This paper explores the relationship between urbanization, globalization, and wage inequality in Turkey, with particular focus on developments since the 1980s. The author argues that while economic growth and urban development have produced clear winners, large segments of the population have experienced wage stagnation and increasing poverty that does not keep pace with broader economic advancement. The paper analyzes contributing factors including public/private sector disparities, uneven market potential, and political dynamics in which government favoritism and entrepreneurial state intervention marginalize vulnerable populations and suppress their ability to advocate for fair wages. The conclusion reflects on Turkey's mixed record in mitigating the negative consequences of rapid urbanization.
When weighing the concerns of rural areas against those of urban areas, there are certainly pros and cons on both sides. Turkey is a country that fits squarely in this debate. While many people tout the improvements and advancements that come with urbanization and development, there are clear tradeoffs. One such tradeoff is the effect on wages. In many instances, wages stagnate or decline in real terms as an area becomes more urban. In other words, as populations shift and gross domestic product grows, there is a dragging effect on wages — people earn less than they arguably should, given the advancements and changes otherwise occurring around them. Put another way, wages in rapidly urbanizing areas like Turkey do not advance proportionally with economic growth and urban development. While a strict 1:1 ratio of wage growth to economic growth is not a realistic expectation, it is worth exploring why people in these newly urbanized areas reap less advantage than the broader economic picture might suggest they should.
One factor that cannot be ignored when examining urbanization and its tradeoffs is globalization. As an area becomes more globalized and urbanized, there is a jarring effect on its culture and society. Revised global networks create a degree of disruption in communities that were previously more insulated and internally cohesive. Entirely new and different social groups can emerge as a result of the cultural upheaval that follows. Turkey has experienced this acutely since it began its significant urban shift in the 1980s. While some individuals have profited and done well as a result of these changes, many others have been pushed into poverty — a trend that has become increasingly visible over the years. In short, urbanization, cultural change, and globalization have produced clear winners, but they have also produced significant losers (Keyder). Two factors that help explain these divergent outcomes are the public/private sector dichotomy that emerges and the uneven distribution of market potential across different areas and communities (Karahasan, Dogruel, and Dogruel). A related example of this dynamic can be seen when Turkish firms expand beyond the country's borders into markets such as Pakistan (Fu).
"State intervention marginalizes planners and the poor"
When a developing country rapidly expands and grows, there are bound to be growing pains. However, those pains and negative effects can easily be aggravated when harmful patterns are allowed to persist unchecked. Turkey is clearly emblematic of this, and the experiences of the last one to two generations of growth in that country provide ample evidence. The most effective ways to mitigate these negative consequences are partially understood, but their implementation in Turkey has not been as sustained or far-reaching as it should be. Whether that remains the case or continues to worsen remains to be seen.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.