Workplace Violence in Nursing: Review of Deans (2004)
This paper critically reviews Cecil Deans' 2004 article "Who Cares for Nurses," which examines the lived experience of workplace aggression among registered nurses in Australia. The review situates Deans' work within broader literature on healthcare workplace violence, discusses the study's rationale, sampling and data collection methods, analytical framework, and ethical safeguards. It identifies key themes uncovered by Deans — professional incompetency, expectation to cope, and emotional confusion — while evaluating both the strengths and limitations of the study's design. The paper concludes that workplace violence in healthcare settings poses serious psychological, social, and physical risks to nursing staff, and that greater institutional awareness and preventive action are urgently needed.
- Introduction: Workplace violence in healthcare harms nurses
- Rationale for Relevance to Nursing and Clinical Practice: Epidemic-level violence and prevention gaps in healthcare
- Problem Definition and Purpose: Aggression's detrimental effects on nurse performance
- Literature Review, Sampling, and Data Collection: Study design, sample selection, and interview methods
- Data Analysis and Findings: Hybrid analysis reveals three key nurse experience themes
- Ethical Issues and Study Presentation: Ethical safeguards and study strengths and weaknesses
- Conclusion: Workplace aggression seriously impacts nursing staff
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper integrates multiple scholarly sources alongside Deans' primary study, grounding the review in a well-established body of literature on healthcare workplace violence.
- It follows a clear, systematic structure — moving from rationale through methodology to findings and critique — which mirrors standard critical appraisal frameworks used in nursing education.
- The balanced evaluation, acknowledging both strengths and weaknesses of Deans' study, demonstrates critical thinking rather than mere summary.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates source synthesis: rather than simply summarizing Deans in isolation, it weaves in corroborating evidence from multiple peer-reviewed articles (Antai-Otong, Boyd, Gribbin, Clark and Clark) to reinforce the significance of the central problem. This technique situates a single study within a larger scholarly conversation, which is a hallmark of rigorous academic writing at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction establishing the problem of workplace violence in healthcare, then moves through five analytical sections — rationale, problem definition, literature review, data analysis, and ethical issues — before closing with a brief conclusion. Each section addresses a distinct element of the critical appraisal, giving the paper a logical, sequential flow that makes the argument easy to follow.
Introduction
When people become healthcare practitioners today, perhaps one of the furthest things from their minds is the increasingly violent nature of their potential workplaces. In his article "Who Cares for Nurses" (2004), Cecil Deans makes the point that North American healthcare settings are very violent places to work, and that many institutions are not providing their practitioners with sufficient protections — some are simply looking the other way — all at the expense of the mental and physical well-being of their nursing staff. In their essay "Challenges Facing Nurses' Associations and Unions: A Global Perspective" (2003), Clark and Clark note that "nurses, as the most highly trained caregivers with regular patient contact, are at the heart of any health care system. Widespread anecdotal evidence suggests that the problems in health care have had a particularly negative effect on the workplace experience of nurses" (29).
According to Gribbin (2002), "hospitals can be scary places for patients, but for doctors, nurses and others who work there they can be downright dangerous" (28). Likewise, Hanrahan (1997) points out that "nurses get abused all the time. We don't call it that. It's just part of the job" (43). This aspect of being compelled to accept violence in healthcare settings is a common theme in the literature.
The study by Deans points out that violence in the healthcare industry has been widely reported as a serious problem, with registered nurses frequently on the receiving end of physical, verbal, and sexual abuse: "Some authors have reported aggression is so prevalent nurses accept it as part of their job" (32). For nurses, the anger that naturally results from being subjected to a hazardous working environment is frequently directed at colleagues and supervisors, accompanied by demands for immediate remedies for potentially hazardous work conditions and improvement of existing policies (Clements, Fay-Hillier, & Sacks, 2001).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.