Language Proficiency And Content Understanding

Seamless Bridge As language may be viewed as a vehicle by which a student can better achieve academic success (Gottlieb, 2006), language proficiency assessments are ways in which the teacher can review whether or not the student is developing language proficiency rather than just content understanding. Thus the idea that students who are learning an additional or second language will seamlessly bridge into grade-level content once they reach the highest level of proficiency is a simple extension of the reality that language affords the user: it is the means by which understanding and success in a culture wherein that language is used can be obtained. Thus, if an ELL develops a true understanding and grasp of the language, the grade-level content that the student should be able to grasp is made available to him: it opens up because the language proficiency acts as the key what would otherwise be a door or barrier.

I connect with this idea in the same way that Delia Pompa of Adolescent Literacy notes how important is the idea of building trust with ELLs and their families (AdLit, n.d.). Trust is the foundation of any relationship;...

...

If there is no trust, there can be no growth. This concept works well with teachers attempting to help ELLs develop their language skills, as their objectives align with the students' and with their families'. They develop together a culture of trust and respect that facilitates growth.
At the same time, the student has to develop a trust of the language. Students can be fearful of language because they do not know how to use it or what words mean or how meaning is conveyed. They do not trust the language to be the tool that it is because they do not know how to use it. There has to be, therefore, a degree of trust inculcated in the student for the language itself. The student has to be made to see that the language does work, that it does make sense, that anyone can learn to use it and that it is not just for "professionals" or for highly intelligent people. The language itself has to be trusted by the student so that the ELL can develop a healthy relationship with it, can want to be associated…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

AdLit. (n.d.). Building Trust with Families. Retrieved from http://www.adlit.org/media/mediatopics/ells/

Gottlieb, M. (2006). Assessing English language learners: Bridges from language proficiency to academic achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.


Cite this Document:

"Language Proficiency And Content Understanding" (2016, June 08) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/language-proficiency-and-content-understanding-2159992

"Language Proficiency And Content Understanding" 08 June 2016. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/language-proficiency-and-content-understanding-2159992>

"Language Proficiency And Content Understanding", 08 June 2016, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/language-proficiency-and-content-understanding-2159992

Related Documents

Language Impairments: Evidence-Based Interventions Language Impairment Interventions Evidence-Based Interventions for Pediatric Language Impairments Evidence-Based Interventions for Pediatric Language Impairments So strong is the genetic impulse driving language acquisition that all children will learn to speak some form of language (Sousa, 2011, p. 28, 196). This fact suggests that the remaining question confronting children, parents, educators, and society is how well these skills are learned. Problems encountered along the way, however, can sometimes have a

Language Barrier
PAGES 3 WORDS 933

Sometimes students have obstacles to contend with as they enter school. One such barrier can be language. The student I worked with is a Chinese first year student who is attempting to assimilate to AP class schedules. He is a 14-year old interested in learning the English language and is having problems not only learning the language but balancing out the needs of his identity versus the American culture. English

Language and Social Grouping Language is used differently in different geographic groups, ethnic, age, gender, and socioeconomic groups (Williams, 2010). Geographic groups use the same languages in different dialects that belong to the particular geographic regions. Within each language are many different dialects that have been formed with different geographic locations and cultures. Shared words, experiences, cultures, and expressions are ethnic and shared elements of the social fabric. Language of a common

Theoretically, CLIL draws on research that situates the integration of language and content as the relationship between form and meaning. An understanding of the theory and practice related to the content-based classroom is essential to the present study. In this section of the chapter, I outline the underlying theory and rationale commonly cited as a basis for CLIL, review empirical research that has evaluated CLIL in the classroom, and

First, Spanish sounds different from English in terms of vowel sounds, sentence stress, and timing. (Shoebottom, 2007, Spanish). In addition, Spanish speakers can confront grammar problems when learning English, "although Spanish is a much more heavily inflected language than English, there are many aspects of verb grammar that are similar. The major problem for the Spanish learner is that there is no one-to-one correspondence in the use of the

The primary focus is therefore on hearing and speaking, while reading forms a part of the advanced stages of this approach. While the direct approach might be somewhat daunting for the introductory language student, culture is an aspect that makes language teaching meaningful and enjoyable. This aspect can therefore be included at all stages of the learning process. The Reading Approach This approach, as its name suggests, focuses mainly on reading, grammar