed the company with a small team: Hackett himself as managing director, Ben Harper in engineering and design, Reg Grundy in marketing and sales, Arthur Seymour as financial controller, Clark as production manager, and Jill Hackett heading personnel, wages, salary administration, and personnel management. The company began with 20 employees and grew to a production staff of 150, plus 25 additional staff in logistics, engineering, personnel, sales, and accounting and finance.
The company's profitability declined during 2007 and into 2008, due to rising material and labor costs. Efficiency problems emerged on the production floor, including excessive downtime and stress-related issues from periods of intense work. The company experienced difficulty retaining skilled staff, particularly in engineering and IT. Workplace accidents increased, with workers failing to observe safety procedures around machinery. Additionally, some female workers reported instances of alleged sexual harassment.
In mid-2008, Hackett hired a consultant to address declining performance and staff-related problems. The consultant concluded that most of the problems were linked to the company's very rapid growth and its failure to develop human resource management practices that kept pace with its expansion. The company had not planned its workforce around peak demand periods, and its workforce had changed considerably from the earlier composition of predominantly male tradesmen. Skilled workers reported insufficient professional development, and all senior positions remained occupied by the original management group, leaving other employees unable to identify a clear career path within the company. It was evident that ACC needed to address the strategic management of its workforce.
Strategic HRM: Theory and Competitive Advantage
Akhtar, Ding, and Ge (2008) report that researchers have argued human resources can be viewed as a sustained competitive advantage for organizations. The underlying assumption is that human resources are unique to the extent that competitors cannot imitate them. This reasoning has led to the identification of a number of human resource management practices that contribute to company performance across different organizations (p. 15).
Akhtar, Ding, and Ge (2008) further note that seven practices have been identified as consistent with strategic HRM principles — those that are theoretically or empirically related to overall organizational performance. The seven practices are:
(1) Internal career opportunities; (2) Formal training systems; (3) Results-oriented appraisals; (4) Employment security; (5) Participation; (6) Job descriptions; and (7) Profit sharing. (Akhtar, Ding, and Ge, 2008, p. 16)
Thite and Kavanagh (n.d.) report that firms recognize that "innovative and creative employees who hold the key to organizational knowledge provide a sustainable competitive advantage because unlike other resources, intellectual capital is difficult to imitate by competitors" (p. 10). People management has become an important function within organizational strategy. As a result, the HR scorecard has been developed (Becker, Huselid, & Ulrich, 2001; Huselid, Becker, & Beatty, 2005), and there is increasing emphasis on the return on investment of the HR function and HR programs (Cascio, 2000; Fitz-Enz, 2000, 2002, as cited in Thite & Kavanagh, n.d.).
Typical HR programs include record keeping, recruiting, selection, training, employee relations, and compensation. All of these programs involve multiple activities that can be classified into three broad categories: transactional, traditional, and transformational (Wright, McMahan, Snell, & Gerhart, 1998, as cited in Thite & Kavanagh, n.d., p. 11). It is reported that costs and cycle times can be reduced through IT-driven automation and work process redesign, and that these improvements also serve to enhance quality. Management information systems assist in decision-making and strategic implementation. Information technology is a tool and is often mistaken as the message rather than the medium (Thite, 2004). The critical success factors in information systems project implementation are described as nontechnical, relating more to social and managerial issues (Martinsons & Chong, 1999). As information technologies are increasingly used in HR planning and delivery, "the way people in organizations look at the nature and role of HR itself may change" (Roehling et al., 2005, as cited in Thite & Kavanagh, n.d.).
Best Practices in Strategic HRM
The approach described above has become known as the "best practices or universalistic approach" (Akhtar, Ding, and Ge, 2008, p. 16). Within this framework, the first practice — internal career opportunities — refers to the organizational preference for hiring primarily from within. Training systems refers to whether organizations provide extensive training opportunities for their employees or whether they depend on selection and socialization processes to obtain required skills (Akhtar, Ding, and Ge, 2008, p. 16).
Appraisals are conceptualized in terms of outcome-based performance ratings and the extent to which subordinate views are taken into account in those ratings (Akhtar, Ding, and Ge, 2008, p. 16). Employment security reflects the degree to which employees feel secure about continued employment. Although formalized employment security is generally on the decline, organizations may maintain either an implicit or explicit policy in this area (Akhtar, Ding, and Ge, 2008, p. 16).
Employee participation — in terms of taking part in decision-making and having opportunities to communicate suggestions for improvement — has emerged as a strategic HRM practice (Akhtar, Ding, and Ge, 2008, p. 16). Job description refers to the extent to which jobs are tightly and clearly defined so that employees know what is expected of them (p. 16). Profit sharing is reflective of the concern for overall organizational performance on a sustainable basis (p. 16).
References
Akhtar, S., Ding, D. Z., & Ge, G. L. (2008). Strategic HRM practices and their impact on company performance in Chinese enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 47(1), 15–26.
Appleby, A., & Mavin, S. (2000). Innovation not imitation: Human resource strategy and the impact on world-class status. Total Quality Management, 11(5), s554–s561.
Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy, and performance. Harvard Business School Press.
Beckers, A. M., & Bsat, M. Z. (2002). A DSS classification model for research in human resource information systems. Information Systems Management, 19(3), 41–50.
Cascio, W. F. (1984). Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations. PWS-Kent.
Cascio, W. F. (1991). Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations (3rd ed.). PWS-Kent.
Cascio, W. F. (2000). Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations (4th ed.). South-Western College.
Defining SHRM. (2006). Retrieved from itchybrainscentral.com.
Fitz-Enz, J. (1980). Quantifying the human resources function. Personnel, 57(3), 41–52.
Fitz-Enz, J. (2000). The ROI of human capital: Measuring the economic value of employee performance. AMACOM/American Management Association.
Fitz-Enz, J. (2002). How to measure human resource management (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Huselid, M. A., Becker, B. E., & Beatty, R. W. (2005). The workforce scorecard: Managing human capital to execute strategy. Harvard Business School Press.
Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 171–188.
Kavanagh, M. J., Gueutal, H. G., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1990). Human resource information systems. PWS-Kent.
Martinsons, M. G., & Chong, P. K. C. (1999). The influence of human factors and specialist involvement on information systems success. Human Relations, 52(1), 123–152.
Mueller, F. (1996). Human resources as strategic assets: An evolutionary resource-based theory. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 757–785.
Roehling, M. V., Boswell, W. R., Caligiuri, P., Feldman, D., Graham, M. E., Guthrie, J. P., et al. (2005). The future of HR management: Research needs and directions. Human Resource Management, 44(2), 207–216.
Thite, M. (2004). Managing people in the new economy. Sage.
Thite, M., & Kavanagh, M. J. (n.d.). Evolution of human resource management and human resource information systems: The role of information technology. Retrieved from sagepub.com.
Van Donk, D., & Esser, A. (1992). Strategic human resource management: A role of the human resource manager in the process of strategy formation. Human Resource Management Review, 2(4), 299–315.
Wright, P., McMahan, G., Snell, S., & Gerhart, B. (1998). Strategic human resource management: Building human capital and organizational capacity (Technical report). Cornell University.
Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1993). Strategic human resource management: Alternative theoretical frameworks. University of Southern California.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.