United Airlines Customer Service: VUCA Framework Analysis
This paper examines United Airlines' recurring customer service failures — most notably the April 2017 incident in which a passenger was forcibly removed from an overbooked flight — and applies two structured frameworks to develop evidence-based recommendations. Using Michael Kallet's critical thinking model (clarity, conclusions, and decisions) alongside the VUCA framework (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity), the paper argues that United Airlines must adopt the IDIC customer-centric approach (identify, differentiate, interact, and customize) and eliminate overbooking practices. The analysis further explores how each VUCA component shapes the implementation challenges of these recommendations, emphasizing that clear internal communication and a culture shift are essential to restoring customer trust and competitive standing.
- Introduction: United Airlines and Its Customer Service Crisis: Overview of United Airlines' customer service failures
- The 2017 Dragging Incident and Its Fallout: Passenger removed from overbooked flight, airline backlash
- Thinking Critically: Kallet's Framework Applied: IDIC model and three-step critical thinking recommendations
- Applying the VUCA Framework: VUCA components shape implementation of recommendations
- Conclusion: Urgency of culture shift and IDIC adoption
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly grounds its recommendations in two named academic/professional frameworks — Kallet's critical thinking model and VUCA — giving the analysis a structured, systematic feel rather than relying on opinion alone.
- It moves logically from problem description to analytical framework to practical recommendation, maintaining a consistent argumentative thread throughout.
- The use of a specific, high-profile case study (the April 2017 passenger removal) gives the abstract frameworks concrete grounding and makes the analysis more persuasive.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates framework-driven analysis: rather than listing problems and solutions loosely, it maps each recommendation onto a component of an established model (VUCA's V, U, C, A). This technique signals academic rigor and allows the writer to address multiple dimensions of a business problem in an organized, traceable way — a useful skill in management coursework and case analysis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction identifying United Airlines' customer service problem and the frameworks to be applied. A dedicated section details the specific incidents, with the 2017 dragging case as the anchor example. The critical thinking section applies Kallet's three-step model (clarity, conclusions, decisions) to generate actionable recommendations. The VUCA section then stress-tests those recommendations against each environmental factor. A concise conclusion ties the frameworks together and reaffirms the urgency of the recommended changes.
Introduction: United Airlines and Its Customer Service Crisis
United Airlines has long been one of the most prominent names in the airline industry, operating both domestic and international flights. However, it has recently found itself in serious difficulty due to several high-profile customer service failures that have cost the company billions of dollars and significantly damaged its reputation. This paper applies the VUCA framework (volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity) to United Airlines' customer service problem and uses Michael Kallet's critical thinking model to develop evidence-based recommendations for improvement.
The 2017 Dragging Incident and Its Fallout
United Airlines has accumulated a troubling record of customer service failures, including the deaths of pets in its care, refusals to allow passengers with certain dog breeds to board, damaged luggage — most famously a broken guitar — forcible removal of paying customers, poor responsiveness on phone and social media, and reports of inedible in-flight meals (Nomadic Matt, 2019). These incidents have driven customers to seek alternative carriers, a damaging outcome for an industry in which service quality is the primary competitive differentiator.
The most widely publicized incident occurred in April 2017 on a United Airlines flight scheduled to travel from Chicago to Louisville. The airline had overbooked the flight and needed passengers to voluntarily give up their seats, offering compensation in exchange. When no passenger agreed to the terms, the airline's system randomly selected four customers to be removed. One of the four refused to leave, and security personnel physically dragged him off the aircraft (Shaun Belding, n.d.).
The company compounded the crisis when its initial public response — characterizing the passenger as "disruptive and belligerent" — triggered an even greater social media backlash (Matousek, 2018). The passenger subsequently filed a lawsuit, having sustained injuries during the removal, and United Airlines was eventually forced to reach a financial settlement. The episode inflicted severe and lasting damage on the airline's public image.
Thinking Critically: Kallet's Framework Applied
The critical thinking framework outlined by Michael Kallet includes three core components: clarity, conclusions, and decisions (Kallet, 2014, p. 16). Applying this framework to United Airlines yields a structured, evidence-based path toward meaningful customer service reform.
Under the clarity component, United Airlines needs to offer its passengers a consistently positive experience by adopting the IDIC model (TTec, n.d.). IDIC stands for identify, differentiate, interact, and customize, and it provides a practical foundation for building a customer-centric culture. Concretely, the airline must treat customers as valued individuals, recognize their differing needs and behavioral profiles, engage them through clear and responsive communication, address complaints promptly, and tailor its service offerings where feasible. In the context of the 2017 overbooking incident, applying IDIC-style thinking could have led the airline to explore creative alternatives — such as arranging private transportation for the overbooked passengers — rather than resorting to forced removal (Shaun Belding, n.d.). While chartering an alternative flight would have involved short-term costs, it would have preserved the airline's reputation and avoided the far greater long-term financial and reputational losses that followed the social media firestorm.
The conclusions component of Kallet's framework refers to the specific solutions and actions required to achieve improvement. Most fundamentally, United Airlines should eliminate the practice of overbooking flights so that passenger removal is never even considered as an option. Had overbooking not occurred in April 2017, the entire crisis would have been avoided, along with the $800 compensation offers and the eventual legal settlement. Ending overbooking is therefore the most direct structural intervention available to the airline.
The decisions component addresses timing and commitment. The appropriate moment to begin implementing the action plan is immediately. United Airlines has already absorbed substantial financial losses and endured serious reputational damage. Strengthening and making transparent its communications with customers is the most effective way to signal that the company is committed to change. Social media, the same channel through which outrage spread so rapidly, can serve as a powerful platform for the airline to publicize its reform efforts and demonstrate its renewed commitment to service excellence.
Conclusion
United Airlines' customer service problems need to be addressed promptly so that further harm to its image is prevented. Serving its customers with respect should be its primary concern, and that commitment must be aligned with its policies and procedures for long-term success. To become a genuinely customer-focused airline, the company must implement the IDIC framework and carefully account for each dimension of the VUCA framework during implementation. Communication is integral to the entire process, as it is the primary mechanism for managing the unpredictable and ambiguous factors that inevitably accompany organizational change. This culture shift is expected to produce lasting improvements in customer service, strengthen the airline's competitive position, and help it earn back the trust it has lost. Immediate action is both appropriate and necessary given the scale of the damage already done.
References
Kallet, M. (2014). Think smarter: Critical thinking to improve problem-solving and decision-making skills. John Wiley & Sons.
Matousek, M. (2018, March 16). United Airlines has a long history of infuriating customers — here are its worst customer service incidents. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/united-airlines-worst-customer-service-incidents-2018-3
Nomadic Matt. (2019, August 5). 16 reasons why flying United Airlines sucks. https://www.nomadicmatt.com/travel-blogs/15-reasons-why-flying-united-airlines-sucks/
Shaun Belding. (n.d.). United Airlines appears to be committed to bad customer experience. https://shaunbelding.com/united-airlines-customer-experience-gets-worse/
TTec. (n.d.). The 4 steps to becoming a customer-centric airline.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.