Utilitarianism as the Best Guide to Living Well and Rightly
This paper argues that utilitarianism, as developed by philosophers such as Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, is the ethical theory best suited to guiding people toward a life that is both happy and morally right. Drawing on Callahan's framework of moral theories that integrate thinking, doing, and living, the paper compares utilitarianism with Kantian ethics and Aristotle's virtue ethics. It contends that utilitarianism's emphasis on promoting the greatest happiness for all affected parties — rather than acting from duty or self-centered virtue — makes it uniquely suited to fostering reason, community-mindedness, and genuine moral goodness in everyday life.
- Introduction: Moral Theories and the Good Life: Overview of three ethical theories; utilitarianism thesis stated
- What Makes a Moral Theory Effective: Callahan's standard for a good moral theory applied
- The Core Principle of Utilitarianism: Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle explained and defended
- Comparing Utilitarianism, Kant, and Aristotle: Utilitarianism contrasted with Kantian and virtue ethics
- Reason, Freedom, and the Utilitarian Ideal: Mill's emphasis on reason and its social implications
- Conclusion: Living for Others as the Path to Living Well: Community-focused living as the utilitarian ideal
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper establishes a clear thesis early and returns to it consistently, keeping the argument focused throughout.
- It uses concrete examples — such as lying to save a loved one or a stranger — to ground abstract ethical distinctions in relatable, real-world scenarios.
- The comparative structure allows the writer to acknowledge the merits of competing theories (Kantianism, virtue ethics) before demonstrating why utilitarianism surpasses them, which strengthens the overall argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of comparative ethical analysis: presenting multiple moral frameworks on their own terms before applying a consistent evaluative criterion — in this case, Callahan's standard of a theory that integrates thinking, doing, and living — to judge which theory best meets the stated goal. This avoids strawmanning rival positions while still building a persuasive case for the preferred theory.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a survey of three major ethical theories and announces its thesis in favor of utilitarianism. It then defines its evaluative standard using Callahan's framework before explaining Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle. The middle sections compare utilitarianism with Kantianism and Aristotle's virtue ethics through concrete examples. The paper closes by connecting utilitarianism to Mill's broader values of reason and community, reinforcing the thesis that living for others is the truest path to living well.
Introduction: Moral Theories and the Good Life
Moral theories have become theories because philosophers throughout history have believed they can help guide people toward a life that is both happy and morally right. Some of these theories include utilitarianism, which holds that right and wrong can be determined by a cost-benefit analysis — weighing the costs against who will benefit and who will not; Kantianism, which includes Kant's categorical imperative, stating that we must act only in ways we could will to become universal laws (for example, one can only justify stealing if one is willing for everyone in the world to steal — including from oneself); and Aristotle's virtue ethics, which argues that personal happiness is the ultimate goal we should promote.
There are, of course, other moral theories, but for the purposes of this paper these three are highlighted to illustrate the most commonly discussed differences among ethical frameworks. While all three have solid arguments behind them, it is utilitarianism — an ethical theory advanced by philosophers such as David Hume, Jeremy Bentham, William Godwin, and John Stuart Mill, among others — that is the ethical theory most representative of living well and rightly.
What Makes a Moral Theory Effective
In his article "Moral Theory: Thinking, Doing, and Living," Callahan (18) states that the best moral theories are those that can integrate all three actions named in the title: thinking, doing, and living. A good ethical theory, in terms of understanding and applying it to our lives, is one that can "make sense of our moral instincts, intuitions, and traditions" and offers us a "plausible perspective on the making of moral judgments, the fashioning of rules and principles, and the devising of a virtuous life" (18).
Utilitarianism is, arguably, the best ethical theory when it comes to living a good and right life because it allows us to integrate all three of those actions. It is not a difficult theory to understand, it is easy to apply to everyday life, and it will ultimately help us lead morally good lives that are also genuinely fulfilling.
The Core Principle of Utilitarianism
The entire principle behind utilitarianism is that an action is right if it produces as much or more happiness for all those affected by it than any other available action, and wrong if it does not. John Stuart Mill focuses on the Greatest Happiness Principle: actions are right if they promote happiness and wrong if they do not. The more happiness produced, the better; the less suffering caused to others, the better as well.
Some have argued that Mill's utilitarianism leaves room for confusion — particularly regarding the fact that even when we act with the intention of producing the greatest happiness, our actions might take an unexpected turn and produce consequences we could not have foreseen. This is a viable concern, but it applies equally to all ethical theories, since no one can ever know with certainty what the future holds. A person can only act in the moment and within a particular situation. Acting so that our behavior promotes the greatest happiness is the only way we can and should live, because any other approach reduces morality to mere duty — as with Kant's categorical imperative, which demands we act only as we would will something to be universally accepted.
Conclusion: Living for Others as the Path to Living Well
Being happy in life is not solely about oneself. Aristotle's virtue ethics are appealing because they teach people to cultivate their virtues, but the framework does not direct us to place others before ourselves. Some may counter that by honing our virtues as Aristotle instructed, we develop qualities that will benefit others — but the emphasis remains in the wrong place.
To live a good and right life, we must accept that we are a small part of a much larger community. Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville — a philosopher who influenced Mill — believed we had to think of our individual souls as part of the world's soul, and this is what makes utilitarianism so compelling. Utilitarian ethics can teach us to reason, to deliberate, and to think of others before ourselves. All we can hope is that others will do the same.
Works Cited
Callahan, Daniel. "Moral Theory: Thinking, Doing, and Living." Journal of Social Philosophy, 20(1–2), 1989, pp. 18–24.
Smith, Steve. Ways of Wisdom. University Press of America, 1983.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.