Writing Portfolios and Peer Self-Assessment in Literacy
This paper evaluates two prominent approaches to assessing student writing literacy: writing portfolios and peer and self-assessments. Drawing on scholarship from educational measurement and teacher education research, the paper examines how each method captures student progress, fosters accountability, and supports collaborative learning. It also addresses shared challenges, including insufficient instructor training and the need for standardized evaluation criteria. The paper concludes that, when implemented consistently and effectively, writing portfolios and peer and self-assessments function as complementary tools that together provide a richer, more accurate picture of student literacy development than either method alone.
- Introduction: Assessing Writing Literacy: Two key literacy assessment methods introduced
- Writing Portfolios as Assessment Tools: Definition, design, and implementation challenges
- Peer and Self-Assessments in the Classroom: Collaborative benefits and training requirements
- Comparing Benefits and Drawbacks: Shared strengths, limitations, and complementary value
- References: Cited scholarly sources
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper opens by clearly situating both assessment methods within the same frame, then develops each in turn before comparing them — a logical structure that aids reader comprehension.
- Every major claim is supported with a direct citation, often including page numbers, which demonstrates careful engagement with the scholarly literature rather than reliance on generalizations.
- The concluding paragraph synthesizes the comparison fairly, acknowledging shared limitations while affirming the complementary value of combining both tools.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the comparative analysis technique: two distinct but related concepts are introduced together, each is examined in depth, and then both are assessed side by side for benefits and drawbacks. This approach allows the writer to build toward a synthesized recommendation rather than simply describing each method in isolation.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a four-part structure: (1) an introductory paragraph that previews both methods and establishes their shared significance; (2) a focused section on writing portfolios, including definition, implementation, and challenges; (3) a parallel section on peer and self-assessments covering collaborative benefits and training needs; and (4) a comparative conclusion that weighs both methods against each other and affirms their complementary use in literacy instruction.
Introduction: Assessing Writing Literacy
Two of the most effective assessments of literacy skills are writing portfolios and peer and self-assessments. Peer and self-assessments are student-led practices that have been linked with measurable improvements in core writing skills development, as well as increased accountability in the classroom, increased social interactions, and increased accuracy (Harris & Brown, 2013). Writing portfolios have for decades been a reliable method of assessing writing literacy, capturing a "richer array of what students know and can do" as well as revealing the "processes by which students produce work" (Arter & Spandel, 1992, p. 36). Both writing portfolios and peer and self-assessments offer instructors the means to develop the "careful and rigorous approach" that leads to meaningful and accurate assessments of literacy (Scharf, Elliot, Huey, et al., 2007, p. 462). Writing portfolios and peer and self-assessments also offer the potential for multifaceted assessments that extend beyond the measurement of core literacy modes — for example, by allowing instructors to simultaneously assess information literacy.
Writing Portfolios as Assessment Tools
Portfolios have become something of a "buzz word," making a clear definition of what a writing portfolio actually entails all the more necessary (Arter & Spandel, 1992, p. 36). At the very least, a writing portfolio is a collection of a student's written work. However, it is not simply an arbitrary selection of writing samples, but one that has been purposefully curated. The writing portfolio should "tell a story" — not necessarily in terms of substantive content, but in terms of the student's own progress or learning journey (Arter & Spandel, 1992, p. 36).
In addition to writing samples that fulfill specific assignment instructions, a writing portfolio should ideally include students' written self-reflections. If writing portfolios are to be integrated into an instructor's assessment arsenal, it is best to establish clear criteria for evaluation in order to prevent bias and ensure consistency. Unfortunately, research reveals that few instructors possess formal training in how to properly implement writing portfolios as an assessment tool (Crusan, Plakans & Gebril, 2016).
Peer and Self-Assessments in the Classroom
Likewise, instructors may be insufficiently trained in how to use peer and self-assessments (Crusan, Plakans & Gebril, 2016; Xu & Carless, 2016). Peer and self-assessments can be among the most fruitful means of creating a collaborative learning environment, encouraging both cognitive scaffolding and "social-affective support" in the classroom (Xu & Carless, 2016, p. 1082). To improve the methods by which peer and self-assessments take place in classrooms, Harris & Brown (2013) recommend formal student training in how to perform both types of assessments.
Both teachers and students need a "deeper understanding" of how to use peer and self-assessments for improvement and for self-regulation (Harris & Brown, 2013, p. 101). When peer and self-assessments are integrated into pedagogical practices, they can transform the educational environment, improve student outcomes, and promote general improvement, accountability, social interaction, and accuracy (Harris & Brown, 2013).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.