Kennedy-Nixon Presidential Debates In 1960 Essay

Kennedy-Nixon presidential debates in 1960 were the first to be broadcast on television. The significance of the Kennedy-Nixon debates had less to do with evolutions in technology, and more with how television changed the nature of politics in the United States. In particular, television influenced the way American citizens perceived the presidential candidates. What I found most interesting about the Kennedy-Nixon debates is that the broadcast marked the first time that Americans become more concerned with the image of the candidates rather than the content of their messages.

Kennedy was widely considered the victor in the debates not because of what he said but because of the way he looked on television especially compared with his opponent (Morton 2005). Nixon looked nervous and also agreed to use a makeup called "LazyShave," which made his face appear blotchy (Morton 2005). Kennedy, on the other hand, looked younger, slimmer, and tan. He also agreed to use makeup like television actors would. His more youthful appearance helped win over many voters who saw Kennedy as a more attractive leader than Nixon. After reading about the Nixon-Kennedy debates, I thought it was remarkable that color television had an immediate impact on politics. I find it interesting that human beings react so strongly to a person's physical appearance and wonder how many other important decisions are based on looks. Even if Nixon did eventually get elected to the office of the presidency, this debate made him lose the 1960 election.

The Kennedy-Nixon debates were only the first of many that would be televised. Using television as a way to gain votes has been a key political tactic since the Kennedy-Nixon debates. As Morton (2005) points out, Al Gore sighed while George W. Bush was speaking, which made him come across as being pompous. I found it fascinating that candidates need to be almost like television stars in order for them to become elected. Politics is not only about how intelligent a candidate is or even their credentials. American voters appreciate style as much as substance.

References

Morton, B. (2005). "Kennedy-Nixon debate changed politics for good." CNN.com. Retrieved July 18, 2009 from http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/09/26/kennedy.nixon/index.html

Cite this Document:

"Kennedy-Nixon Presidential Debates In 1960" (2009, July 18) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/kennedy-nixon-presidential-debates-in-1960-20505

"Kennedy-Nixon Presidential Debates In 1960" 18 July 2009. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/kennedy-nixon-presidential-debates-in-1960-20505>

"Kennedy-Nixon Presidential Debates In 1960", 18 July 2009, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/kennedy-nixon-presidential-debates-in-1960-20505

Related Documents

It might have been the combination of the right timing with this new satellite technology and this horrific event of the President being shot that changed the public interest in complete, live, and around the clock coverage. The fact that television at that time could bring powerful images of what was happening in the world and could make the incident seem like a local event that was happening in their own

Nixon and Watergate It Was
PAGES 10 WORDS 4038

Kennedy won the election by a very narrow margin, 120,000 votes or 0.2% of the electorate. Most historians believe that the primary reason John F. Kennedy won the Presidential Election was because of the non-verbal "poor body language" on the television debate with Richard Nixon in 1960 -- especially valid since radio audiences overwhelmingly voted that Nixon had won the debate. Nixon's body language was furtive, he was perspiring,

Also, viewers may perceive the negative advertising as an infringement upon their right to decide for themselves. Such a perception may result in reactance, a boomerang effect in which the individual reacts in a manner opposite to the persuader's intention. What these studies show, then, is that a candidate is never going to know how for sure how a negative ad may impact the voters. In the long run,

Table of Contents Abstract 2 Introduction 3 Literature Review 4 Theoretical Discussion and Hypothesis 6 Research Design 6 Type of Research Design and Sampling 6 Temporal and Spatial Scope 7 Unit of Analysis 7 Operationalization of Dependent and Independent Variables 7 Data Collection Instruments and Techniques 8 Data Processing and Testing Techniques 8 Results (Expected) 8 Discussion 9 Works Cited 11 How Does the Media Influence Presidential Elections? Abstract This paper looks at the influence of media on presidential elections by first discussing the first presidential debate

Catholic church and public policy have remarked that the members of American clergy in general, without even excepting those who do not admit religious liberty, are all in favour of civil freedom; but they do not support any particular political system. They keep aloof from parties, and from public affairs. In the United States religion exercises but little influence upon laws, and upon the details of public opinion; but it

Richard Nixon
PAGES 7 WORDS 2332

Richard M. Nixon: The Transformation from Disgraced President to Senior Statesman have chosen a plan for peace for Vietnam. I believe it will succeed. If it does succeed, what the critics say now won't matter. If it does not succeed, anything I say then won't matter. - Richard M. Nixon, televised address to the nation, 1969 While no one would likely call America's long-term involvement in Vietnam as "success" by any