Terrorism, Media, and Behavioral Science: Two Article Analysis
This paper examines how terrorism-related events influence individual behavior by analyzing two articles: one from Psychology Today and one from The Miami Herald. Drawing on behavioral science concepts, the paper considers how threatening media imagery and words can produce fear and hostility in audiences. The Psychology Today article references a Journal of Politics study using survey and experimental data to explore how images of the 9/11 attacks and London subway bombings negatively affect viewers. The Miami Herald article uses qualitative interviews to document fear among Muslim students and community officials in response to a church's plan to burn the Quran. Together, the articles illustrate how negative media stimuli shape both individual and collective behavior.
- Introduction to Behavioral Science and Terrorism: Behavioral science framework linking stimuli to behavior
- Psychology Today Article: Media, Terror, and Political Behavior: Media imagery of terror attacks shapes political attitudes
- The Miami Herald Article: Community Fear and Religious Backlash: Quran-burning plan fuels community fear and backlash
- Conclusions: How Terrorism Shapes Individual Behavior: Negative media stimuli drive fear and intergroup hostility
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its analysis in a clear behavioral science framework, using the concept of environmental stimuli to explain how media coverage of terrorism shapes individual reactions.
- It compares two distinct but thematically connected sources — an academic-leaning magazine article and a local news report — giving the analysis breadth across different types of journalism.
- The paper evaluates each source critically, noting limitations such as the lack of corroborating studies, which shows analytical thinking beyond mere summary.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative source analysis: it examines each article through a consistent set of lenses (research question, methodology, data acquisition, conclusions, and limitations) before synthesizing both into a unified argument. This structured approach allows readers to evaluate the quality and completeness of evidence across different source types.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief theoretical introduction to behavioral science and stimuli. It then devotes one body paragraph to each article, applying the same evaluative framework to both. A concluding paragraph synthesizes the findings, connecting media-driven negative imagery to real-world intergroup hostility. The bibliography follows MLA format. The structure is straightforward and well-suited to a short comparative analysis assignment at the undergraduate introductory level.
Introduction to Behavioral Science and Terrorism
The study of psychology often involves observing the reactions that people have to various events. In scientific terms, these triggers are referred to as environmental stimuli — different events that shape how someone responds to a particular situation. In some cases, these reactions (behaviors) can be positive or negative, depending on how the individual interprets the underlying stimuli (Robbins 78–97). To fully understand the impact of these different events, this paper examines two news-related articles exploring how terrorism shapes the behavior of various individuals. The articles are drawn from Psychology Today and The Miami Herald, with emphasis on each article's research question, method of data acquisition, and the conclusions that can be drawn. Together, these elements provide insight into how terrorism-related events influence individual behavior.
Psychology Today Article: Media, Terror, and Political Behavior
The article in Psychology Today discusses how political events are often polarizing, as the news media tends to highlight negative facts and incidents. The constant exposure to destructive images and words shapes individual opinions in a negative direction. To corroborate these effects, the author cites a research study published in the Journal of Politics. During that project, researchers used survey and experimental data to understand the impact that media coverage has on political views. Participants were shown images of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the London subway bombings. The results indicated that when threatening images and words are used together, they can have a measurably negative impact on individual behavior.
In this article, the author employs qualitative methods of analysis to draw broader conclusions from specific information. This approach helps identify the precise factors through which terrorism affects individual behavior — namely, that the constant sight of negative images and language causes people to become fearful and angry. The article concludes that when the news media discusses negative events, audiences should recognize that stories may be framed to maximize emotional impact. To make the analysis more complete, the author could have corroborated his findings with additional studies or conducted original research (Alvarez).
Bibliography
"What is Qualitative Research." QSR International. 2007. Web. 7 Sept. 2010. <http://www.qsrinternational.com/what-is-qualitative-research.aspx>
Alvarez, Michael. "The Psychology Behind Political Debate." Psychology Today. 13 Jun. 2010. Web. 7 Sept. 2010.
Kaleem, Jaweed. "UF Muslims Fear Koran Burning." The Miami Herald. 7 Sept. 2010. Web. 7 Sept. 2010.
Robbins, Anthony. "The Power of State." Unlimited Power: A Black Choice. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 1997. 78–97. Print.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.