Urban Homelessness and Community-Based Participatory Research
This paper examines urban homelessness in the United States, focusing on its geographic distribution, temporal changes, and concentration at the neighborhood level. It reviews ethnographic literature on the socio-spatial dimensions of homelessness and connects these insights to community engagement strategies. Drawing on community-based participatory research (CBPR), the paper discusses three practical tools — community advisory boards (CABs), participatory research methodologies, and story circles — as mechanisms for involving affected populations in identifying solutions. The paper also addresses the challenges and limitations of conducting research with disadvantaged populations, including social instability, ethical considerations, and issues of generalizability.
- Introduction: Scale, geography, and context of U.S. homelessness
- Community Engagement Activity and Research Challenges: Barriers to CBPR with disadvantaged populations
- Community Advisory Boards in CBPR: Role and structure of community advisory boards
- Story Circles as a Participatory Tool: Using shared stories to surface homeless experiences
- Impact of Participatory Approaches: Benefits, limitations, and evaluation of CBPR methods
- Conclusion and Implications: Collaborative solutions and future research directions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds abstract policy discussion in concrete methodological tools — CABs, CBPR, and story circles — giving the paper practical relevance beyond theory.
- The paper draws on a diverse range of sources, from HUD reports and urban geography studies to ethnographic and participatory research literature, demonstrating breadth of engagement with the topic.
- It honestly acknowledges the limitations of participatory approaches, such as underrepresentation and lack of generalizability, which strengthens its credibility as an academic argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively synthesizes literature across multiple disciplines — urban studies, public health, and social research — to build a multi-layered argument. By moving from macro-level geographic data (HUD statistics, city-level trends) to micro-level community engagement strategies, the paper demonstrates scalar analysis: showing how a large social problem is best understood and addressed at the neighborhood and community level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with national statistics on homelessness and a review of geographic and ethnographic research. It then transitions to community engagement methods, first explaining CBPR challenges, then detailing CABs and story circles. An "Impact" section revisits each method to assess its effectiveness. This mirrors a problem–method–evaluation structure common in applied social science writing, making the argument easy to follow from problem identification through proposed solutions.
Introduction
Homelessness in urban areas, particularly among children, is a significant issue facing major U.S. cities. As reported in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Annual Homeless Assessment Report (2020), approximately 570,000 people experienced homelessness on a single night in January 2019 in the United States. Furthermore, homelessness has recently increased nationwide, although the temporal changes in homeless rates exhibit considerable sub-national variation. For example, while homelessness has increased dramatically in cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco — known for their long-standing high rates of homelessness — cities such as Chicago have seen a general decrease in homelessness during the same period (Knowles, 2019).
Research has extensively investigated the geography of homelessness. Still, most studies have examined the distribution of homeless populations at a broad geographic level due to limited finer-grained spatial data on the locations of homeless populations (Parkinson et al., 2019). Homelessness is a spatially concentrated phenomenon within a city or metropolitan area, but our understanding of the factors determining this pattern remains limited. Additionally, little is known about the temporal changes in homelessness patterns at a finer geographic level, particularly at the neighborhood level. Given the potential social, economic, and public health effects of homelessness on neighborhoods, understanding where homeless populations grow or decline — and the factors influencing these changes — is essential. This knowledge is critical for informing policy decisions on providing supportive services and implementing homelessness prevention programs (Shin, 2021).
Urban homelessness has long served as an indicator of the prevailing socio-spatial order and its changes. Rising homelessness has accompanied industrialization, urban revitalization, and economic crises. Ethnographic accounts of the everyday lives of homeless people have depicted the socio-spatial mechanisms of societal transformation and their effects on urban life, particularly in Western metropolises, where homelessness was first studied at the beginning of the twentieth century. Since then, ethnographic research has explored homeless people's strategies for coping with a disadvantaging socio-spatial order, as well as the impacts of urban renewal and deindustrialization. In recent decades, ethnographic studies have highlighted the imprints of neoliberal policies on urban landscapes, public space politics, and patterns of displacement and resistance from the perspective of homeless people (Clarke & Parsell, 2019).
Ethnographic research has also revealed various ways and tools of homemaking, informal citizenship, and other forms of political agency related to housing precarity (McCarthy, 2020). Homelessness is a symptom of global and systemic changes (Giles, 2017, p. 332), with different stories from various cities interrelated and affected by the same shifts in the global economy. However, the geographical scope of places from which academic knowledge about homelessness has emerged remains relatively limited. Cities in the Global North and the West are mostly covered, with testimonials from American cities often serving as a reference for conceptualizing homelessness and the policies that address it in different contexts (Ferenčuhová & Vašát, 2021).
References
Campbell, D. J. T., Campbell, R. B., DiGiandomenico, A., & et al. (2021). Using a community-based participatory research approach to meaningfully engage those with lived experience of diabetes and homelessness. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care, 9(1), e002154.
Clarke, A., & Parsell, C. (2019). The potential for urban surveillance to help support people who are homeless: Evidence from Cairns, Australia. Urban Studies, 56(10), 1951–1967.
Ferenčuhová, S., & Vašát, P. (2021). Ethnographies of urban change: Introducing homelessness and the post-socialist city. Urban Geography, 42(9), 1217–1229.
Giles, D. B. (2017). Neutralizing homelessness, 2015: The story to date. Urban Geography, 38(3), 332–340.
Hamada, R. (2020, January 10). Taking a story full circle: Reporting with people, not on them. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/blog/2020-01-10/taking-a-story-full-circle
Knowles, H. (2019, December 21). Homelessness in the U.S. rose for a third year, driven by a surge in California, HUD says. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/12/21/homelessness-us-rose-thirdyear-driven-by-surge-california-hud-says/
McCarthy, L. (2020). Homeless women, material objects, and home (un)making. Housing Studies, 35(7), 1309–1333.
Newman, S. D., Andrews, J. O., Magwood, G. S., Jenkins, C., Cox, M. J., & Williamson, D. C. (2011). Peer reviewed: Community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: A synthesis of best processes. Preventing Chronic Disease, 8(3).
Parkinson, S., Batterham, D., Reynolds, M., & Wood, G. A. (2019). The changing geography of homelessness: A spatial analysis from 2001 to 2016. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
Shin, E. J. (2021). Neighborhood distribution of unsheltered homelessness and its temporal changes: Evidence from Los Angeles. Urban Affairs Review, 57(2), 541–576.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2020). The 2019 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/2019-AHAR-Part-1.pdf
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.